...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fairfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one fallen victim to a distressing dog bite injury? Unfortunately, these incidents are all too common in Fairfield. When unanticipated trauma strikes, you need dedicated and clearly focused legal representation on your side—and that’s where the remarkable team at Carlson Bier, Personal Injury Lawyers of Illinois enters the frame. With a tried-and-proven track record in successfully navigating dog bite injury cases just like yours, our expertise is unmatched. Our competent attorneys passionately fight for maximum compensation possible on behalf of our clients so that they can focus on their recovery without overwhelming financial stress. We utilize careful investigation methods and comprehensive knowledge of Illinois Dog Bite law to strategically build robust lawsuit strategies tailored specifically to each client’s unique situation. Don’t fret about immense medical costs or bargaining with insurance companies—leave it to us while we vigorously defend your rights from beginning up until victorious closure ensuring justice is rightfully served —Choose Carlson Bier for efficient resolutions.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fairfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, an eminent personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we understand that experiencing a dog bite comes with a host of emotional distress and medical concerns. As experienced personal injury attorneys, our main objective is to provide you with comprehensive legal assistance if you’ve been injured by a dog bite.

Dog bites are often traumatizing events with potentially severe physical health implications. These injuries can progress to infections or scarring and may necessitate extensive clinical treatments such as surgery or rabies vaccinations. However, the mental and psychological impact must also be considered; victims frequently endure anxiety, fear, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Compounding these issues are the potential financial burdens accrued from hospital bills and therapeutic services.

• Dog bites can result in serious injuries or infections.

• Psychological effects such as trauma and PTSD are common among victims.

• Extensive medical treatment may be required.

Illinois law offers specific protections concerning animal attacks under its “strict liability” statute for dog owners. If their canine harms someone without provocation while they’re peacefully conducting themselves in any location where they’re legally entitled to be, that owner is liable for those damages.

Understanding your rights as a victim of a dog bite is crucial to securing the compensation you deserve for your ordeal. An experienced attorney at Carlson Bier familiar with Illinois’ strict liability laws will not only educate you on these regulations but also assist in navigating through what can sometimes seem like an arduous legal process as smoothly as possible!

One key factor affecting claim outcomes relates to determining negligence or recklessness on behalf of the dog’s handler prior to the occurrence of said incident. So remember:

• In Illinois, owners are held responsible if their dogs cause harm without provocation.

• The victim has lawful authority to be present at the location where the attack occurred.

• Even minor instances that lead to considerable anxiety qualify for compensation claims.

The professional team at Carlson Bier will meticulously gather all pertinent information, including medical records and any proof highlighting the owner’s pre-existing knowledge of their dog’s aggressive behavior. Our rigorous research helps build a strong case for you receiving due compensation for your physical injuries, emotional distress, and financial outgoings related to medical treatments.

• A competent attorney can simplify the legal process.

• We are highly adept at procuring conclusive evidence.

• Our profound understanding of Illinois law ensures optimal handling of your claim.

With Carlson Bier by your side, rest assured that we are fully committed to helping you through this challenging time. We are dedicated advocates who believe in fighting tooth and nail to ensure victims receive justice and appropriate restitution for their suffering.

Navigating the aftermath of dog bite can feel overwhelming. What if you could find out how much your case is potentially worth with just a few simple clicks? Don’t remain in suspense; click on the button below to ascertain an estimate for your personal injury claim! Pursuing legal recourse doesn’t have to be complicated – let us help guide you every step of the way.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fairfield

Areas of Practice in Fairfield

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering professional legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate payout for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Extending professional legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to offering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to defending individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer