...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Greenup

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can cause significant physiological and emotional turmoil, altering the course of your life dramatically. It’s in such turbulent times that legal expertise is not just an option but a necessity. Carlson Bier attorney team is unmatched when it comes to advocating for victims of spinal cord injuries. Our firm has secured justice for countless clients, delivering results fueled by our dedication to truth and fairness.

What sets us apart? Expertise built upon years of successful legal practice, comprehensive understanding of Illinois law surrounding spinal cord injuries, coupled with compassion towards our clients’ situations makes the deft navigation through these complex claims a task we are equipped to conquer.

Choosing Carlson Bier means personalized attention – you are not simply another case; you’re part of our mission where your welfare is paramount. We relentlessly fight on your behalf while ensuring that no stone goes unturned in pursuit of securing optimum compensation for your distress.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t just work cases – we empower lives disrupted by devastating incidents like spinal cord injuries back onto their rightful paths – giving hope where despair lurks.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Greenup Illinois

Welcome to the website of Carlson Bier, a steadfast personal injury lawyer group known for providing diligent representation to residents throughout Illinois. Our team holds extensive experience in dealing with cases related to Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs), comprehending the immense aftermath such damages can wreak on your well-being, work capability and overall lifestyle.

Let’s delve into discussing SCIs in-depth.Yes, it is essential knowledge for everyone because sudden injuries and accidents are an unforeseen reality of our lives. A spinal cord injury might occur due to various reasons ranging from automobile accidents, high-impact sports injuries, damaging falls or acts of violence leading to either complete or incomplete spinal cord damage.

• Complete SCI results in loss of all sensory function and control below the level of injury.

• Incomplete SCI implies that there is some functioning remaining beneath the principal level of injury.

Post-injury period is challenging and daunting; teeming with physical discomfort heightened by financial woes due to medical expenses and potentially reduced earning capacity. Thus, joining hands with an experienced attorney can be instrumental in reclaiming your stability.

To further empower you in this journey, we at Carlson Bier are committed not just towards offering top-drawer legal services but also enlightening clients about their rights after sustaining spinal cord injuries.

Rest assured knowing that we vehemently adhere to ethical practices including respecting every state law – one reason why our foothold as a trusted law firm remains unshakable across various parts of Illinois excluding Greenup.

Now let’s glean over some pivotal points detailing how an adept attorney’s assistance could help mitigate the adverse impacts following SCI –

• Determine liability: Establishing who bears responsibility often takes detailed investigation which is deftly executed by skilled attorneys.

• Understand insurance policies: Insurance policies may hide dense jargon and complex terms beyond general comprehension; having an attorney simplifies understanding its implications.

• Evaluate damages: Experienced attorneys accurately account for past and future income lost, emotional distress and the complete array of repercussions a spinal cord injury hurls.

At Carlson Bier, we pledge to extend our seasoned expertise in navigating the legal landscape following Spinal Cord Injuries. It is through aligning relentless pursuit with empathetic handling of each case that we have been instrumental in numerous clients securing due compensation helping ameliorate their hardships.

As you make strides on this expedition from injury toward recovery, it’s essential to remember – you are not alone. Embrace the assurance that a dependable personal injury attorney is keen on taking over your litigation stress allowing you concentrate purely on healing.

We hope you found value in acquiring knowledge about Spinal Cord Injuries and how retaining an adroit personal lawyer can ease your ordeal. This tryst between empowerment via education and impassioned representation formulates the embodiment of Carlson Bier’s outreach strategy.

Legal cases related to SCI routinely require specialized expertise owing to their significant impact across medical bills, pain, loss of lifestyle joy among more often enduring aspect resulting even years after initial incident; hence possessing accurate information regarding its nuances could potentially aid in casting light during challenging times.

Should you or a loved one come face-to-face with such adversity caused by another party’s recklessness or neglect entailing a spinal cord injury, do not hesitate to seek help from industry insiders who hold proficiency for just these circumstances – like us at Carlson Bier.

Having armed yourself with understanding Spin Cord Injuries better now combined with knowing how an adequate attorney might prove beneficial let your subsequent step unleash power towards initiating tangible action right away! Why not feed your curiosity further? Click the button below and find out what worth does your potential case holds today! Take back control without any delay! It’s time for restful sleep while entrusting worry-load onto strong shoulders of Carlson Bier experts ensuring utmost outstanding professional legal guidance at every stage.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Greenup Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Greenup

Areas of Practice in Greenup

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving professional legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Providing experienced legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Slip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents obtain just remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Providing expert legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in assisting individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer