Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Elizabeth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re an Elizabeth resident who has suffered from a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier law firm is your top choice for legal representation. Renowned across Illinois for their prowess in the field of personal injury claims, they have handled numerous successful dog bite cases. With their vast experience and deep understanding of the laws governing these types of injuries, they aim to secure justice for victims by holding accountable parties responsible. They are committed to ensuring that clients obtain rightful compensation covering medical bills or losses incurred due to the incident. Compassionate yet assertive, their attorneys understand how traumatizing such experiences can be and strive ardently on your behalf; all while maintaining high standards of professionalism and confidentiality. Their strategic approach towards each case combined with acute knowledge make them leading experts in this domain – poised as ideal candidates to represent your case against any severity or complexity related to Dog Bite Injuries claims that may arise in Elizabeth’s jurisdiction. Choose Carlson Bier – where advocacy meets unparalleled expertise.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Elizabeth Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of highly skilled personal injury attorneys with dedicated experience in the intricacies of Illinois law. A significant portion of our expertise lies in handling cases related to Dog Bite Injuries, an area often overlooked and widely misunderstood. It’s critical for individuals affected by such incidents to understand their rights, options, and potential paths to compensation.

As respected Illinois-based lawyers, we prioritize imparting practical insights about Dog Bite Incidents. The focus is firmly on upholding your best interests while navigating through these complex litigations. Primarily, there are three important aspects:

• The Nature of the Incident: Living with the aftermath of a dog bite can be mentally as well as physically challenging for victims. Such experiences often entail significant emotional distress, combined with severe physical injuries that could include puncture wounds or infections leading potentially even to life-altering complications.

• Medical Expenses: Coupling physical trauma with mounting hospital bills adds another layer of stress on victims’ shoulders. We strive to address these issues head-on and seek remuneration covering not only surgical costs but also therapy sessions required for mental health rehabilitation post-incident.

• Bearer’s Liability: Central to any dog bite case is determining responsibility for the incident which involves intricate understanding of precedence in previous similar cases handled within Illinois jurisdiction. This aids us craft robust defenses placing rightful accountability on dog owners or caretakers at the time of incidence.

Simply put, if you’ve undergone extreme trauma due to aggressive canine behavior resulting from negligent actions or sheer lack of effective control mechanisms by those responsible for it; you have every right under Illinois laws to seek justice and adequate compensation for your suffering.

Durability ensues from expertise gleaned over years where we’ve successfully campaigned for hundreds victimized due to avoidable negligence across locales spanning vast boundaries within Illinois – always staying informed about ever-evolving laws pertaining specifically to personal injury space here.

What separates Carlson Bier from others is more than our in-depth knowledge and dedicated approach; we genuinely care about your plight. We recognize the significance of mental recovery post-trauma, right alongside achieving a favorable courtroom verdict for you. Our insistence upon personalized attention to individual cases allows us to detail strategies that are uniquely aligned with your circumstances.

In essence, Carlson Bier is committed to fiercely advocating for you – translating legal jargon into comprehensible language while providing strategically advanced litigation services. As an esteemed Illinois-based law group, we firmly believe in upholding highest professional standards by consistently delivering valuable results bridging trust via transparency every step along the way.

Your quest for justice should not be further burdened by financial worries or societal misconceptions surrounding dog bite incidents. We invite you to take constructive action towards securing just compensation rightfully due to you by entrusting your case with our able hands at Carlson Bier.

We’re here to extract maximum value out of seemingly overwhelming circumstances – all through sensitive collaboration prioritizing your emotional well-being as much as providing competent legalese expertise.

Teaming up with us means placing yourself in a position where transparency rules overwhelmingly – making sure no question goes unanswered throughout this legal journey.

The clock is ticking and delay could only invariably pose potential risk on legal claims associated under Illinois laws specific to personal injury categories like Dog Bite Incidents. Click on the button below now! Secure a free case review exploring how much exactly can be claimed while seeking rightful reparations due under such instances, under guidance from seasoned professionals who’ve made it their mission championing those wronged unfairly under predictable negligence situations within state boundaries. At Carlson Bier, imparting massive value translates into actions that bring hope amidst challenging times like these- Let’s navigate this path together now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elizabeth Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Elizabeth

Areas of Practice in Elizabeth

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying professional legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing professional legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Committed to assisting clients of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Trucking Accident

Providing experienced legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Committed to extending dedicated legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Expert in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer