...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Forreston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When confronted with the traumatic aftermath of a dog bite incident in Forreston, your first call should be to Carlson Bier. We are proven advocates for victims facing devastating consequences of such incidents, boasting extensive experience and knowledge within this specialized field. Respected throughout Illinois for our proficiency in personal injury law, we have an exceptional track record dealing specifically with dog bite cases like yours. It’s imperative choosing attorneys who understand the complexities surrounding these cases; at Carlson Bier you’ll find just that – experienced lawyers committed to diligently fight for justice on your behalf. With us by your side – expertly guiding you through every legal step protecting all your rights effectively – be assured we leave no stone unturned pursuing maximum compensation available under the strict Illinois dog bite laws for injuries is our principal concern . Handling multiple successful settlements reflecting our commitment and dedication towards clients’ needs, choose Carlson Bier confidently as YOUR advocacy partner after a debilitating dog attack.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Forreston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your recovery is paramount. We’re an experienced and dedicated law firm specializing in personal injury cases based proudly out of Illinois. One area which we emphasize is Dog Bite Injuries, a much too common form of personal harm that may leave victims traumatized along with serious physical injuries.

Dog bites can lead to severe consequences varying from painful lacerations and scars to debilitating emotional trauma. This territory also includes potential infections, diseases transmitable through animals like rabies, not to mention the high chances of psychological complications such as fear or anxiety disorders linked directly to the incident. Such unforeseen mishaps are often overwhelming for victims and their families when navigating the maze of medical care seeking justice through legal avenues.

This situation frequently brings forth pertinent questions on compensation legitimacy after a dog bite case. Key factors come into play here including proof confirmation that the specific dog caused your injuries, visible demonstration on how this incident has negatively affected your life personally and professionally whilst contributing evidence proving negligence by the dog’s owner at staying on top of safety measures ensuring that their pet does not pose any risk in public areas or venues.

It’s important to note how each state functions differently when deciphering laws related to dog bites. Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ guidelines concerning these matters meaning owners are held accountable for damages inflicted by their pets regardless if they were unaware of animal’s violent tendencies before attack events took place; unlike some jurisdictions justifying owner obligations solely if aware prior about potential danger caused by aggressive behavior characteristics shown by dogs previously attacking others without provocation.

Carlson Bier has dealt with numerous situations involving such complicated dynamics offering representatives having comprehensive experience in tackling intimate complexities that abound within this niche enabling us strategizing precise game plans aptly applying legislative nuances pertaining uniquely towards Illinois jurisdiction succeeding maximum settlement claims surpassing millions recovered for clients until date affected tragically due similar incidents involving pet attacks unpredictably disrupting peaceful daily lives taking dramatic detour towards hospital corridors and courtrooms thereafter.

To forge ahead amidst such personal upheavals requires an experienced ally in your corner, ready to fight for the just compensation you deserve. That’s where we step into the frame. Drawing upon our considerable expertise in dog bite law, we aim to bring balanced understanding to clients about their rights, streamline the litigation process and tirelessly work towards securing optimal results reflective of your suffering and loss.

While every case is unique, victims may typically be eligible for compensation covering medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, pain and suffering damages as well as lost wages due to substantial time off work during recovery periods. Our legal team’s dedicated efforts mean you can focus entirely on healing while we handle everything else taken care by building a robust claim substantiated with compelling supporting evidence targeting award-winning results through sound consultation techniques tailored accordingly to specific client needs upheld uncompromisingly respecting confidentiality elements strictly adhered transparently alongside professional dedication committed truly at Carlson Bier redefining excellence with responsible execution practices implemented passionately driven helping sincere hearts heal faster after undesired mishaps extending genuinely harmonious promise rebuilding lives together starting afresh from ink blots punctuating conclusive summaries resonating silently within documents echoing louder outside courtroom walls breathing life back reflecting hope brightly again across innocent eyes veiled behind tears yesterday illuminating tomorrow brightly welcoming promising new dawns opening encouraging chapters rewritten gladly with smiling faces shining brilliantly towards limitless blue skies defining dreams unfading buzzing optimistically forever thereafter containing reread storylines linked wonderfully touching bonds establishing heartfelt connections exclusively celebrating joyous victory moments cherished deeply forever.

Let Carlson Bier be integral in navigating this challenging journey bringing resolutions swiftly compensating deserved justice following unfortunate events unraveling out of unexpected canine encounters disturbing regular rhythm left knocking knocking unexpectedly on destiny doors stepping onto unfamiliar territories unplanned striking harsh chords piercing tranquil symphony formerly enjoyed blissfully replaced suddenly by traumatic accident sequences distracting smooth strolls down calm sidewalk lanes turned upside hastily wounding unsuspected victims hurt emotionally and physically in the process crafting hurtful memories sadly narrating unwelcome tales whispered quietly amidst healing whispers heard tenderly around comforting cornerstones mapped strategically across dotted lines framing life’s unpredictable canvas painted beautifully with vibrant colors blending magically remembered warmly recollected soothingly forever.

One simple click could potentially change everything for you. Seek an evaluation today to find out what your case may be worth. The legal team at Carlson Bier is standing by ready to provide the support, guidance, and representation that Dog Bite Injury victims need in this critical moment as they battle for a fair resolution. You have made it this far through resilience; allow us to take the journey further with you towards substantial compensation and lasting peace of mind.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forreston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Forreston

Areas of Practice in Forreston

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing skilled legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering expert legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Trip Occurrences

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering experienced legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in extending dedicated legal representation for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in supporting individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer