...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hamilton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be distressing and painful, but seeking legal recourse with the support of Carlson Bier brings relief in Hamilton. Our firm diligently champions the rights of victims, ensuring comprehensive representation for Dog Bite Injuries. As personal injury lawyers specializing in this unique field, our knowledge is extensive and our track record is commendable. We thoroughly understand Illinois’ intricacies regarding dog bite laws which sets us apart as advocates who ensure that your case receives due justice combined with maximum compensation recovery. At Carlson Bier, we believe each client deserves personalized attention and empathy to alleviate part of their traumatic ordeal while meticulously navigating them through the complexities of the system to achieve deserved results — focusing on both physical healing and sufficient financial restitution to cover medical costs or lost wages if applicable. Choose Carlson Bier as your companion on your road towards legal relief; opt for an experienced hand that values your recovery post dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hamilton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we vigorously champion the rights of victims dealing with injuries resulting from a dog bite incident. Based in the state of Illinois, our seasoned personal injury attorneys understand your suffering and are ready to work tirelessly towards securing you the justice you deserve.

Dog bites can result in severe physical harm including lacerations, puncture wounds, nerve damage, scarring, or even infections such as rabies and tetanus. It is crucial to comprehend that these injuries might go beyond physical pain to cause emotional trauma and financial strains due to mounting medical bills.

Key factors surrounding dog bite injuries include:

– The Dog Owner’s Liability: In Illinois, under “strict liability” law for animal attacks means owners cannot escape responsibility if their pets cause harm.

– Leash Laws: Dogs should be restrained in public places. Owners in violation could be held accountable for negligence.

– Statute of Limitations: Under Illinois regulations, legal action must occur within two years from the date of the incident.

Understanding how insurance comes into play post a dog bite injury is essential too. Your homeowner’s insurance may cover damages related to such an incident; however, there could be exclusions based on breed type or previous incidents involving pets’ aggression.

Securing professional legal counsel like Carlson Bier will ensure that qualified experts extensively evaluate these multiple complexities involved in dog bite cases. Our committed team provides personalized attention coupled with aggressive representation designed towards achieving maximum compensation possible under applicable laws.

Moreover, our approach extends far beyond winning monetary damages alone; it encompasses restoring dignity and normality back into your life since such events may often lead to anxiety or intense fear around dogs—impacting overall quality of life significantly.

Preventative measures such as sending awareness letters about potential risk associated with specific dogs or advocating for tighter community-based leash laws serve as testimonials displaying our commitment towards curbing dog related danger across neighborhoods while simultaneously serving clients individually during predicaments overlapping this distinct niche.

Our team champions a protocol ensuring meticulous documental preservation soon after such an incident. Tangible evidence like medical reports, photographs of injuries, witness records, etc., play pivotal roles in forming strong claims. The legal timeline for dog bite injury cases can be quite stringent; hence swift action is encouraged from victims seeking rightful compensation.

Navigating these complex pieces making up a personal injury lawsuit might seem overwhelming just when healing physically and emotionally should take priority. This is why partnering with Carlson Bier to represent you during these times will definitely pay dividends down the line.

In Illinois state law, it’s important to remember that we cannot advertise offices in cities where we lack physical presence – rest assured, your convenience remains our priority as we work tirelessly across multiple jurisdictions without stretching boundaries set by professional regulations. We deeply appreciate your understanding on this matter!

Providing clients crucial education about navigating incidents surrounding dog-bite injuries alongside exemplary legal representation forms the crux of our mission at Carlson Bier, demystifying complexities associated with such events while ensuring that justice is served robustly and efficiently.

Ready to explore how much value your case holds? Our qualified legal professionals are here to lead the way. Click on the button below now and resolve the uncertainties clouding around potential compensations due towards a life-altering dog bite experience.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hamilton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hamilton

Areas of Practice in Hamilton

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying professional legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing expert legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Injuries

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents gain fair recompense for harms and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending professional legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Committed to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Committed to defending clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​