...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Farmington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Offering first-class legal representation, Carlson Bier stands at the forefront of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) litigation. Our team of dedicated solicitors understands the devastating impact SCI can have, causing physical pain and emotional distress while disrupting every aspect of life. We specialize in providing personalized legal services to ensure your unique needs and concerns are efficiently addressed. At Carlson Bier, we pursue justice relentlessly for our clients who have suffered spinal injuries due to vehicle collisions, work-related incidents or medical malpractices within Illinois. With an impressive track record of winning significant compensation claims over several years, our firm is recognized as a leader in handling spinal injuries cases effectively and with empathy. Our unmatched dedication to accuracy ensures that relevant evidence is comprehensively evaluated to attain favorable outcomes for you. Your journey towards regaining normalcy after traumatic injury requires resilient advocacy—let us be your beacon during these stormy times; turning consults into victory by employing unrivaled strategies for every case remains our unwavering commitment at Carlson Bier—we are more than just lawyers; we are defenders on a mission!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Farmington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on providing competent legal services to our clients in Illinois who are victims of personal injuries, particularly those related to spinal cord injuries. Our specialization in this complex area clearly sets us apart as a trusted law firm with the knowledge and expertise required to advocate for your rights and to help you secure fair compensation.

Spinal cord injuries can seriously affect your quality of life, producing disabling consequences that capability not just the physical but also the psychological and financial aspects of life. They often result from traumatic occurrences such as automobile accidents, falls, or violent acts; although non-traumatic causes such as arthritis, inflammation, infections or disc disease could also lead to similar detrimental outcomes.

• Detrimental impact on mobility: Spinal cord injuries may impair movement either partially (paraplegia) or completely (quadriplegia).

• Sensory disruption: It’s typical for affected individuals to experience numbness or unexpected sensations indicative of nerve damage.

• Respiratory problems: Depending on the degree of injury, respiratory complications like difficulty breathing may arise.

• Mental health concerns: Unsurprisingly, facing these hardships can trigger anxiety disorders and depression.

In handling spinal cord injury cases at Carlson Bier, we adopt a meticulous approach that includes thorough evaluation of medical reports, consultations with health experts if necessary and comprehensive examination of any contributing circumstances surrounding the incidence. This holistic strategy allows us to build compelling arguments aimed at securing optimal settlements for our injured clients.

Besides recovering funds for overwhelming medical expenses inclusive of initial emergency treatment cost intensive long-term care expense due to spinal cord injury repercussions – rehabilitation sessions…, Carlson Bier can help you acquire appropriate compensation for factors not generally considered insurer companies regularly exclude e.g. income loss while recuperating , future reduction earning capacity potential financial hardship chronological therapeutic journey might raise emotional suffering stress resultant lifestyle adaptation constraints quality life disturbance negative turn enjoyment day-to-day activities drastically reduced after-effect serious vitally central nerve damage employer liability incidents company accidents involved.

Moreover part our comprehensive service Carlson Bier, we maintain open communication lines with each client throughout the duration of their case – from consultation to successful conclusion. We believe that keeping you fully informed and engaged in every step of the journey is integral to a fair resolution.

Every spinal cord injury patient’s strife demands recognition justice for his or her ordeal. Rest assured that at Carlson Bier, our duty transcends ensuring your legal rights are protected; it extends empathetically towards understanding how such adverse circumstances have disturbed life equilibrium community potential subsequent many following undesirable consequences proper treatment compensatory damages specific case deserves honesty integrity backbone core services offer ultimately define us as Illinois’ preferred personal injury attorney group.

Determining value a potential claim involving spinal cord injuries can be complicated due complexities associated accurately calculating extensive costs related initial ongoing medical facilities rehabilitation lost income effect earning capacity emotional stress long-term psychological impacts future prognoses these factors considered when pursuing compensation cases this magnitude intricate requires an extraordinary level expertise thankfully find at Carlson Bier.

Knowing the monetary worth of your circumstance is vitally important, as this plays a pivotal role in securing your financial future post-injury —not only does it enable adequate planning but also helps in tempering anxieties about unforeseen medical expenses and more. For further guidance on navigating this daunting process, make use of the button below which provides insights into how much your case could be worth. Remember: Every situation is unique—personalized evaluation lies at the heart of truly effective representation offered by Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Farmington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Farmington

Areas of Practice in Farmington

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering specialist legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Offering experienced legal representation for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Stumble Mishaps

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents receive reasonable payout for wounds and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal support for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to extending professional legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Specializing in representing victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer