...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Farmington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one experience dog bite injuries in Farmington, choosing the right legal representation is crucial. Look no further than Carlson Bier, your premier choice for personal injury claims related to dog bites. Our team understands that these incidents can be particularly traumatic and strive to lessen the burden through their nuanced understanding of Illinois legislation regarding such events. With our proven track record and years of experience in handling countless successful cases within this specialized domain, rest assured that we know how to fight for your rights confidently and efficiently against insurance companies. So why choose us? Because here at Carlson Bier, every case matters deeply as it’s not just about recovery; we value justice above all else. We meticulously prepare each case with intense attention-to-detail which sets us apart from others while retaining compassionate service during difficult times for you or your family members resulting from Dog Bite Injuries. Trusting Carlson Bier ensures personalized attention coupled with aggressive representation – the first step towards swift and fair compensation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Farmington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and hurdles that come with being a victim of a dog bite injury. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our dedicated attorneys offer unparallel legal representation, guiding you through this stressful time.

A dog bite incident can have severe ramifications, from physical injuries to emotional distress and loss of work. It is pivotal to familiarise yourself with your rights and the relevant laws related to such incidents due to their potentially severe consequences. Here’s what you need to know:

• Dog owner liability: In Illinois, the law places strict responsibility on dog owners for any harm their pet may cause.

• Statute of limitations: A victim has two years from the date of injury to pursue a negligence claim against the offending pet owner.

• Compensation possibilities: You’re entitled as a victim to seek damages for medical costs, lost wages due to inability to continue working temporarily or permanently amidst other losses incurred from the incident.

Furthermore, cases are evaluated depending upon certain criteria:

• Where was it possible for an individual reasonably anticipated being injured by a dog? If your presence was unlawful at the time of the incident—such as trespassing—the leash on liability might be much tighter.

• Did misuse or provocation precede biting? Often defendants in these cases will argue that your action somehow incited them. Proving otherwise could be paramount in getting awarded compensation.

Ensuring proper documentation following such unfortunate incidents aids not just treatment but also contributes substantially towards building a robust case:

– Medical Records: Showcasing clear records providing detailed accounts of injury severity alongside corresponding expenses provides concrete proof required when seeking claims.

– Photographic Evidence: Visual evidence taken immediately post-incident illustrating wounds advances credibility significantly.

– Eye-Witness Reports & Accurate Incident Reporting: Having timely statements from individuals present during said event strengthens case integrity alongside inclusion of precise details within official reports improves chances of appropriate justice served.

At Carlson Bier, be reassured of being represented by skilled and experienced attorney teams for your dog bite incident. Our approach is centered around understanding the particulars of your unique situation, optimizing strategies to fight vigorously on your behalf with an intimate knowledge of Illinois laws at our disposal.

However precarious or complicated things seem right now, have faith that we are here to guide you through this ordeal every step, offering dynamic legal solutions catering specifically to your case’s intricate details. Standing on the principles of integrity, robust representation, and fairness above all else, the core tenets act as guiding lights in our quest for justice on your behalf.

We sincerely hope you never need our services in such unfortunate circumstances. However, should you find yourself needing expert legal aid post a traumatic event like a dog bite injury; know that we are just a call away. We understand picking up that phone can indeed be overwhelming. So why not take the first step towards understanding what might lie ahead in terms of compensatory justice?

Yet struggling to comprehend how much worth does your case hold? Allay those doubts right away—simply click on the button below—to get started onto unraveling potential claims related to your specific situation today! Get the requirements evaluated from seasoned professionals standing advocate to hundreds before you navigating similarly through their paths seeking desired compensations eventually.

Remember: You’re not alone – let us help simplify complexities ensuring justified compensation awaiting along this journey fraught otherwise with daunting uncertainties efficiently turns out within reach favorably due course ultimately alongside team Carlson Bier taking care from start till end indeed optimistically.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farmington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Farmington

Areas of Practice in Farmington

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying expert legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents get appropriate payout for harms and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Incident

Extending specialist legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Harms

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​