FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Grayville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, it’s imperative to enlist a legal expert capable of securing your rights and ensuring restitution. In Illinois, no firm is more apt for this task than Carlson Bier. As established personal injury lawyers, we’ve built our reputation on accountability and expertise; assets that echo through our association with pedestrian-related mishaps throughout Grayville. Possessing an extensive grasp of local law regulations and insight into traffic patterns across town intersections—our attorneys are skilled at handling complex tasks associated with such cases. While navigating medical bills or seeking compensation due to unanticipated wage loss might seem daunting—we have transformed these struggles into recoveries for scores of victims in Grayville, leveraging our deep understanding of state-specific laws surrounding pedestrian safety. The thoughtfulness applied to every case shows why Carlson Bier stands as the first choice when selecting a Pedestrian Accident lawyer—an ally committed not merely to proving fault but restoring justice in your life post-accident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Grayville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing skilled legal representation for victims of pedestrian accidents. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we understand how these unnerving incidents can turn your life upside down and affect both your health and finances considerably.

Pedestrian accidents are incidents where an individual is struck by a vehicle while on foot. Whether you’re crossing the street, walking along the road, or simply waiting at a crosswalk, these unfortunate events can happen anytime due to various reasons such as distracted driving, speeding or even failure to obey traffic laws. Regardless of cause, it’s essential to remember that you have legal rights if you’ve been involved in such an accident.

•Time frame for filing a lawsuit: The state law affords you the right to file a claim within two years after the date of the accident.

• Determining liability: Liability will be determined based on whether negligence was involved like reckless driving or impairment due to intoxication.

• Compensation scope: You may be eligible for compensation which cover medical expenses including hospital bills and ongoing treatment costs; loss earnings due to incapacity to work; intangible losses like emotional distress etc.

These factors underline why it’s critical to consult with us immediately after seeking necessary medical attention post-accident. Our experience imparts us with shrewd strategies honed over time that ensure each client gets justly compensated for damages and afflictions endured because of someone else’s negligence.

It’s important our potential clients understand that pedestrian accidents don’t only involve cars – they include bicycles and motorcycles too. However diverse or complex situations might appear; rest assured Carlson Bier has seasoned experts who’ve successfully handled an array of cases related explicitly to pedestrian accidents amidst vehicles.

If immediate action isn’t taken following an incident disrupting their lives severely many people end up losing out on rightful benefits they could’ve received otherwise therefor swift contact with an attorney post-accident becomes vital then delay it.

The legal landscape of pedestrian accidents is fraught with complexities, and as your attorneys, we are committed to navigating through these for you. By employing deft negotiation skills and in-depth knowledge of personal injury laws, our team ensures your rights are never compromised.

In the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, it’s only natural feeling overwhelmed what with all those hospital bills compounded by absenteeism work hence financial instability looming over sentence however Hudson Bier makes this unpleasant journey bearable for clients guaranteeing judicious guidance during such testing times striving obtain justice on their behalf each step along way

As devoted advocates for injured pedestrians across Illinois state we leverage deep expertise coupled firm’s resources shield victims from hardships they might face pursuing claims against at-fault parties let us shoulder burden while focus recovery well-being knowing have trusted representative standing up your right seeking compensation due.

Bolstered by countless victorious negotiations monstrous insurance companies that usually attempt undervalue or outright deny just compensation Carlson Bier possesses requisite tenacity continually challenge these entities ensure client gets nothing short fair deserving amount after enduring undeserved trauma inflicted them due negligence other party

All aspects important remember small detail case carries value when pursuing claim hence comprehensive approach towards dissecting every potential aspect paramount even seemingly minuscule incident could turn tide favor our watchful eye leaves no stone unturned accessing rightful dues anyone subjected such distressing events their lives changes they bring forth inevitably

We encourage further exploration regarding how much claim could be worth. Truth being told difficulty lies assessing exact worth until professional shares insights nuances linked involved process requires complex calculations actual incurred expenses future costs loss income decreased earning capacity quality life psychological impact – among others – culminate into final amount deserve comprehends intricacies completely committing bringing maximum possible relief form just settlement Click button below now explore worth terms tangible compensation sustained injuries result negligent behavior.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Grayville

Areas of Practice in Grayville

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing adept legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing expert legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Mishaps

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents receive equitable payout for injuries and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Incident

Extending professional legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Focused on ensuring professional legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on assisting patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​