...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Forreston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

With a longstanding reputation for legal excellence, Carlson Bier represents clients across the spectrum, including those with spinal cord injuries. Our depth of experience and committed advocacy earned us a trusted name when it comes to handling such sensitive matters. Spinal cord injuries can dramatically impact one’s quality of life—a reality that we understand profoundly at Carlson Bier.

Perhaps you’ve suffered this disruption due to negligence or unsafe conditions; we take these transgressions very seriously as they can forever alter your livelihood while imposing burdensome costs unexpectedly. In such scenarios, choosing an experienced attorney is paramount in ensuring justice is served.

So why choose Carlson Bier? We bring unparalleled expertise in dealing with challenging cases surrounding spinal cord injuries—which typically require special understanding regarding medical aspects besides legal ones—plotting out strategies tailored specifically to achieve our client’s best possible resolution.

Our jurisdiction ranges from Forreston and beyond; however, irrespective of where you’re based within Illinois, considering our long-established presence and powerful performance on behalf of spinal cord injury victims should be your next step towards securing rightful compensation for damages endured.

Please discuss the particulars over a consultation—the guiding hands at Carlson Bier are ready to serve you diligently.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Forreston Illinois

The Carlson Bier law firm is deeply ingrained in the legal landscape of Illinois as a highly esteemed personal injury attorney group. Our specialization pivots around an array of personal injuries, but we hold particular expertise in spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries can be intensely catastrophic, leading to irreversible life changes and immense medical costs for treatment and rehabilitation.

Spinal cord injuries stem from damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. This type of calamitous harm can result in loss of strength, sensation, and other body functions below the site of injury. Regrettably, there are currently no solutions that can entirely reverse this damage. At Carlson Bier, our role is not just legal representation; we also stand with you all through these challenging times for informational support.

Sufferers of such debilitating conditions need to understand certain key points about their condition:

• Existing treatments focus on preventing further injury while enabling victims to return as closely as possible to active and productive lives.

• Research especially aims at discovering ways to prevent cell death, control inflammation after initial injury, promote nerve regeneration, replace lost cells.

• Rehabilitation therapies comprise physical therapy focused on mobility skills alongside occupational therapy aimed at daily activities.

• Technological aids that help restore function include functional electrical stimulation systems or computer adaptations beneficial for communication.

Shouldering a spinal trauma is devastating enough without having the financial concerns related to health care expenses unnecessarily adding onto your burden. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in. We work tirelessly towards securing optimal compensation for your pain & suffering along with meeting enormous healthcare expenditure needs due to such accidents.

Illinois law demands strict adherence concerning safety regulations meant primarily towards avoiding risks leading up-to such severe impairments like Spinal Cord Injuries. But when these guidelines get flaunted leading up-to accidents causing such catastrophic incidents like SCI (Spinal Cord Injury), it becomes crucially important you seek out qualified representation ensuring the responsible parties account for their judiciousness.

At Carlson Bier, we take a thorough and methodical approach to represent litigants enduring spinal cord damage resulting from personal injury. We take pride in prompted by an earnest commitment towards providing excellent representation for all our clients regardless of the complexity or challenges of each case. Our practice spans across Illinois while ensuring absolute compliance with local regulations concerning business locations.

Our experienced attorneys follow a strategic process founded on comprehensive investigations to determine accident causation followed by rigorous preparation aimed at strong court representations or negotiations as applicable in your case scenario. Notably, this legal battle is not just about claiming compensation, but also seeking justice against the people or entities whose negligence caused you harm; be it manufacturing companies with faulty products or lackadaisical construction agencies overlooking basic safety principles.

Now that you have been enriched with insightful knowledge about Spinal Cord Injuries courtesy Carlson Bier- trusted Personal Injury Attorney group based in Illinois, why let those questions plague your mind any longer? Click on the button below to find out how much your case might be worth. Remember, no financial amount can make up for the physical pain and emotional trauma caused due to SCI accidents. However, securing fair reparation may ease the burden and help you progress towards recovery without financial stress lurking over your healing journey. Trust us with your fight; let us champion hard-hitting negotiation or litigation battles while you concentrate fully upon regaining optimal health amidst love & support of near ones, assured you are represented by an astute team who simply refuses anything less than rightful justice for its patrons!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Forreston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Forreston

Areas of Practice in Forreston

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Slip Injuries

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Crash

Extending adept legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Site Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Committed to offering compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to defending victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer