FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Granville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, securing robust legal representation is crucial. Carlson Bier are renowned specialists in this field throughout Illinois, their wealth of experience makes them leaders amongst personal injury attorney firms. They are dedicated to defend the rights of pedestrians who have been injured due to another’s negligence or recklessness and pursue justice on their behalf with relentless determination and professional expertise. Throughout these stressful situations, their thoughtful approach puts clients at ease whilst they meticulously build a solid case that aims at gaining worthwhile compensation for sustained injuries and any other losses incurred during such accidents. With a proven track record handling pedestrian accident cases across multiple jurisdictions including Granville area, they demonstrate an impressive eye for detail while providing outstanding client service. The attorneys at Carlson Bier will exude nothing but confidence in your corner because not only do they understand the law – they know how to make it work for you when you need it most; assuring peace of mind through diligent delivery promises unmatched reliability during your pedestrian accident legal needs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Granville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to your welfare and the pursuit of justice in cases pertaining to personal injuries. One such focal area is pedestrian accidents, a distressing occurrence that often has grave consequences. As a premier Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury lawsuits, it’s our mission to provide an enlightening guide on a high-risk concern – pedestrian accidents.

Such incidents can happen anytime and anywhere – from bustling city crosswalks to seemingly safe suburban sidewalks. Research indicates several contributing factors: speeding drivers, distracted or impaired driving, disregard for traffic rules or signals, weather conditions and inadequate pedestrian facilities among others. Pedestrian victims tend to suffer severe injuries due to unprotected exposure at the time of the collision. Commonly reported injuries include broken bones, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain damage and even fatal outcomes in extreme cases.

Any victim involved in this unfortunate scenario has legal rights under Illinois law which deserves comprehensive understanding:

• Pedestrians hold right-of-way at all controlled intersections and designated walkways.

• Drivers are mandated by law to stop for pedestrians within a school zone or near a school-related crosswalk.

• Pedestrians carrying visible white canes (with or without red tips) or guide dogs must be given unchecked right-of-way.

However, it’s important to note that pedestrians also have certain prescribed responsibilities like adhering to traffic control devices and using established pathways wherever possible.

Dealing with personal injuries post-accident is stressful enough without adding intricate legal processes into the mix. Establishing liability involves complexities under shared fault laws where both driver negligence and pedestrian negligence may intersect varying degrees. That’s where experts like us step into the picture as trusted allies who can seamlessly navigate through these complexities.

Carlson Bier offers personalized solutions addressing specific needs pertinent to each case while upholding utmost professional integrity. Our experienced attorneys work tirelessly towards achieving maximum compensation for incurred losses such as medical expenses; pain & suffering; loss of wages or future income, among others.

Despite robust support and proper legal aid, confronting a personal injury incident like this one can incite various concerns. But let’s put those worries to bed:

• “Will I have to pay if the case doesn’t win?” – We operate mainly on a contingency fee basis which means we don’t get paid unless you do too.

• “Who is at fault for the accident?” – Determining the blame isn’t always straightforward in pedestrian accidents. Our dedicated team analyzes every detail surrounding your case to identify potential negligence.

• “How long does it take?” – While there aren’t specific timelines due to unique circumstances per case, our attorneys prioritize resolution without needless delay.

Navigating the aftermath of an accident is tricky terrain filled with obstacles that permeate beyond immediate physical injuries. The emotional turmoil and financial hardship accompanying these unfortunate incidents often go unaddressed. It’s here where Carlson Bier steps up as more than just a law firm, but as caretakers equipped with profound empathic understanding molded by years of experience.

Accidents can be disorienting; they jolt you out of normalcy, leaving you on shaky ground. In times like these having expert assistance becomes a necessity rather than privilege. Empowering you through insightful knowledge about pedestrian accidents and their subsequent legal bearings strengthens our pledge towards impeccable service.

At Carlson Bier, each story matters profoundly; yours holds that same significance too! Let us help piece back together that disrupted harmony inflicted by misfortune while pursuing justice earnestly on your behalf. Now conveniently assess your situation’s merit by exploring what your case might be worth financially – ensuring no stone goes unturned in ensuring optimal compensation for your suffering.

Leave uncertainties behind and look towards reclaiming integral parts lost post-accident with us at Carlson Bier — committed tirelessly to extenuating distress amidst crisis situations! For further assistance, feel free to click on the button below. Unfurl how much value your case truly holds with us. Commitment is promised for we are all about seeking justice and restoring balance in our clients’ lives.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Granville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Granville

Areas of Practice in Granville

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending skilled legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Delivering experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Fall Accidents

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Incident

Extending expert legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for hurts.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in delivering professional legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in representing persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​