Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Greenfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you face the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, the representation and legal support provided by Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Acknowledging that navigating complex legal terrain is burdensome for victims, our expert team aims to simplify this process by shouldering your litigation concerns. Every attorney in our firm understands accidents on this scale; we focus entirely on personal injury law, giving us an unrivaled depth of knowledge in this space. Carlson Bier consistently delivers superior performances across Illinois with a particular knack for handling pedestrian accident cases in Greenfield exceptionally well. We become each client’s partners during their journey towards justice, offering compassionate support coupled with aggressive courtroom tactics when necessary. Committed to reclaiming compensation fitting for your experience and suffering from defendant parties or insurance companies—we ensure no stone is left unturned regarding your justice claim. If you need robust representation after a pedestrian accident, there are many compelling reasons why making Carlson Bier part of that crucial decision might be your best step forward.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Greenfield Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois pioneering representation for victims of pedestrian accidents. At our offices, we understand that no amount of monetary recompense can fairly equate with the physical and emotional trauma suffered following a pedestrian accident. All the same, we tirelessly advocate for fair compensation on behalf of clients in light of their unfortunate predicaments.

Pedestrian accidents occur when an individual walking is injured by a vehicle or cyclist; scenarios which are becoming increasingly frequent due to greater automobile proliferation on streets and motorist negligence. Perhaps you have fallen victim to such a calamity or acting on behalf of a family member? Our legal experts will cogently express your concerns while seeking appropriate legal redress aligned to Illinois State laws governing traffic casualties.

Key facts worth noting when it comes to pedestrian accidents include:

– The at-fault party can either be the pedestrian who acted negligently causing an accident or the vehicle driver who failed routine observation and committed dangerous actions.

– Liability is established when one party’s negligent behavior endangers another leading to undesirable consequences.

– Pedestrians possess equivalent rights as motorists regarding road usage—vehicles should yield appropriately where needed.

The gravity behind adhering to guidelines lies within statutory legalese embodying pedestrian-safety provisions. Violating these norms invariably brings about unwarranted mishaps contributing towards serious injury if not fatality.

At Carlson Bier, our modus operandi entails getting fully acquainted with your situation before embarking on building persuasive claims cognizant of Illinois Law principles. Substantial experience handling various unique cases places us in an enviable position primed for championing your legal battle while ensuring obligatory parties fulfill their compensatory roles.

Expect comprehensive assistance throughout case evaluation extending till conclusive resolution working alongside us. Deliverables offered encapsulate proper evidence documentation critical towards reinforcing liability proof aiming for maximum compensation guarantee within lawful parameters: out-of-pocket expenses reimbursement resulting from injuries sustained, wage loss coverage during recuperation, as well as compensation for long-term hardships endured.

Exercising due diligence in all case facts ensures no damning evidence is overlooked. Our proactive injury lawyers strive to safeguard your rights while warding off any underhanded tactics employed insurance firms bent on circumventing justice.

Stage a formidable fight back with Carlson Bier against the adversity faced following pedestrian accidents. Equipped with unmatched capability handling personal injury lawsuits coupled with unrelenting pursuit of reparation, our stalwart team is undoubtedly your go-to legal representation within Illinois environs. Let us be the beacon guiding you through life’s stormy sea steering your cause towards deserved victory.

We pride ourselves on ensuring proper dissemination of relevant information facilitating client understanding on each legal action undertaken. This exemplary service ensures that you are not left alone floundering in confusing jargon but properly equipped to handle media and other violator-defendants with confidence and most crucially, dignity intact.

Strive to protect yourself by allying with proven expertise proven in turning around pedestrian accident lawsuit outcomes favorably. Immediately after an incident—contact us for guided direction pending full recovery and possible filing of a personal injury lawsuit if need be.

In summary, choosing Carlson Bier means choosing skilled advocacy committed towards restoring normalcy and obtaining fair redress for your predicament post pedestrian accidents. Rest assured; we carry your burdens empathetically assuring heartfelt condolences coupled alongside renewed fervor channeled at serving justice proportionately.

Driven by deeply rooted commitment informed by years of valuable experience dealing with personal injuries related claims—we guarantee purposeful strides towards amicably resolving litigious dispute before lengthy court processes become necessary – a testament to our untiring dedication advocating victim rights well-being.

Don’t wait until it’s too late, allow us to help determine the worthiness of your potential claim aligned to Illinois Law stipulations thereby surmounting possible disparities potentially derailing justice expediently met.

Your peace of mind starts here; click the button below. Understandably, it’s not about magic calculations but decisive actions taken promptly directly affecting claim outcome desirability. Let us help you determine how much your case is worth today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Greenfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Greenfield

Areas of Practice in Greenfield

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying skilled legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Fall Occurrences

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Damages

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents secure equitable compensation for injuries and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in providing professional legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer