...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Georgetown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing medical malpractice can be an arduous journey filled with layers of intricacy and intense emotions. Therefore, it’s crucial to have reliable guidance from those with intimate legal knowledge in the matter. This is where Carlson Bier steps in; our dedicated team of personal injury lawyers specializing in Medical Malpractice law stands poised to protect your rights and interests tirelessly. Serving the people within Georgetown vicinity, we focus on building resilient cases equipped with tenacious research and personalized strategy ensuring maximum compensation for damages incurred through negligent healthcare practices. Our reputation rides upon our exceptional professional expertise, integrity-driven approach, client-centered service – all built over decades by successfully handling complex Medical Malpractice cases just like yours! Despite the formidable challenges posed by such lawsuits, clients find reassurance knowing they are in capable hands at Carlson Bier. With us advocating for you, justice becomes not only achievable but also accessible as we guide you step-by-step towards a favorable resolution.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Georgetown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of trusted personal injury attorneys specializing in Medical Malpractice cases based within the jurisdiction of Illinois. We understand that medical malpractice can be an overwhelming experience – potentially devastating to both your health and financial well-being. It is crucial to have knowledgeable advocates on your side who can guide you adeptly through the complex world of medical negligence law.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider – be it an individual or an institution – strays from recognized “standards of care” in the treatment process resulting in harm or injury to the patient. These standards refer to what any reasonably prudent medical practitioner would, or wouldn’t do under similar circumstances. This deviation could be due to errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare measures, or oversight during health management.

There are several common types of medical malpractice claims:

• Failure to diagnose

• Improper treatment

• Failure to warn a patient of known risks

In these situations, proving negligence is key and at Carlson Bier we have a proven track record for successfully doing so by demonstrating that:

– There was an officially established relationship between doctor-patient.

– The physician was negligent in providing medical care or failed to meet standard regulations.

– Direct causation where this negligence led directly to the patient’s harm or injury.

– That real demonstrable damage has occurred whether physical, mental anguish or financially crippling medical expenses.

Our dedicated team will ensure each step towards justice is taken methodically with all possibly traumatizing implications considered sensitively yet systematically. In fact, it’s part of our ethos: ‘Access To Justice For All Victims Of Negligence’.

Illinois’ strict implementation of statute limitations means filing lawsuits must take place within two years from when the victim became aware (or should have become aware) of their injury inflicted due to medical malpractice; with overall restrictions placed up-to-four-years post alleged act(s) of negligence. These regulations serve to expedite cases, promoting efficiency in the justice system while reducing potential abuse of the litigation process.

Here at Carlson Bier, we offer comprehensive case evaluations ensuring every aspect of your predicament is meticulously scrutinized to tailor personalized solutions. We are prepared to champion you throughout this intimidating process; arming ourselves with thorough investigations and expert testimonies that corroborate your claim under Illinois law culminating into solid arguments in court or towards substantial settlements during negotiation proceedings.

We understand how mounting medical bills and loss of earnings further complicate matters for you which is why we operate on contingency – no fees are charged unless we win. This ensures we devote our utmost time, resources and unwavering determination into each unique case until justice is served.

As recognized thought-leaders within the field, Carlson Bier also dedicates significant attention towards educating clients regarding medical malpractice laws in Illinois by elaborating its complexities through easy-to-understand language. By doing so, we empower clients with knowledge essential to making informed decisions towards seeking rightful compensation guided by unrivalled professionals who empathetically prioritize their best interest.

Clinching victory requires more than just laudable representation though: effective communication forms a key component keeping clients updated with progress notches so they too can trust in the journey as much as the outcome.

Scroll below knowing that behind this ‘click’ lies an opportunity to benefit from our esteemed expertise without any initial financial burden. Allow us at Carlson Bier provide commendable aid essential to wrestling victory from those validly owing you recompense for their acts of medical malpractice negligence under, robustly enforced, Illinois law. Uncover what your case could be potentially worth – click now because at Carlson Bier ‘We Fight For You’.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Georgetown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Georgetown

Areas of Practice in Georgetown

Cycling Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing adept legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering professional legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents get equitable payout for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Offering professional legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in defending clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​