FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Englewood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Englewood, dog bite injuries can occur unexpectedly, causing traumatic physical damage and psychological distress. When such incidents happen, the representation of a dedicated attorney is crucial in pursuing legal recourse. Carlson Bier is an elite law group with significant expertise in dog bite injury cases across Illinois. This premier personal injury firm provides unparalleled service by ensuring that their clientele gets comprehensive legal assistance for their trauma caused due to canine attacks. From meticulous case preparation to aggressive advocacy at trial – each stage transpires under rigorous professional scrutiny and personalized attention from our attorneys’ expert team at Carlson Bier. The commitment we show towards each case reflects our medicinal knowledge about dog bites and subsequent injuries significantly differentiating us from other firms handling similar issues.. Being acknowledged with the victim’s pain signals compassion which isn’t just effort but also a mark of ethics for us . For anyone navigating the unsettling aftermath of a dog bite incident, your finest choice would be partnering with Carlson Bier as your trusted companion seeking justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Englewood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in the field of personal injury law with a staunch focus on Dog Bite Injuries. Our Illinois-based team is made up of experienced and steadfast lawyers who have a wealth of shared knowledge about the intricacies surrounding this specific area of law. Our past experiences handling Dog Bite Injury cases put us in a strong position to guide victims through these often complex processes.

Dog bite injuries can impose serious harm both physically and mentally. Moreover, it is important to remember the possibility for disease transmission as well as potential long-term psychological effects on those affected by such incidents. With an estimated 4.7 million dog bites occurring annually in the United States alone, it’s essential one understands their legal rights if they or someone close has faced such adversity.

Knowing that each case presents unique circumstances and details, our approach at Carlson Bier involves careful scrutiny of every single aspect tied to your case. This allows us to form sound strategies aimed at securing adequate compensation for damages from medical treatments, lost wages due to inability to work, pain and suffering caused by trauma, and added costs attached to rehabilitation processes including therapy for any emotional distress incurred.

Victims need assurance that liable parties are held accountable for actions leading up to unfortunate situations like dog bites. To give you an idea of what to expect when you work with Carlson Bier:

• We will gather all relevant information regarding your incident;

• Evidence required could include analysis from a local animal control report which discloses behavioral history relating to the offending animal;

• We may consider any documented proof like photographs

of physical injuries or testimonies from eyewitnesses;

• Medical records detailing treatment provided post-incident forms crucial pieces of such proofs too;

• It’s also necessary connecting with veterinary doctors owned by dog proprietors since they’re able corroborate behavioral patterns which might’ve directly contributed towards incidents culminating into an attack.

Illinois state laws provide protection for victims bitten in a non-trespassing sequence or in cases where they did not provoke the dog. Therefore, it is crucial to have legal representation by your side that has a complete grasp on such state laws and can efficiently navigate your case accordingly.

Trust Carlson Bier to exhibit utmost commitment when working with clients battling Dog Bite Injury lawsuits. Our aim is aiding you in receiving rightful compensation that softens financial burdens imposed by accident-related costs and helps facilitate as smooth of recovery process as possible. The journey may seem daunting initially, but remember that you do not need to face it alone.

Moreover, at Carlson Bier, we operate on a contingency fee basis. Meaning our professional fees are directly connected with success achieved in your personal injury lawsuit – if no favorable outcome is reached then you owe us nothing. We align our interests directly with yours- your victory translates to ours as well!

As experts in this complex area of personal injury law, we encourage reaching out for a free consultation during which our dedicated team will provide insights into what potential claims you may be eligible for considering unique circumstances tied to each individual’s plight.

Finally, if curious about specific worth potentially attached to your case – worry not! Simply click the button below and allow us guide towards understanding how much you could possibly receive following settlement negotiations or judicial verdicts closely aligned with facts surrounding incidents leading up towards undesirable exposure associated with dog bites attacks.

We stand prepared at the helm waiting eagerly offer comprehensive support throughout these challenging periods so don’t hesitate any further. Reach out today, let’s together write an end chapter confronting adversities head-on enroute charting suitable path structured around meeting future objectives without fear continued monetary strains caused due aftermath unfortunate accidents like those relating being bitten by dogs encountered outside controlled environments where expected behavior is usually predictable or docile nature rather than aggressive tendencies often seen situations leading severe injuries needing prompt medical attention owing severity wounds inflicted victims unexpected unprovoked attacks.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Englewood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Englewood

Areas of Practice in Englewood

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending expert legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring expert legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Professional in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents secure just settlement for injuries and damages.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering professional legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to providing specialized legal advice for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440