Medical Malpractice Attorney in Forest Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking resolution in medical malpractice concerns within Forest Park, consider Carlson Bier – a distinguished Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases. Committed to delivering justice for victims of negligence and professional errors, our dedicated team offers unparalleled expertise that makes us the best consideration for unwavering advocacy. In all assertions of medical malpractice, we tirelessly strive to protect your rights with legal proficiency honed through years of experience navigating complex healthcare environments. With Carlson Bier by your side, quality representation is guaranteed as you reclaim rightful compensation from distressing medical occurrences. Let their proven track record reassures you amidst stressful periods; promote recovery backed by justice served effectively and efficiently within Forest Park’s legal parameters without indicating residency in Forest Park itself – adhering strictly to Illinois laws pertaining client-proscriber relations. For fair judgment under superior counsel delivered with utmost integrity and respect towards individual circumstances, put trust where precedence safeguards legality – choose Carlson Bier for exceptional Medical Malpractice litigation services.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Forest Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our extensive expertise in Illinois personal injury law and our unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of our clients. Our seasoned litigators specialize in handling a broad spectrum of personal injury claims, including medical malpractice. We understand that medical errors can have devastating effects, not just physically but emotionally and financially as well.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from the recognized “standard of care” in treating a patient under their care, leading to harm or injury. This standard refers to what a competent health care professional would have reasonably done or avoided under similar circumstances. As such, it serves as an essential factor when determining whether malpractice has occurred.

Navigating through the complexities of a medical malpractice case requires an intuitive understanding of both legal and medical aspects involved. Hence at Carlson Bier, we meticulously investigate each case’s unique facets to build strong arguments for our clients by:

– Thoroughly reviewing all your medical records

– Engaging seasoned experts who scrutinize the evidence and verify whether there was deviation from accepted standards

– Working relentlessly to establish clear causality links between the supposed negligence and subsequent harm

It is crucial to remember that every claim within this realm will bear its unique nuances; no two cases are precisely alike. For example, while surgical errors might mitigate one case’s specifics, another could center around birth injuries or wrongful prescriptions’ overtones. Understanding these varied forms matters involve expert insight into diverse areas – something we at Carlson Bier take great pride in providing.

It is also noteworthy that states observe different time limits concerning when you must file your claim (known as statutes of limitations). In many instances regarding Illinois law including Medical Malpractice actions specifically occur within 2 years from when you’ve either discovered your injury/illness or could have reasonably expected to discover it based on facts available – whichever date comes first—coupled with another provision mandating you file within “4 years from the date when the act giving rise to this injury or death” occurred, an exercisable loophole exists in certain situations that hinge on intentionally concealed facts.

At Carlson Bier, apart from informing customers of their rights under Illinois law, we deliver unparalleled legal representation aimed at achieving maximum compensation for your damages. We understand that navigating life post a medical mishap can be incredibly challenging. Consequently, our goal remains delivering services covering but not limited to:

– Compensation for physical and emotional pain

– Reimbursement for lost wages

– Coverage of present and future medical bills

Moreover, if a loved one unfortunately succumbs due to alleged malpractice, we help families hold the healthcare provider accountable while seeking rightful damage recovery – there’s simply no substitute for justice!

Your journey forward does not have to be tread alone; Carlson Bier is ready to stand in your corner. We invite you to click on the button below and explore how much your case could potentially be worth with preliminary analysis – all embedded in unyielding professionalism. Remember, understanding one’s situation serves as the cornerstone towards securing fair outcomes. Begin your path forward today with Carlson Bier by demanding what’s truly yours.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forest Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Forest Park

Areas of Practice in Forest Park

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering adept legal advice for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering specialist legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Collisions: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents get fair recompense for wounds and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing experienced legal support for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for damages.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Harms

Expert in offering professional legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to assisting victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer