...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Georgetown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-altering impacts of spinal cord injuries. With a reputation for aggressive representation and an unwavering commitment to secure justice for our clients, our dedicated team is poised to provide unmatched legal assistance in cases involving traumatic spinal cord injuries. Our expertise extends across various areas – from understanding medical complexities that surround such delicate matters to effectively maneuvering through intricate legal environments. As your advocates, you can trust Carlson Bier’s proficiency in demanding accountability and obtaining you maximum compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering or more. Carrying years of successful experience under their belts while upholding the highest standard of ethics vigourously defined by Illinois law; Carlson Bier remains cognizant throughout every twist and turn of your journey towards recovery. Trust us with representing your interests amidst challenging times – reach out today! When it comes to safeguarding victim rights after devastating spinal cord injuries; choose bold advocacy…choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Georgetown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our solid footing in personal injury law finds its roots in the keen understanding and comprehensive approach we take regarding spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries are a significant component of personal injury cases as they can lead to chronic disability, drastically altering an individual’s quality of life. As such, we diligently take the necessary measures towards ensuring that victims of these heartbreaking incidents attain justice effectively.

The spinal cord is undoubtedly one of the most critical and delicate components of the body. It plays a pivotal role in carrying out crucial bodily functions. Specifically, it connects with messenger nerves spread across every part of the body, which relay information between your brain and vital organs, muscles, and tissues. When this connection suffers disruption due to injury or illness, it can lead to substantial long-term repercussions.

• Paralysis: This wound is deemed one of the gravest outcomes triggered by severe impairment to the spinal cord. A victim might become fully paralyzed (quadriplegic) or partially so (paraplegic), depending on how severely their spinal cord was injured.

• Severe Pain: Chronic nerve pain resulting from damaged nerves post-injury often has detrimental effects on an individual’s ability for daily functioning.

• Loss Of Sensation: The loss of touch sensitivity is a leading challenge some patients may experience following spinal damage.

At Carlson Bier law firm’s core lies empathy — we understand that grappling with a devastating spinal cord injury implies more than just physical suffering; emotional anguish inevitably permeates too. We aim to lighten this ordeal by offering our utmost commitment and expertise towards legal redress for clients facing such traumatic circumstances.

Our proficient attorneys are trained impeccably and equipped with years worth knowledge about tort law intricacies involved in personal injury cases relating specifically to spinal trauma injuries – all tailored exclusively towards Illinois’ statutes governing personal injury claims so that you receive legal support moulded precisely per your situation requirements!

To further enrich your understanding, consider these relevant Illinois spinal cord injury laws and facts:

• Statute Of Limitations: Victims must file their lawsuit within a specified time frame, typically two years from the date of the accident.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: If a victim is partially at fault for their injury, this may reduce the compensation they can recover proportionately to their percentage of blame.

• Damage Caps: Certain restrictions on compensatory remuneration apply, specific to each case type.

Navigating all the intricacies involved in filing a claim and obtaining rightful compensation becomes notably more manageable when walking alongside Carlson Bier’s seasoned team of lawyers. Why not ensure you’re in capable hands that respect your sensitivity while still fostering an enduring fight against injustice?

Although every personal injury circumstance varies significantly depending largely upon the individual fact-situation at hand; our attorneys focus acutely on untangling complex legislative webs surrounding such delicate claims – we use our expansive knowledge towards constructing compelling legal narratives that robustly advocate for your rights as victims.

To effectively facilitate potential clients across Illinois, we maintain physical offices where you can consult with us confidently regarding your case specifics. Furthermore, rest assured knowing that we strictly comply with all advertising laws mandated by Illinois State. While might not be physically present in every city or town across Illinois state as a law firm – we remain only one call away- ready and willing to leap into action wherever justice needs application!

Perhaps now finds you considering next steps on your journey toward recovery? Take heart knowing this – it’s crucial never underestimating worth of professional guidance during these devastating times. We cannot reverse what happened; however, together –hand-in-hand–we catalyze positive change beneficial towards redefining tomorrow’s narrative more favorably.

As Carlson Bier, let us join forces to unleash fitting recourse for those responsible and unlock rightful reparations owed! In need of targeted counsel regarding potential claim value? Allow us in making that step easier by clicking the button below. Explore how much could your case be worth now? Your journey to justice begins with one simple click.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Georgetown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Georgetown

Areas of Practice in Georgetown

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving adept legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Fall Incidents

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents secure just compensation for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring expert legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on providing compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​