FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Gardner

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When residents of Gardner, Illinois need assistance with Dog Bite Injuries, they turn to Carlson Bier for reliable legal representation. Skillfully navigating complex personal injury statutes in Illinois, our law firm employ years of experience and focused expertise to provide superior guidance. When it comes to canines; the idyllic image of loyalty and protection gets disrupted by sudden aggression leading to injuries. An incident like this requires immediate attention from a seasoned Dog Bite Injury attorney group who place your wellbeing first – that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Our team understands the emotional distress associated with such incidents and we strive relentlessly for justice on behalf of our clients. Every case is guided towards its best possible resolution considering client restitution as primary objective while also seeking preventative resolutions against future occurrences. Should you or a loved one endure a dog bite injury in Gardner City, let us unburden you legally – reach out to Carlson Bier today: advocating victims’ rights across Illinois unyieldingly with every word spoken and step taken.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Gardner Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the severity and impact of dog bite injuries. We are committed to empowering victims with legal information that pertains directly to their cases. As qualified personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our expertise extends on a wide range of situations such as these, each one marked by pain, stress and unexpected consequences.

Dog bite injuries are far from trivial matters. Such unfortunate events can lead to severe physical trauma including puncture wounds, scarring and even severe nerve damage which could potentially trigger long-lasting or permanent disabilities. Additionally, victims often face psychological repercussions like distress, anxiety or phobia toward dogs; some might need therapy or counseling sessions extending over time.

Here at Carlson Bier, it is our mission not only to represent you legally but also accompany you through this difficult journey with tailor-made professional guidance. To make sure that everyone has easy access to understandable and comprehensible content on the topic of dog bite injuries:

• The most crucial thing we encourage everyone involved in such an event is immediate medical treatment no matter how superficial the wound appears

• Keep track of your mental and emotional well-being alongside your medical state- any imminent fear or anxiety that arises post-injury should not be overlooked

• Preserve all relevant records related to treatments/medications taken for injury

• Document the event in as much detail as possible including date/location/circumstances leading up to incident.

In Illinois specifically, laws governing liability in dog bites fall under ‘strict liability’ rule which states that owners are held accountable regardless if they were previously aware of their pet’s aggressive tendencies or not. This means that victims have a strong possibility of making valid claims securing compensation without necessarily proving negligence on part of owner.

Navigating the law following a traumatizing experience isn’t straightforward; Therefore concentrating on recovery while allowing experienced legal personnel handle logistics would ensure optimal outcome.Accuracy here is indispensable – meticulous documentation aids us drafting robust lawsuits enhancing chances of winning justified compensation.

Our priority extends beyond retrieving compensation – we are dedicated to acknowledging full impact of the event on your life and lead the fight for justice through every challenge posed by insurance companies, legal loopholes or uncooperative accused parties.

So what does this mean for victims residing in Illinois grappling with dog bite injuries? It signifies that law is on their side – specifically designed to shield them from further stress while ensuring negligent parties bear responsibility equitably. Having guided countless clients dealing with traumatizing experiences, Carlson Bier provides an experienced voice during trying times.We assure you professional legal support extending as far as mapping out rehabilitation processes to help you resume everyday life sooner.

Kindly click the button below to ascertain legally how much your case could be potentially especially if paired with our expertise and resources here at Carlson Bier. Such knowledge should provide a clearer perspective on your available options during such difficult situations, highlighting that professional guidance is readily accessible. The commitment at Carlson Bier goes beyond courtrooms – it encompasses compassionate support throughout recovery journey amplifying possibility of normalcy resumption post-incident. Don’t shy away from leveraging personal injury regulations in place purely to protect citizens like yourself facing unforeseen circumstances.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gardner Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Gardner

Areas of Practice in Gardner

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering expert legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending professional legal support for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents receive equitable recompense for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Building Incidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Focused on defending persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​