Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Elizabeth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has endured the misfortune of being involved in a pedestrian accident in Elizabeth, turn to the reliable services offered by Carlson Bier. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our extensive expertise lies specifically within pedestrian accidents. Our dedicated team proudly represents clients dealing with intricate legal situations related to such unfortunate incidents. Carlson Bier’s success rate is reflective of trustworthy representation and rigorous commitment towards every individual case.

Our attorneys are skilled at comprehending complex liability issues that generally accompany pedestrian accidents. Their astute understanding empowers them to proficiently navigate through this vast field – ensuring each client gets rightful compensation for medical charges, lost wages and other associated costs arising from their incident.

Irrespective of your situation’s complexity, Carlson Bier can help guide you on a path towards justice and recovery while upholding utmost compassion for your personal plight. We endeavor tirelessly until achieving desirable outcomes for our clients; demonstrative traits making us your optimal choice when seeking strong legal counsel concerning any form of pedestrian-related accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Elizabeth Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated group of personal injury attorneys specializing in various areas of the law, including pedestrian accidents. Catastrophic injuries from pedestrian accidents can leave victims with significant medical expenses and long-term physical impairments. We understand your concerns, and our goal is to help you navigate through this challenging time by providing personalized legal representation to protect your rights and ensure you receive the compensation that you deserve.

Pedestrian accidents often occur due to negligence or recklessness on someone’s part, such as a driver using their cellphone while driving, failing to obey traffic signals or laws related to pedestrians right of way.

Here are key factors we examine when assessing a pedestrian accident case:

* The nature and severity of injuries sustained

* Details surrounding the accident environment (weather conditions, available lighting, road layout)

* Compliance with traffic rules by both parties involved

* Any forms of distraction at play during the incident

* Presence or absence of signage indicating pedestrian crossing

These factors contribute significantly toward establishing fault and determining the level of compensation required for any injuries sustained.

The team at Carlson Bier has years of experience dealing with cases related to pedestrian accidents within Illinois. We work closely with local authorities, accident reconstruction experts, private investigators, health professionals and other necessary entities whose insights could strengthen your case. Undertaking an extensive investigation into every aspect pertaining to your accident is important as it provides us a solid platform for negotiating on your behalf for optimum results.

In terms of potential damages that may be recovered after a pedestrian accident, they generally fall into three categories:

1) Economic Damages: These include medical expenses associated with treatment and recovery processes. Herein also lies implications for expenses relating to future care needs – oftentimes vital in cases involving permanent disabilities.

2) Non-Economic Damages: This involves considering elements like pain & suffering endured by the victim post-injury. Mental anguish stemming from severe harm alongside loss or reduction in quality of life also falls under this umbrella.

3) Punitive Damages: These are relevant in scenarios where the defendant’s actions were exceptionally negligent or directly intended to cause harm. If proven, punitive damages could go a long way in establishing a stronger compensation figure.

However, no two cases are identical. Each carries its unique set of circumstances making it difficult to predict an accurate total value for potential damages without extensive analysis and legal expertise. That is where we come into play.

Our firm of dedicated attorneys believes that each client deserves diligent attention when trying to secure just compensation for their hardships due to someone else’s negligence. We appreciate having open lines of communication at all times with our clients, allowing them access to necessary case updates while listening attentively for anything they may wish to share regarding their recovery process or concerns arising from the accident.

At Carlson Bier, your needs and overall comfort throughout the legal procedure remains our paramount concern as we work tirelessly towards attaining justice on your behalf after a pedestrian accident.

Through years of experience serving Illinois residents involved in severe accidents, we’ve cultivated comprehensive strategies aimed at securing full and fair settlements for injured pedestrians and their families. Our team is ready to leverage every tool within our arsenal synchronically with tireless dedication for achieving victorious outcomes irrespective of how complex any particular case might appear initially.

Are you looking forward to getting an estimation regarding that potential worth attached to your own pedestrian mishap case? While online tools available may furnish generic figures based on average costs relating commonly sustained injuries during such accidents – nothing compares in accuracy than personalized examination by experienced personal injury attorneys specializing explicitly in handling pedestrian accident cases like ours.

Feel free to initiate that first step towards claiming what rightfully belongs! Click on the button below right now – let Carlson Bier provide you that exceptional level of guidance needed during these trying periods culminating into utmost satisfaction once victory stands declared solidifying recompense deserving being handed over!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elizabeth Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Elizabeth

Areas of Practice in Elizabeth

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying specialist legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Harms

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for harms and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Extending experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in representing victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer