FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Farmington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, securing legal representation from experts in the field is imperative. Carlson Bier offers clients unparalleled service and support as leading personal injury lawyers specializing in pedestrian accidents. Even though Illinois’s law stipulates an attorney must not advertise without a physical presence within a given city, our dedication to assisting victims throughout various locations cannot be understated. Though we have earned distinction statewide due to consistent results marked by successful settlements or verdicts for those who’ve suffered significant injuries while on foot, it’s worth considering us even if your case unfolds beyond Farmington. Our team relentlessly fights for justice and optimal compensation that reflects damages endured emotionally and physically after such harrowing incidents- lost earnings potential along with treatment costs included. Trusting Carlson Bier equates to partnering with a firm vested wholly in your recovery journey through its unwavering commitment coupled with unmatched expertise – beneficial assets across all scenes – including areas like Farmington – that you simply can’t overlook!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Farmington Illinois

Carlson Bier, a distinguished entity in Illinois’ legal landscape, specializes in personal injury law with considerable expertise concentrated on pedestrian accidents. A pedestrian accident tragically occurs when an individual walking or running is involved in an accident with any form of motorized vehicle or cyclist, causing physical harm, mental distress and often life-altering consequences. Such events can disturb the normality of life and thrust upon unforeseen medical expenses, loss of livelihood along with intense emotional trauma.

Understanding the scope of a pedestrian accident involves recognizing its various types. These may range from Hit-and-run incidents where drivers despicably leave without identifying themselves or offering help to the injured Sober motorists who mistakenly hit pedestrians due to distracted driving, bad weather conditions or simple oversight. Yet another severe instance includes Intoxicated-driving incidents that remain one of the most prolific causes of these mishaps because alcohol significantly impairs judgment and slows down reaction time.

Most pedestrian accidents usually take place at crosswalks intersections while making left-hand turns; parking lots are notorious for such calamities as well owing to passengers exiting parked vehicles suddenly into an oncoming traffic pathway. It’s important to remember that under Illinois state laws, pedestrians always have the right-of-way in any traffic situation; thus ensuring their protection becomes everyone’s collective responsibility.

• Specific factors contributing to these accidents might include Reckless Driving encompassing speeding over limits set up by local highway authorities leading often to tragic outcome.

• Distraction – multitasking like texting while driving commands dangerous precedence.

• Failure to follow traffic signs: ignoring stop signs or signals keeps pushing the statistics higher every year

• Driving Under Influence – Alcohol-drugs seriously impair abilities resulting drastic rise middle night collisions

At Carlson Bier, we work relentlessly towards safeguarding your rights if you’ve been unfortunate enough to be involved in one such incident through no fault of yours. Our superior technical understanding founded on vast experience allows us reliably analyze all applicable rules, statutory provisions and case law precedents to bring forth a compelling representation for your cause.

It’s crucial to comprehend that compensation in these cases is often predicated upon proving the negligence of the involved party. It requires establishing owing duty, its breach leading directly to injury and the subsequent damage caused thereby. The compensation may additionally cover mental anguish along imminent future expenses tied to ongoing medical treatment.

The legal nuances associated with pedestrian accidents demand seasoned advocates like us who can navigate complex pathways involving insurance companies notoriously tough at denying fair payouts unless legally compelled. Our track recorddespite their relentless attempts testifies our ability secure just compensation ensuring optimal medical care and recovery without getting burdened by mounting bills.

We firmly believe that you deserve proper compensatory relief for losses amidst such distressing times alongside holding guilty parties responsible for their negligent actions. From culling out critical evidence identifying key witnesses, conducting exhaustive negotiations to trials wherever needed; our dedicated attorneys promise unwavering support throughout this tumultuous journey towards justice phenomenally minimizing worries taking stress off.

One last point but certainly not least – one must act swiftly after an accident so valuable evidence isn’t lost or overlooked, which could be detrimental eventually as memory fades recall becomes vague while physical proofs might get eliminated causing serious setback seeking legitimate claim. So never delay consulting an attorney!

At Carlson Bier, we empathetically understand the debilitating impact this experience has had on your life. We are committed to help guide you through it with utmost compassion, expertise and resilience so brighter days lie ahead sooner than later. To find accurate value for potential compensation best suited for your unique circumstances, please click on the button below taking a very significant step forward towards attaining much deserved justice. Remember – Every step counts!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farmington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Farmington

Areas of Practice in Farmington

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending expert legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing specialist legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents obtain fair compensation for damages and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending experienced legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to providing specialized legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Expert in supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440