...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Elizabeth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one become victims of Medical Malpractice in Elizabeth, the consequences can be devastating. While legal redress cannot fully restore your health, it helps hold responsible parties accountable while safeguarding others from such harm. The professional prowess of Carlson Bier law firm gives you a decisive advantage in these complex cases. Understandably so; because when medical professionals falter on their work ethics, life as we know it may change irreparably — and justice calls for action. Our attorneys are experienced in Illinois’s stringent malpractice laws and leverage this expertise to build strong defenses that demand rightful compensation for our clients’ sufferings. At Carlson Bier, we dig deep into each case with uncompromising thoroughness and precision – presenting powerful arguments before judge & jury alike while negotiating solid settlements outside court whenever needed; hence ensuring our clients get due consideration legally & financially speaking under Illinois state law regulations encompassing Medical Malpractice affairs specifically tailored towards providing proficient guidance through turbulent times shadowed by unfortunate events.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Elizabeth Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on being more than just attorneys. We are advocates who are deeply committed to representing victims of medical malpractice across Illinois with zealous tenacity and ethical professionalism. In an arena as complex and nuanced as medical malpractice law, it is vital for the aggrieved party to have resilient support that guarantees them a fair resolution.

Medical malpractice is a severe form of negligence that can result in devastating outcomes like permanent disability or even death. It occurs when a healthcare provider fails to adhere to the established standard of care during the treatment process resulting in profound harm or injury to the patient. This negligence ranges from misdiagnosis, improper treatment methods, surgical errors, medication errors, inappropriate aftercare techniques and many more.

Highlighted below are some key comprehension points:

• Medical malpractice is essentially professional negligence by omissions or erroneous actions taken by a healthcare professional.

• For a case to qualify as medical malpractice, it requires proof of violation of standard care; an injury was caused due to this negligence which resulted in significant damages.

• Keep in mind that not all unfavorable outcomes qualify as medical malpractice.

At Carlson Bier, we utilize our deep expertise coupled with tireless dedication to hold liable parties accountable while ensuring you receive full compensation for your anguish and suffering. With every client we represent, each case becomes personal; inspiring our fervor for justice – a cornerstone upon which this firm was built.

We understand that experiencing any form of medical malpractice creates physical, emotional, and financial burdens which at times can feel overwhelming. Insurance companies often fail patients affected by adding further complications into their quest for restitution – presenting bureaucracy ridden processes designed fundamentally for self-interest preservation. Here’s where we come in; serving amidst these dishearteners as staunch advocates ready to navigate through these complexities whilst eliminating undue stress from our clients’ lives.

How exactly do we achieve this? At Carlson Bier –

• Our team is driven by passion and resilience, reviewing facts, compiling evidence, addressing counterclaims to build a potent case.

• We offer personalized attention throughout the litigation process. Our goal isn’t just about winning lawsuits but ensuring our clients find closure and can finally move forward.

• Every potential claim undergoes intensive scrutiny before customization into an action plan specific for successful resolution.

Medical malpractice cases constitute a significant part of personal injury law; they’re intricate necessitating meticulous examination in order to establish presence or absence of negligence – with that said, it’s important to engage specialized legal representation for such complex procedures.

Remember; every suit has time limits subject to the statute of limitations peculiar to each state. In Illinois specifically, victims must file their lawsuits within two years from when they first noticed the malpractice-related injury or should have reasonably done so. Failure could result in loss of entitlements towards damage claims however there are some exceptions depending on particular circumstances surrounding each case which could either shorten or lengthen this timeline.

We understand you may not be certain whether your situation constitutes as medical malpractice or how best to navigate seeking justice. The experienced team at Carlson Bier invites you into understanding your rights and determining the validity of your concerns through comprehensible consultation sessions – adequately equipped with actionable insights enabling you make more informed decisions.

Considering filing a lawsuit for medical malpractice? Wondering what your case is worth? Click on the button below and begin a journey with us today. At Carlson Bier, we don’t just represent victims; we staunchly advocate empowering simplistic navigation towards fair resolution accompanied with justified compensation worthy of all endured suffering caused by medical negligence across Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elizabeth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Elizabeth

Areas of Practice in Elizabeth

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying expert legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring professional legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents obtain fair settlement for damages and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Collision

Providing expert legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Specializing in extending compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to representing patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​