FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Forreston

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a bicycle accident in Forreston, seek sound legal counsel from Carlson Bier. We lead with years of meticulous expertise, focusing exclusively on personal injury law cases. Understanding the situational complexity of bike-related incidents, our attorneys provide strategic guidance to navigate the numerous variables that can arise post an accident. What sets us apart from others? Foremost, it is our relentless dedication towards protecting victim rights while ensuring the fair compensation they rightfully deserve for incurred damages or injuries. With Carlson Bier representing your case, rest assured we will vigorously scrutinize every detail down to its microscopic fiber making no room for compromise on justice served. Our thorough understanding of Illinois’ specific nuances and subtleties ensures a robust lawsuit formation leaving no stone unturned under our competent watch. At Carlson Bier, we believe not just in providing service but creating relationships built upon trust and success. Entrust your situation to us; let’s fight this battle together!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Forreston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our topmost priority is to offer exceptional legal services tailored to cater to personal injury victims. Renowned in Illinois for our accumulated expertise and rich experience, we have specifically carved out an integral service dedicated to bicycle accidents. Knowledge is the first step towards achieving justice. Understanding this, we aim at educating you about bicycle accidents and applicable laws in order to equip you with necessary information aiding your pursue towards justice.

Bicycle accidents are more common than perceived and their impact can range from minor cuts or bruises to catastrophic events that may change one’s course of life forever. A significant number of these incidents can be traced back to driver negligence, poorly maintained roads and a lack of proper cycling infrastructure among others.

Factors influencing the severity of a bicycle accident include the speed at which the collision occurs, whether or not a helmet was worn and the angle of impact during crash. In addition, another key determinant might very well be related to vehicle design where certain features like side guards could play a crucial role.

When injured in such an unfortunate event, it’s critical that victims and their families understand their rights according to law before deciding on their next course of action:

• As per Illinois law, bicyclists enjoy the same rights as other roadway users; hence bear no underlying bias when involved in an accident.

• The law mandates that motorists should provide cyclists with sufficient space while overtaking them. Violation often translates into grounds for personal injury claims.

• If a cyclist gets hit by a car door opened without reasonable safety precautions (known as “dooring”), they’re entitled for compensation under state law.

Educating yourself on what constitutes evidence is yet another essential aspect for successfully navigating through your claim process following a bike mishap:

• Often overlooked but eye-witness accounts serve as pivotal pieces of evidence.

• Photographs documenting injuries sustained or damage inflicted greatly aid legal processes.

• Surveillance footage from nearby security cameras might also hold the potential to sway a case in your favor.

• Receipts and bills for any medical treatment undergone post accident are integral to determining the compensation amount among others.

Navigating through these legal subtleties can indeed be overwhelming, especially when someone is grappling with physical and emotional trauma post a bike collision. At Carlson Bier, our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys eases this ride for you by shouldering your legal burden allowing you to focus on recuperation. It’s our responsibility to untangle this web of laws and loop-holes in order for justice to prevail. Our seasoned lawyers possess profound knowledge about intricacies linked with bicycle accidents cases making them an ideal advocate fighting on your behalf.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that financial constraints shouldn’t hold back anyone from seeking justice. Hence, we operate on a ‘no win no fee’ basis liberating our clients from hefty upfront costs or charges during the course of litigation process unless there’s a successful recovery.

Your trust forms the cornerstone of our services as we pledge complete transparency along every step of this journey together. We understand how intimidating it could be if you’re knee-deep in myriad legal complexities while recovering from physical injuries! Therefore, we have provided below an easy means for estimating what your case might potentially be worth just at the click of a button.

Click on the button below now!

This simple act could open up new possibilities ensuring measureable progress in your quest towards rightful compensation and simultaneously providing us with another opportunity to uphold justice – something that Carlson Bier takes immense pride in being associated with across Illinois. So, turn this prospective collaboration into reality today using this interactive feature deployed right below assuring zero obligations at your end – A promising start towards achieving rightful compensation!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forreston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Forreston

Areas of Practice in Forreston

Bicycle Crashes

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving expert legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Mishaps

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents secure just remuneration for damages and losses.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Crash

Providing adept legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440