...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Harrison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Seeking reliable representation for a dog bite injury in Harrison? Look no further than Carlson Bier. Passionately dedicated to victims of personal injuries, our law firm specializes in handling complex dog bite cases with professionalism and sensitivity. We are not merely attorneys – we stand by your side as legal advocates, ensuring that your rights are upheld throughout the litigation process. Armed with comprehensive knowledge of Illinois’ specific laws regarding animal attacks, we analyze every aspect of the incident to build solid defenses on behalf of our clients. The aftermath of a traumatic event like a dog bite demands more than just medical attention; it requires adept legal protection too! Our aim at Carlson Bier is not only about winning rightful compensation but being instrumental in trauma recovery through law & order pursuit practice.Come learn why individuals across Illinois trust us during their hour-of-need following injuries from devastating canine attacks – get unparalleled support from seasoned lawyers at Carlson Bier today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Harrison Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent individuals who have suffered from unfortunate incidents, including dog bite injuries. One of the most common personal injury cases stems from such events—both physically and emotionally traumatic encounters with dogs that can often radically alter a person’s life. As part of our commitment to providing comprehensive legal support for our clients in Illinois, we strive to educate you on significant points related to dog bite injuries.

Understanding the nature and impact of dog bite injuries is imperative. Bite wounds vary significantly based upon the size and breed of the dog involved, leaving victims with mild to severe physical damage. These harms range from surface wounds like abrasions and punctures or deep tissue damage like tears and crush impacts, which could involve lengthy recovery periods.

• Severe scars and disfigurement

• Infections caused by bacteria-rich saliva

• Rabies exposure risk

• Psychological trauma leading to anxiety or fear around animals

Dog bites are far more than minor inconveniences—they can lead to serious complications that significantly affect a victim’s quality of life.

Knowing your rights in the wake of a dog bite injury is crucial too. Here in Illinois, we operate under the ‘strict liability’ rule applied towards animal attacks. This means that regardless of prior knowledge about their pet’s aggressive behavior, an owner is responsible for damages caused by their pet biting someone—even with no history of previous aggression.

Necessary considerations when building a strong case include:

• Verification: Documented medical bills detailing the extent of physical harm.

• Event context: Whether such event occurred while lawfully present on private property.

• Negligence: If homeowners’ negligence contributed directly or indirectly—the leash law violation being one example.

A well-established personal injury claim should emphasize proving these vital aspects. Successful claims highlight how victims’ everyday lives have been drastically altered due to the accident—showing a clear link between incident support actions taken for recovery.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t just progress your legal claim; we actively assist you in rebuilding your life without bearing the financial burden. If you or a loved one is suffering from a dog bite injury, it’s essential to understand that you are not alone. With Carlson Bier by your side, you are empowered with insightful information and supportive attorneys well-versed in Illinois personal injury law.

With years of experience as an Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, our expertise extends to representing victims of dog bite injuries effectively—seeking justice and compensation owed to you. Unlike numerous other firms, we believe in providing each client with dedicated time and attention since every case holds unique aspects needing specific considerations for favorable outcomes.

Adding value to our clients’ experiences remains at the center of what we do. Our skilled team provides comprehensive assessment strategies involving medical professionals and reconstructive surgeons when needed—to accurately evaluate all damage incurred during such incidents, laying grounds for accurate claim valuations.

Ours is not only about fighting legal battles but creating lasting relationships built on trust, understanding, compassion—the foundations contrasting us from others within this profession. Within these lines of tireless service backed by knowledge depth lies the beauty; empowering victims with high-quality informative content shaped towards imparting knowledge about things truly important after all—your rights and wellbeing here ultimately matter most.

Our detailed website contains extensive resources where even more details can be found about dog bite injury claims—we remain committed towards fostering education alongside effective representation consistently throughout all stages involved.

To find out how much your case could potentially be worth—and walk upon this path toward recovery excellence—click on the button below now. Carlson Bier stands ready to offer expert advice aligned toward enhancing holistic wellbeing through delivering rightful justice deserved through ensuring what matters is adequately addressed—let’s navigate this journey together today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Harrison Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Harrison

Areas of Practice in Harrison

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving professional legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Fall Injuries

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for hurts and losses.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Providing experienced legal representation for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Building Crashes

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Expert in extending expert legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Specializing in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​