...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Galesburg

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the intricate aftermath of bicycle accidents, the legal guidance of Carlson Bier Attorneys ensures you are in capable hands. With extensive experience dealing specifically with these unique cases, we uphold the rights and interests of bicyclists affected by traffic-related incidents within Galesburg area and beyond. We specialize in deciphering complex injury laws, guiding clients through insurance claims processes to secure fair compensation for medical expenses, emotional distress or lost wages due to cycling mishaps. Operating from Illinois, this firm’s understanding of local state regulations assists numerous clients navigate their personal injury case proficiently. Our track record speaks volumes about our astute dedication to each client’s needs and commitment towards delivering optimum outcomes no matter how complicated a scenario may seem. If you’re seeking an expert Bicycle Accidents lawyer who can effectively advocate on your behalf while ensuring compliance with all requisite Illinois legislation – choose Carlson Bier – where every case is treated with absolute meticulousness and dedicated professionalism.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Galesburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we excel in the field of personal injury law and showcase a deep-rooted commitment to advocate for the rights and wellbeing of individuals who’ve been victims of unfortunate bicycle accidents. As personal injury attorneys, our comprehensive grasp over Illinois specific laws enables us to carve out robust strategies that are conducive to achieving results. We endeavor to empower you with knowledge about bicycle accidents and your right to claim compensation.

Engaging in daily commuting or leisurely cycling should not leave anyone in constant fear of potential harm or danger. Yet, bicycle accidents pose significant risks including traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, broken bones, internal organ damage and even death. Bicycle accident cases can comprise diverse scenarios – collisions with automobiles due to driver’s negligence or poorly maintained infrastructure causing falls or bike malfunction resulting from manufacturer defects.

Interestingly, Illinois law adheres to a ‘comparative fault’ system where your contribution to the accident will proportionally reduce your entitlements. Our team ensures they help delineate the complexities associated with such regulations for better understanding.

Key points worth noting about Bicycle Accidents include:

• Bike riders must follow similar traffic laws applicable for vehicle drivers under Illinois civil codes.

• Cyclist’s level of carelessness (if any) is gauged before awarding compensations (otherwise known as ‘Comparative Fault’).

• Liability can extend not only from fellow motorists but also government entities accountable for road conditions and bike manufacturers.

• Proving negligence takes extensive investigation which includes gathering evidence from witnesses, photos/videos if available and medical reports.

Our legal practitioners from Carlson Bier commit themselves meticulously towards collecting substantial evidences and expert testimonies supportive of putting forth strong arguments at courtrooms. Moreover, we draw upon case studies from our years of experience while conveying cause relationships between careless acts leading up-to causation damages encountered by our clients- contributors majorly shaping outcomes favorably during trial procedures

Prolonged litigation process, emotion draining experiences and mounting bills could be adversarial for injury victims. At Carlson Bier, we put our best foot forward in enabling speedier recoveries both emotionally and financially for clients validated through mitigated legal proceedings. We believe that victories are not solely restricted to triumph at courts but also in the caliber of consolation our services impart by helping clients regain normalcy and sense of security back in life.

Another imperative yet often overlooked aspect is statutes of limitations- somewhat a ticking time clock ordained by Illinois law varying based upon victim’s age or nature of harm inflicted which necessitates quick actions against responsible culprits. Knowledge about such constraints can help prevent further losses besides initial damages due to bicycle accidents.

Now, what? If you have been involved in a bicycle accident under circumstances subjected to careless credence from others held accountable for your pain and suffering, it’s high time you think beyond mere medical recuperation because your rights stand infringed and demand justice!

At Carlson Bier, we strive towards turning situations around as proficiently as possible thereby ensuring justified compensations addressing all past, present and future financial crunches extending from loss of wages or employment down to affording costly therapeutic regimens.

Click on the button below this paragraph if you’re curious about the worthiness associated with your bicycle accident case. Our expert team at Carlson Bier stands ready to assist you with requisite evaluations contextualized within governing Illinois laws followed by putting out comprehensive plan whose implementation assures shielded protection under unparalleled legal representation offered. This could suffice as your first leap towards bridging gaps between justice served rightfully versus unattended woes stirring within while pursuing legal redressal options conducive for getting yourself back up again on unwavered paths paved with strength and determination translating into bright future ahead lit up gracefully post accident blues causing derailment initially!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Galesburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Galesburg

Areas of Practice in Galesburg

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing skilled legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Traumas

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents gain fair settlement for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Collision

Providing professional legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Harms

Focused on delivering compassionate legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​