Medical Malpractice Attorney in Englewood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the intricate court system of medical malpractice can be challenging. Carlson Bier offers unparalleled support, expertise, and level-headed guidance to form your best line of defense. Every attorney in our team has an extensive track record in Everett Medical Malpractice law resulting from years of legal practice in Illinois. Choosing us means involving tireless advocates who possess both a deep understanding and passionate commitment to their client’s rights when medical negligence causes undue harm or trauma.

As adept trial lawyers, we meticulously investigate each case laid before us; acquiring critical evidence that strengthens every lawsuit we handle while building comprehensive legal strategies tailored to individual client needs. Throughout this process, it is not just about litigation for Carlson Bier; it’s about making sure truth prevails irrespective of the complexity involved.

Our profound impact on personal injury law attests to our dedication towards achieving favorable outcomes consistently – maximizing recoveries along with ensuring accountability from responsible parties at all times. The choice is clear: opt for confident representation with enduring results – choose Carlson Bier for your Medical Malpractice cases today!

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Englewood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expert team of dedicated personal injury lawyers capitalizes on years of robust professional experience in the vast and nuanced realm of Medical Malpractice law. Located in Illinois, we strive to leverage this vast experiential knowledge to champion the rights and interests of clients grappling with the aftermaths of medical oversights.

Encountering a medical malpractice situation can be disconcerting. When you entrust your health to a medical practitioner, the last thing you anticipate is negligence at their hands; however, such unfortunate incidents are more common than one may thought. It underscores how crucial it is for potential claimants to understand what constitutes medical malpractice.

Fundamentally, Medical Malpractice entails instances where a healthcare provider diverges from established medical standards leading to patient harm or loss. This deviation could occur through either action or lack thereof. Importantly, not every adverse outcome implies negligence.

It is worth noting some key elements that shape a valid Medical Malpractice case:

• Breach of Standard Care: The care you received didn’t meet the accepted norms within the industry.

• Injury directly caused by Negligence: An act of negligence specifically resulted in an injury.

• Significant damages due to Injury: There must be significant suffering – physical pain, enduring hardship, continuous loss of income or substantial future medical expenses.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier extends beyond merely fighting client cases; we believe ardently in equipping our clientele with dependable knowledge regarding their circumstance. From responsiveness needed when a malpractice issue arises to understanding how insurance comes into play- our focus lies on enhancing your comprehension about this complex domain.

Insurance plays an integral role in most malpractices cases. Your existing health insurance might cover parts of your costs after an instance of medical neglect but comprehensive reimbursement including lost incomes would need aggressing for rightful compensation via other channels which we expertly facilitate.

Another critical item is time sensitivity tied to these cases – Statutes of Limitation are essential regulations dictating the time period within which a medical malpractice suit can be filed. In Illinois, typically one must file a lawsuit within two years from when they realized or should have realized that they were hurt due to someone else’s actions; however, there exist caveats and exceptions.

Navigating the labyrinthine world of Medical Malpractice Law alone can be daunting. At Carlson Bier, we believe in setting this balance right – providing our clients with tenacious legal representation coupled with empathic understanding about their tribulations. Our seasoned cadre of lawyers and personalized client relations weave together a strong tapestry ensuring that your journey towards justice isn’t some solitary battle but rather a partnership anchored on our collective expertise.

By entrusting your case with us at Carlson Bier, you empower yourself to take control over an unfortunate situation and steer towards feasible resolutions – from carrying out investigations for discerning concrete proof & causality issues to undertaking rigorous negotiations with antagonistic insurance companies.

It is pertinent for potential claimants to understand what lays ahead in their quest for justice. Undeniably uncertainties prevail, preparing oneself adequately lets them take informed decisions empowered by contextual knowledge instead of fear.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier invites you now to gauge explicitly how we may aid you towards redressing your grievances. With a proven track record spanning across numerous successful cases over the years involving variable complexities – rest assured that your predicament will receive attentive attention combined with unyielding pursuit of justice here at Carlson Bier.

In light of this discussion and considering these complicating factors intrinsic within medical malpractice claims, it’s worth taking steps beyond contending these challenges solely armed by personal resilience or fortitude – professional help matters., especially one grounded in experiential wisdom like ours at Carlson Bier. As a next progression, reach down below and click on the button supporting you in deciphering precisely how much worthiest opportunity lies ahead in your claim. Assessment carries no obligation on your part; let’s step together into the realm of rightful justice within Medical Malpractice Law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Englewood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Englewood

Areas of Practice in Englewood

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending adept legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing expert legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Trip Incidents

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents receive just payout for damages and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Mishap

Delivering professional legal advice for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for damages.

Building Mishaps

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Committed to offering professional legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in defending clients with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer