...

Bicycle Accidents in Georgetown

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be challenging and distressing. As victims navigate their legal rights, having proficient representation is crucial for securing fair compensation. Carlson Bier, highly regarded in Illinois for unswerving dedication to personal injury claims, stands out specifically when it comes to bicycle accidents. Our experienced attorneys have extensive knowledge of traffic laws and regulations pertinent to cyclists’ safety keeping your best interest as our utmost priority.

Our resourcefulness amplifies our ability in maneuvering through complex bicycle accident cases effectively resulting in favorable outcomes for our clients time after time across Georgetown. With Carlson Bier’s formidable expertise on your side, you will receive the comprehensive legal support essential during these taxing times.

We understand that every circumstance differs thus we tailor unique strategies catering specifically to each case’s individual detains fueled by professional commitment towards achieving justice for those unjustly injured whilst cycling. By choosing Carlson Bier, rest assured you are entrusting precious hands whose experience and resilience define us as a first-class choice amongst bike riders seeking exceptional lawyers handling Bicycle Accidents related cases.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Georgetown Illinois

When it comes to bicycling accidents, the landscape of law and safety in Illinois can be treacherous territory. That’s where our team at Carlson Bier steps in as your trusted advocate. As seasoned personal injury attorneys, our expertise encompasses an array of accident-related circumstances, specifically those involving cyclists. We understand the importance and impact this information has on you – the reader – empowering you to navigate these legal complexities with ease and confidence.

Bicycling accidents present a distinct set of issues compared to other vehicle incidents; often resulting in significant injuries owing to the lack of physical protection provided by a bicycle. The unfortunate fact is that per mile traveled, cyclist fatality rates are up to eight times higher than those for car occupants according to national data. At Carlson Bier, we’re committed to providing comprehensive knowledge about these sinister scenarios that occur far too frequently – equipping you with vital insights into how they unfold and importantly, how liability is established.

• Making sense of traffic laws: Cyclist rights within Illinois traffic laws are nuanced but knowable; when cycling on public highways or roadways, cyclists have essentially the same obligations -and equivalent rights- as motor vehicles.

• Understanding shared fault: If a cyclist contributed partly to their own injuries (for example failing to wear a helmet), he or she may still recover compensation under comparative negligence rules applying in Illinois state.

• Anticipating Insurer resistance: Insurance companies will commonly try disputing claims surrounding bicycling accidents due to widely held misperceptions around cyclists & them ‘assuming risk’’ of riding bicycles amongst heavy motorized traffic.

As experienced legal advisors from Carlson Bier, we work meticulously through each individual case’s unique dimensions aiding effective resolution and rightful compensation.

If your incident involved improper road conditions such as deficient maintenance or design failures like indiscernible signage or blind spots leading toward culprit intersections etc., claims might evolve against entities responsible for preserving safe infrastructure including city or county governments.

Being aware of the ‘statute of limitations’ is absolutely crucial too. Under Illinois laws, an injured bicyclist typically has two years from the incident’s date to file a personal injury lawsuit in court against potential defendants.

What may unfold following bicycling accidents can be daunting. Negotiating intensely with insurance adjusters, mounting medical bills, wage loss due to missed work days; all these add immense stress both physically and emotionally. This is why partnering with Carlson Bier’s specialized lawyers can make all the difference for you. We firmly negotiate liability claims on your behalf while concurrently ensuring that maximum possible recovery amounts are secured for the injuries suffered.

Bicycle accident litigation can weave complex trajectories implicating not only motor vehicle statutes but also municipal ordinances relating to cyclo-infrastructure obligations etc. As your trusted legal partner, our focus lies in relentlessly pursuing every available resource, every legal avenue, providing representation steeped in sound knowledge and unquestionable commitment towards optimal outcomes for you – our client.

Accidents are unplanned indeed; their repercussions unwanted and largely overwhelming – more so when they involve bicycles considering the heightened risk factors involved. What needs remembering though is this – Legal pathways exist which ensure rightful claimants don’t bear unmerited burdens resulting from such incidents.

Now comes the time for action! We cordially invite you to take advantage of our skilled team at Carlson Bier – offering proficient expertise centered around personal injury cases precisely such as yours involving cycling mishaps anywhere within Illinois state lines (and let’s remember: “anywhere” means any place we hold physical office space). All it takes is a single tap on that button lying just below this screen. Discover how much value we can bring into your life by helping determine what your case could truly be worth. Informed decisions lead to powerful results & together we will road-map a way forward from here!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Georgetown Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Georgetown

Areas of Practice in Georgetown

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying adept legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Tumble Injuries

Skilled in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents obtain just recompense for hurts and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Semi Accident

Extending adept legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Building Crashes

Committed to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to providing expert legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Expert in representing patients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer