Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Evanston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury is life-altering. In such trying times, what you need is an advocate who understands the nuances of your predicament. For those in Evanston seeking justice for their suffering, Carlson Bier stands as a beacon of hope and strength. With vast experience and proven success, our exceptional team specializes in handling complex spinal cord injuries cases with precision and skill.

At Carlson Bier, we strive to ensure that each case receives personal attention for optimal results. We understand the profound impact these injuries have on individuals’ lives; hence we dedicate ourselves to exploring every legal avenue available for our clients’ benefit.

Choosing us brings more than just representation – it’s welcoming an unwavering commitment towards obtaining due compensation for medical expenses or lost wages linked with these horrific incidents. Whether leveraging cutting-edge legal strategies or comprehensive investigations —our prowess defines us as undeniably incomparable among law firms dealing with spinal cord injuries-related litigations.

Let Carlson Bier be your voice during this difficult journey—we are committed to fighting alongside you relentlessly until justice prevails!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Evanston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that the potential complexity of a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) can be overwhelming. Often deemed as life-altering, SCIs bring forth not just physical changes but also emotional and social disruptions to the lives of those affected. As passionate advocates in the field of personal injury law and staunch supporters for justice in Illinois, our mission is to provide accurate, comprehensive, and accessible information about these conditions.

An SCI often results from any damage to any portion of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. This can cause permanent alterations in strength, sensation, and other bodily functions underneath where injuries occurred. Several key factors determine the severity and impact; including extent, location on spine – cervical being upper parts or lumbar as lower among others.

1. Cervical Spinal Injuries: These are usually severe type injuries which could result in paralysis or death.

2. Thoracic Spinal Injuries: Affecting chest-related muscle usage like breathing control

3. Lumbar & Sacral Spine Injuries: Lower back affecting legs movements.

Such underlying complexities require individualized medical attention adapted per case specifics noted above.

Another critical aspect surrounding SCIs is medical diagnosis coupled with treatment plans provided by healthcare experts- physiotherapy, occupational therapy all play an important role in helping ensure maximum possible recovery for victims alongside alleviating any associated pain issues felt physically after that unfortunate event strikes their lives so unexpectedly.

The road to recovery following an SCI is typically marked by significant medical expenses — hospital bills for surgical treatments and daily care needs add up quickly while long-term rehabilitation services don’t come cheap either – they’re needed to assist with returning back normal functioning levels post-injury eventually over time using various techniques as suggested based upon case-specific analysis done earlier on during basic first-hand evaluations conducted right after initial problem identification moments captured thanks largely due to modern-day technology-driven diagnosing equipment readily available today in most superior healthcare facilities across different parts of this world where such injuries are increasingly becoming common sight each passing day.

While handling these practical aspects, an under-discussed component is the emotional turmoil experienced by sufferers. This calls for compassionate professional assistance not only from the healthcare sector but also from legal professionals proficient with intricate nuances involved when coping up post-SCI life phases during different intermediate transition stages encountered therein.

At Carlson Bier, we take your concern to heart and work diligently to ensure that you get the maximum compensation for your suffering and expenses accrued owing to SCIs. Our expert team has extensive experience navigating the complex landscape of Illinois personal injury law towards ensuring a fair settlement apart from delivering valuable advice to victims/caregivers alike regarding what they should do next after having undergone unfortunate SCI-related incident at any given time point during their lives till now here in our honored state boasting rich historical yet youthful vibrancy inherent within its populous demographics spread unevenly across various regions covered broadly within geographical boundaries defining clearly its distinct identity worldwide per global standards norms.

Click on the button below now, enter your specific case details, and our competent staff will promptly provide approximate economic figures derived scientifically using predefined matrix determining potential worth associated individually concerning all important aspects considered holistically based upon information submitted hereby. Let us aid you in understanding how much justice Carlson Bier can help retrieve for you because every single life deserves complete respect granted full right through appropriate lawful channels maintained firmly under established democratic foundations lying inherently deep down beneath societal values nurtured carefully since beginning times immemorial remember always “Justice delayed is justice denied”.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Evanston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Evanston

Areas of Practice in Evanston

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing expert legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering expert legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Truck Accident

Ensuring professional legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Dedicated to representing clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer