...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Elsah

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from dog bite injuries, securing legal representation should be a priority. Carlson Bier, established in Illinois, stands as your best partner to tackle such personal injury cases. Their expertise revolves around navigating the complexity of dog bite law and ensuring their clients receive just compensation for their pain and emotional distress. As you grapple with medical bills or lost wages due to your injuries, this reputable firm will prioritize making things right for you by holding negligent pet owners accountable under Illinois’s strict liability laws regarding dog attacks. With Carlson Bier on board, everything pivots towards justice – from their exhaustive investigations to helping decode insurance policies applicable in such cases. They diligently work while keeping clients updated every step of the way – reinforcing trust coupled with professional assurance every client deserves amidst trying times brought about by unforeseen circumstances like dog bites. Choose Carlson Bier; they are not simply lawyers but allies intimately understanding the intricacies of personal injury litigation related to canine aggression scenarios ensnaring countless individuals across state boundaries and cities such as Elsah.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Elsah Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we passionately advocate for victims of personal injury in Illinois, with a particular emphasis on dog bite injuries. Navigate through complex legal terrain with ease under guidance from our seasoned group personal injury attorneys who understand keenly that every case is different and employs an individualized approach towards each client.

Dog bite injuries can escalate rapidly from minor discomfort to disquieting complications if not handled with professional medical attention. The physical pain is only part of the experience; psychological distress following such events can be significant and overlooked frequently. Understanding this double-edged impact, we merge extensive legality and thorough medical insight in dealing with your case, ensuring a comprehensive obligation to your wellbeing.

There are a whole host of issues that potential claimants may not even consider when involved in a dog bite incident:

• Medical Bills: An immediate consequence often endured by victims.

• Future Medical Expenses: Often stemming from infections or surgeries required due to scarring/disfigurement.

• Emotional Distress: Fear, anxiety, nightmares – all are common reactions post bites.

• Lost Wages: Time taken off work as you recover results in lost income.

Despite popular opinion suggesting these cases straightforward, the nature of such claims can be incredibly intricate with Illinois having regulations that cover ‘dangerous dogs’, criteria that requires scrupulous investigation. We ensure no stone remains unturned in charting out your road to compensation through deep-dive investigations focused on proving liability through signs of aggression; any previous dangerous incidents involving the dog; owner negligence among others.

Being well-versed with specifics around the Illinois Animal Control Act allows us at Carlson Bier to strategically represent you while addressing unique challenges presented within these injury cases. This precise knowledge ensures you receive meaningful advice based on current laws thereby simplifying decision-making regarding whether or not pursuing legal action would benefit you most effectively.

Moreover, it’s crucial information that insurance companies typically shoulder payouts for these pet-related injuries; hence, a robust legal stance becomes imperative when combating downplayed claims. We shoulder the responsibility of ensuring that you not only receive due compensation for your injuries but aren’t left short-changed on insurance dues either.

At Carlson Bier Group, our reputation is shaped by successfully advocating for our client’s rights while adhering to our commitment to professional excellence and ethical standards. Honesty and integrity form the cornerstones of our practices with transparent communication fostering informed choices.

An experienced attorney in dog bite cases can nicely navigate laws wrapped around them ensuring maximum compensation. It brings to light the unsuspected aspects of receiving treatment or pursuing claims resulting from such personal injuries which ensures lawful help rather than resorting to common-place solutions related typically used if victims may simply perceive these as regular accident incidents.

Our comprehensive pool of resources, impeccable track records, empathic approach are dedicated to strengthening your claim significantly making what seems like an uphill task quite achievable.

With this wide-ranging wealth of information, we sincerely hope that you begin hand-in-hand on your path towards recovery with us at Carlson Bier Group confident about seeking justice. All you need do now involves getting a step closer to unravelling your rightful entitlements regarding any compensations claimed stemming from dog-bite incidents sustained by yourself or loved ones under Illinois state laws… Together, we stand ready!

We invite you next to click on the button below – discover how much potentially could be claimed in terms of reimbursement specific towards offsetting losses incurred directly or indirectly following such distressful occurrences. Remember: Bringing onboard expertise doesn’t work just merely about claiming back reimbursements legally entitled following these incidents- it includes beginning rehabilitation on a surer note! Click below NOW and let’s commence this journey… together.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elsah Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Elsah

Areas of Practice in Elsah

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing professional legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Offering professional legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal services to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents get just remuneration for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to providing professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on assisting victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer