...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Flanagan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can be a traumatic and complex event. The process of lawfully addressing such personal injuries requires an experienced team – consider Carlson Bier, renowned for their specialized expertise in the realm of Dog Bite Injuries. Based in Illinois, these skilled attorneys fully comprehend both state stipulations and local ordinances intricately associated with these cases. Undeniably, they exhibit unparalleled dedication towards their clients’ needs throughout every stage of litigation or negotiation proceedings. Rest assured that with Carlson Bier handling your case, you’re not just provided legal representation; you receive unwavering support focused on securing maximum due compensation for incurred losses – medical bills to emotional distress included. Their unbeatable reputation stems from consistent success achieved through fierce advocacy paired with compassionate guidance which ensures justice is sought swiftly and effectively where dog bite injuries are concerned.

With their respected track record spanning the regionalscape surrounding Flanagan even further beyond across The Prairie State , do reach out to discuss how Carlton Bier Law Firm will serve as your dedicated champion pursuing rightful accountability & considerable recompense after an unfortunate canine attack incident today!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Flanagan Illinois

Living in Illinois, it is critical to understand how personal injuries, especially dog bite injuries, can affect your life. As a dedicated and respected law firm, Carlson Bier deeply values providing comprehensive information pertinent to such cases. Equipped with years of practical experience and robust knowledge about the state’s legal landscape, we provide meticulous assistance as personal injury attorneys for dog bites.

Firstly, there’s predicting the extent of physical and emotional trauma one might endure from a dog bite incident is near impossible; ramifications can markedly vary from person to person. Minor inflammations could escalate into serious infections if not tended to immediately while merely witnessing an attack might cause severe emotional distress in certain individuals. This underpins why prompt legal consultation becomes vital following such instances.

To reinforce our commitment towards ensuring your right to safety prevails unimpeached, here are some key aspects of handling dog bite injuries in Illinois:

• Establishing Ownership – In Illinois, the injured victim must be able to unequivocally establish that the defendant owns the attacking animal. Proving this fundamental detail permits claim legitimacy and bolsters chances of receiving deserved compensation.

• Documentation – Having verifiable proof plays an enormous role in winning dog-bite litigation. This includes medical reports indicating severity of sustained injuries or photographs evidencing prevalent wounds that conclusively denote an earlier canine attack.

• Strict Liability Rule – Should you happen upon misfortune involving menacing dogs poised for harm despite prior docile behaviour records, rest assured knowing that owner liability would still hold valid under strict adherence to legislation guiding animal behaviour within jurisdictional boundaries at Illinois.

Recognizing these factors significantly enhances comprehension surrounding gravity often accorded autonomy of movement by pet owners whilst simultaneously putting importance on shared outdoor spaces into clearer perspective.

Moreover, bystanders bearing witness might produce veritable proof during court processes since their accounts drawn up over proceedings inadvertently affects decision outcomes greatly either swaying verdicts altogether or establishing grounds necessary for leveraging fair compensation deals.

Navigating these complex legalities is often overwhelming, particularly when trying to cope with resulting perturbations from unsettling incidents. As Carlson Bier, we believe that no one should bear the burden alone; lending formidable levels of support during these taxing periods forms part and parcel of our inherent ethos as professionals consistently striving towards serving justice at every given opportunity.

Oftentimes, irrespective of how ferocious or eventually fatal injuries turn out being, full extents at which victims find themselves affected remain innately indeterminable until closer examinations culminate in conclusive insights. This is a vital notion since it directly correlates with determining what comprises fair compensation post such unfortunate predicaments.

Whether you’ve been bitten by a hostile canine, know someone who has experienced this harrowing ordeal firsthand or just hope for ample knowledge against potential future incidents, comprehending nuances involved in securing comprehensive protection under prevailing laws becomes absolutely essential – ultimately providing immeasurable value within people’s lives seeking respite whenever necessary.

At Carlson Bier, we’re unwaveringly committed to walking you through this convoluted path towards successfully obtaining deserved recompense whilst offering requisite advice all along. Shedding light on regulation intricacies paired alongside delivering efficient professional services remains our core mission – fostering trust while ensuring positive case outcomes are secured evenly across board whether dealing with straightforward reactions bordering inevitability following offensive animal behaviours outdoors or otherwise.

If you’re grappling with any unsettled feelings provoked from disruptive dog bite encounters pushing anxieties onto psychological forefronts slowly starting outweigh considerations bound within normative spheres life maintains outside such engrossing trauma circles, click the button below. We extend invitation urging you discover more essential information capable of assisting effective journey navigation coursing through Illinois’ maze of rules that govern personal injury cases involving canine offences back into serene space unhindered living evermore demands each individual’s attention tirelessly but seldom yields sans guidance expert allies readily prepared providing immediate seasoned assistance upon formal engagement instances. Allow us, at Carlson Bier, to help you discover your case’s worth and chart the effective path towards obtaining justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Flanagan Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Flanagan

Areas of Practice in Flanagan

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering professional legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Delivering expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Accidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents receive equitable recompense for hurts and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Crash

Offering specialist legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to delivering specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Expert in defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer