Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Fox River Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury can dramatically change your life. The severity of such injuries often leads to substantial medical costs, loss of income, as well as physical and emotional pain. When faced with this upheaval, you deserve the best legal representation from seasoned professionals like Carlson Bier. As respected personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we specialize in handling cases involving spinal cord injuries. Our commitment stretches beyond legal representation; we strive to be pillars of support for our clients throughout their recovery journey. Over the years, we have excelled by navigating through complex litigations and winning favorable compensations for our clients across numerous localities including Fox River Grove area – diligently restoring peace and financial stability back into their lives without compromising on integrity or ethical standards.

Choosing us means picking a group of highly committed advocates who prioritize your wellbeing above all else while relentlessly striving towards securing just restitution for our esteemed clientele plagued by these detrimental incidents.

When redefining your future following a grave spinal cord injury is paramount – choose Carlson Bier where expertise meets compassion; not merely alongside but championing those through such tumultuous journeys every day.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Fox River Grove Illinois

As esteemed professionals in the field of personal injury law, Carlson Bier has amassed significant experience and expertise serving our clients across Illinois. A focal area of our legal practice remains Spinal Cord Injuries – a devastating health ordeal that interrupts normal life functionality requiring multifaceted medical interventions and complex litigation measures.

In an effort to empower you with essential knowledge about spinal cord injuries, we have curated enlightening content that simplifies this intricate topic for anyone irrespective of their legal or medical background.

Spinal cord injuries predominantly manifest from severe physical trauma such as vehicle accidents, falls, sport-related incidents, and acts of violence among others. However, determining the cause is paramount since it lays the foundation for successful compensation claims. As a victim dealing with spinal cord injury issues:

• You may be eligible for extensive compensation: Securing substantial financial remedies concerning lost wages, medical expenses (both current and future), rehabilitation costs plus pain and suffering call for experienced representation.

• Thorough documentation is pivotal: Comprehensive collection and systematic management of medical records play an integral role in proving the extent of your injury’s impact on daily tasks as well as personal relationships.

Considering the catastrophic nature oak these injuries; patients not only endure physical distress but also emotional turmoil along with financial strain due to towering healthcare costs coupled with loss of income. It becomes incumbent within this context to fight aggressively (yet empathetically) towards maximizing just compensation for our clients through diligent advocacy thereby ensuring that justice prevails; specifically tailored around your specific circumstances, requirements and aspirations.

At Carlson Bier, we are also aware how every case adopts its unique trajectory influenced by multiple factors such as social-economic dynamics or specifics about accident context – making it imperative to construct individualized strategies pivoting upon intricacies embedded in each claim’s reality.

Grasping broad terminologies pertaining to classifying spinal cord injuries can significantly influence the development aspects tied up with your legal rights:

• Complete Spinal Cord Injuries: Complete spinal cord injuries involve total functional loss below the injury site with no sensation or voluntary movement possible. Compensation claims in such cases usually demand considerable understanding of both intricate medical realities as well as challenging legal dimensions.

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: An incomplete spinal cord injury signifies partial preservation of functions below the injury level leading towards varied degrees of mobility along with a significantly complex prognosis that varies from person to person.

Treading through these testing times calls for professional legal support imbibed with compassion, tenacity and profound knowledge matching the complexities tied up within spinal cord injury landscape – attributes which Carlson Bier assures consistently.

Obligations rooted in Illinois law keeps us anchored around our physical office space but simultaneously frees us to extend superior service quality beyond geographical constraints dispensing invaluable assistance across different suburbs benefitting numerous individuals affected by the distressing consequences related to spinal cord injuries.

Thus, we generously invite you on this enlightening journey powered by Carlson Bier’s blend of convoluted expertise tempered gently with humanistic care targeted towards providing absolute confidence about your rights being effectively safeguarded within this challenging yet extremely critical arena hosted by personal injury law playfield.

As an empowered individual equipped with comprehensive knowledge surrounding aspects influencing spinal cord injuries; dare yourself to assess actual worth behind your distinct case- just click below & let us navigate this immensely vital journey that can potentially reshape life under new light allowing hope’s solidification against adversity’s turbulent backdrop. Together, we will conquer unknown territories inching steadily closer towards securing rightful compensation perks transpiring into immense relief amid stormy scenarios dominated by overwhelming odds.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fox River Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Fox River Grove

Areas of Practice in Fox River Grove

Bicycle Collisions

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending specialist legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Extending professional legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Fall Incidents

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents get reasonable settlement for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Crash

Extending experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in offering specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer