FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Englewood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the moments following a pedestrian accident, you may be inundated with hospital visits, medical bills, and emotional stress. Carlson Bier proudly stands as an unparalleled ally for these testing times in Englewood. As seasoned leaders in personal injury law with specialization in pedestrian accidents, we formulate strategic approaches for every case to ensure victims are justly compensated – covering past and future medical expenses, loss of income or earning capacity and other damages attributable to their unfortunate incident. Our meticulous understanding of Illinois law permits us to pursue legal remedies forthrightly on your behalf while maintaining a steadfast focus on your recovery journey. At Carlson Bier our commitment isn’t confined merely behind court walls; we fully engage ourselves beyond legal representation by closely collaborating with clients ensuring utmost comfort and ease throughout the process irrespective of how complex or straightforward a scenario might present itself initially. Trust in our extensive experience protecting pedestrians’ rights; let’s start this journey together towards seeking justice today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Englewood Illinois

Pedestrian accidents are alarming occurrences, causing severe physical, emotional, and financial implications. Carlson Bier is a dedicated personal injury law firm based in Illinois that represents you if you have become such a victim. With decades of experience under our belts, we give you the legal support and representation necessary to ensure your rights are protected and just compensation obtained.

Walking should be an everyday activity that feels safe for everyone but mishaps occur. Between distracted drivers failing to yield at marked crosswalks, as well as other causes associated with these accidents—such as speeding or intoxicated driving—the numbers have been steadily increasing over time. Being hit by a vehicle can cause significant injuries ranging from soft tissue damage to far more grim diagnoses like brain trauma or spinal cord injuries. If fate has led you down this unfortunate path, seeking immediate medical attention is crucial for your wellbeing; yet it’s equally important to consider legal help.

Experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier understand what you’re going through after such an ordeal: mounting medical bills coupled with lost wages from work absences can create heavy burdens on you and your family. Let us take some of the weight off your shoulders while we fight hard in pursuit of maximum damages owed to you!

Several key things distinguish us:

• Extensive experience in pedestrian accident cases

• Comprehensive understanding of Illinois laws

• Relentless advocacy for fair compensation

• Personalized attention throughout each case

We aim not only at securing suitable monetary gains but also strive towards holding negligent parties accountable to prevent similar tragedies from occurring again – making Illinois’ streets safer one court case at a time!

While being well-versed in Illinois state pedestrian law codes might sound robust enough, remember that every case possesses unique circumstances necessitating individual analysis combined with comprehensive strategy development—one size doesn’t fit all! Our skilled lawyer group keeps track of all substantial details traceable back to the incident while using their knowledge about insurance companies’ tactics helping clients get what they truly deserve.

To fully determine liability, it may be essential to recreate the scene of the accident and build a strong case backed by firm evidence. Our experts examine traffic patterns, surveillance video footage, witness testimony while aptly applying other useful investigative techniques. Under Illinois law, both motorist and pedestrian share responsibility on the road; hence it is possible for victims to hold partial blame for incidents. Yet their portion of damages needn’t completely nullify—it can be reduced proportionately in light of such contributory negligence.

Lastly yet crucially important to note: time boundaries exist when seeking compensation in Illinois – you generally must start legal proceedings within two years from the occurrence date of your accident (though exceptions may apply). Thus swift action equates retained rights and potential remedies; better comfort achieved through realized justice!

We understand taking this step might seem daunting but remember—you don’t have to go through it alone. We are ready to help pursue justice for you tirelessly, providing strong advocacy that never backs down even when faced with tough adversaries.

Navigating the intricacies of personal injury cases following a pedestrian accident can indeed be complex. But with experienced and committed representation like Carlson Bier lawyers provide at your side during trying times—who guided numerous people towards success—the journey seems less burdensome because quality counseling ensures efficiently litigated matters delivering satisfactory results!

Evidently then—don’t wait further! Allow us not only to assist you by shedding more light on your specific situation but also reveal how much compensation you maybe entitled based upon past cases we’ve dealt with similar circumstances before yours.

Why not find out what YOUR case is worth? Click on the button below right away—we remain ever-prepared standing by your side throughout strengthening our collective community along this relentless fight against recklessness!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Englewood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Englewood

Areas of Practice in Englewood

Bicycle Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving specialist legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering professional legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Incidents

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents secure fair compensation for harms and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Semi Crash

Providing expert legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on delivering specialized legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440