FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Gardner

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the sphere of Spinal Cord Injuries law, Carlson Bier stakes a claim as an unrivaled firm providing exceptional legal assistance to victims in Gardner and across Illinois. Drawing on their deep expertise within this specific domain of personal injury law, they understand fully the complexities that underpin these significant cases. They recognize that such injuries can lead to severe disability or even life-altering circumstances; it’s more than just physical pain. Consequently, their aim extends beyond litigation—it’s about reclaiming your quality of life and securing monetary compensation reflective of your distress. With Carlson Bier at the helm of your case, you will have advocates who combine skilful negotiation with assertive representation – all tailored to fight for optimal outcomes for each client impacted by Spinal Cord Injury. When considering who should represent you during these difficult times, think direct experience coupled with demonstrated results—think Carlson Bier—a group ready to serve Gardner residents’ legal needs professionally and diligently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Gardner Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, we possess a team of personal injury lawyers armed with a wealth of experience and knowledge about Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). Our expert attorneys understand that these injuries can drastically alter your life in an instant, robbing you of your daily functions like mobility or sensory abilities. Navigating the complex meshwork of legal hurdles post-injury can be overwhelming, so allow us to provide you with some crucial information on this topic.

SCI signify any damage to the spinal cord that is attributable, but not limited to traumatic factors such as accidents or falls. It becomes pivotal to grasp how these injuries operate in order to effectively pursue lawful compensations. Primarily, they disrupt the communication line between the brain and parts of your body below the point of injury. This leads to dire consequences including weakness or paralysis, decreased function in respiratory and cardiovascular systems, altered sensation, pain syndromes among others.

Understanding where exactly on the spinal column these injuries transpired can assist significantly in comprehending their possible implications:

* Cervical part – The damage in this upper end region commonly results in tetraplegia which impairs both arms and legs.

* Thoracic section – Injuries here mostly lead to paraplegia affecting lower limbs.

* Lumbar/Sacral fraction – Harm at this bottom area generally causes some loss of function in hips and legs.

Armed with this cognizance now let’s explore various legal aspects encompassing SCIs. Personal injury laws permit compensation claims for losses suffered due to another’s negligence causing SCI’s. These could include damages for:

* Medical expenses related directly from hospitalization following initial trauma up until future treatment requirements;

* Losses incurred due to diminished work capacity or actual loss wages;

* Personal loss such as pain & suffering endured by victim;

* Other miscellaneous costs involved during rehabilitation process e.g., equipment purchases

Remember every case has its own distinct facets, and thus the exact specifics vary based upon individual circumstances. It’s key, therefore, to consult with experienced attorneys – like us at Carlson Bier- who can guide you through this convoluted legal maze by meticulously analyzing every minute detail of your case.

A paramount point to note is the statute of limitations that essentially sets a time limit for filing a lawsuit in SCI cases. In Illinois, an injured person has two years from the date of injury to file such a suit under Personal Injury Law or four years under Property Damage Law. The clock’s ticking, so delay no further!

We understand how daunting it may feel navigating around these huge medical terminologies and complex legislations after experiencing such grave injuries. You already have enough on your plate with dealing post-trauma life adjustments; let us unburden you from these legal complexities! At Carlson Bier we comprehend not just the law but also recognize critical medical aspects encompassing spinal cord injuries enabling us provide personalized legal services based on your unique needs.

While it seems exceedingly challenging right now battling these tribulations caused due to SCI’s don’t lose sight amidst this chaos; remember rights protected under law exist for you too ensuring provision of rightful compensation. Our commitment as your personal injury lawyers extends beyond mere representation – it’s about working relentlessly till justice is served advocating fiercely for what’s rightfully owed to you.

If all these facts have given rise to questions – reach out! We’re ever ready–and eager–to offer guidance and advice tailored precisely according to myriad layers of your situation.

Intriguing isn’t it? How much might be the value tethered with YOUR case? Well make no further guesses as our knowledgeable team stands prepared providing quick yet comprehensive case evaluations. Click on the button below now and embark towards claiming what’s rightfully yours today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gardner Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Gardner

Areas of Practice in Gardner

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying skilled legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Incidents

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Incidents: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents get reasonable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring adept legal support for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to extending specialized legal services for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in advocating for individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​