...

Bicycle Accidents in Harrison

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a bicycle accident, it’s essential to have a competent and highly skilled legal team on your side. Carlson Bier, a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, has gained an exceptional reputation for their relentless pursuit of fairness and justice in bicycle related incidents. Our expertise is unrivaled when it comes to addressing cases involving bicyclist rights and safety regulations. We don’t just represent clients; we strive to educate them about legislation surrounding cycling accidents for heightened awareness and preventative measures. At Carlson Bier, our goal is not merely winning cases; instead, we combine our legal knowledge with empathy so that any victim of unfortunate circumstances feels genuinely taken care of during this challenging period. As seasoned professionals with extensive experience managing diverse cases throughout Illinois enforces why select us as proficient Bicycle Accidents lawyers. Trusting us at Carlson Bier means entrusting your case in hands committed to safeguarding your rights while striving relentlessly for the best possible outcome – because everyone deserves access to uncompromising justice after being involved in an agonizing bicycle accident.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Harrison Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the profound and life-changing implications of bicycle accidents. As a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, we possess extensive experience when it comes to providing legal support for individuals who have been involved in such unfortunate incidents. Our team possesses exceptional knowledge regarding the complexities that surround this particular domain of law, ensuring aggressive yet empathetic representation for our clients.

Bicycle accidents can result in severe physical injuries and significant psychological trauma, both needing immediate attention and care. Yet what entrances the scope of these mishaps is the legal hassle that victims may find themselves embroiled within post occurrence. This includes ascertaining fault determination, insurance claims process or possibly claiming compensation from negligent parties.

To better navigate through these challenges, let’s unlock some key facts about bicycle accident cases:

• Negligence: In many instances, car drivers are found were negligent due to speeding or other traffic violations resulting in bicyclist injury.

• Visibility: Accidents can occur due to lack of visibility on behalf of cyclists – often attributed to inadequate safety gear or low light conditions.

• Intersection Dangers: A considerable number of accidents happen at intersections where drivers may fail to yield correctly to cyclists.

• Non-Contact Incidents: Cyclists often resorting evasive maneuvers to avoid collisions which could lead them into dangerous situations even if contact with another vehicle doesn’t take place.

However daunting might these factors seem, it’s essential not conflating your rights with probabilities; instead focus on seeking the assistance of seasoned professionals adept at handling similar cases – like us at Carlson Bier. We aim at constructing an incisive case dossier highlighting every minute detail including eyewitness reports, relevant camera footages and medical records so as bring out each aspect pertaining your case rightfully well acknowledged during its hearing.

Our meticulous approach ensures no stone remains unturned when it comes to reinforcing your claims with absolute veracity. Additionally, we remain uncompromisingly dedicated to obtaining maximum compensation for our clients, acknowledging their pain, suffering and richness of life lost due to such mishaps. Over the years, we have successfully helped many bicyclists reclaim substantial monetary settlements necessary for managing medical bills along with compensating their emotional turmoil experienced during recovery.

We also endorse the provision for a deeper understanding regarding our holistic practice – enabling you visiting our extensive library of resources that offers informative content relating diverse legal perspectives. These are encased within simple yet comprehensive language ensuring universal comprehension amongst readers irrespective underlying proficiency in legal parlance.

And while accidents do unhappily occur regardless how much precaution is taken, it’s viable fortifying oneself with accurate knowledge so as fend off unwarranted complications future may hold post occurrence. At Carlson Bier, our commitment endows not just towards swift resolution your case but empowering yourself against any potential adversities henceforth with well-informed decision-making.

With all this at your disposal which could prove invaluable throughout your ongoing journey towards justice, why hesitate taking bold steps forward? You’re invited clicking on the button below – allowing us assessing exactly how much worth your case holds. Remember, every minute passing by poses critical impact upon stature of claims hence imminent need seeking prompt professional assistance cannot be overstressed more than this point ever has been. Allow us serving best interests closer and faster – today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Harrison Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Harrison

Areas of Practice in Harrison

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving professional legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Clinical Negligence

Extending expert legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, extending expert legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents get appropriate recompense for harms and damages.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering specialist legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Building Incidents

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Specializing in providing specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to representing victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer