...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hometown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a devastating spinal cord injury, the decision of who to trust as your personal legal champion requires careful consideration. Carlson Bier is an unparalleled choice in this matter. With a profound dedication to their profession and deep-rooted understanding of Illinois law, they are prepared to represent you with expertise and integrity. Their focus on spinal cord injuries gives them particular insight into such cases; it’s not just about winning, but also making sure clients obtain fair compensation for medical expenses, lost earnings and pain or suffering endured due to these tragic occurrences. This compassionate yet tenacious team understands that every case is unique- requiring individual attention. Despite the complexity of spinal cord injury lawsuits, Carlson Bier will effortlessly navigate through the intricacies of your circumstance providing proficient counsel at every turn – offering reassurance in your time distress. In matters as significant as these where life-altering repercussions weigh heavily upon its victims’ shoulders; rely on Carlson Bier – The Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney Group distinguished by their unwavering commitment towards justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hometown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that spinal cord injuries have life-altering implications that impact not just the physical aspect of one’s life but also induces significant financial and emotional burdens. Our premier law firm, based in Illinois specializes in representing victims of personal injury cases, specifically those involving severe spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries largely alter a person’s way of living – changing their mobility while leading to potential lifelong complications. It happens when there is any damage to the spinal cord that blocks communication between the brain and the body. The severity can range from causing temporary numbness or weakness to full-blown paralysis – conditions which are not only physically taxing but also emotionally distressing for both the affected individuals and their loved ones.

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: This results in losing all sensory functions and ability to control movement below the level of injury.

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Here, some motor or sensory function remains below the impacted area.

Notably, indirect costs such as loss of wages, modification of homes for wheelchair access, can pile up making this an even heavier burden.

Carlson Bier has a comprehensive understanding gathered over years of experience regarding these types of cases. We’re resolute in ensuring our clients receive maximum compensation for medical expenses related to their spinal cord injury.. Factors like pain and suffering, future medical costs, lost income due to disability or hindered capacity types will be comprehensively taken into account during case evaluation.

Accidents leading to spinal cord injuries can occur anywhere – at work, home or on roadways brought about by vehicular accidents etc. There are different legal approaches dependent on each situation:

• Negligence claims: If another party’s negligence claimed your health then filing a claim against them may grant you adequate compensation.

• Product liability: Manufacturers are held liable if their defective product led directly to your injury.

What makes us stand out at Carlson Bier is our sincere commitment towards our clients and their recovery from spinal cord injury. Our attorneys are not just competent legal professionals but also compassionate individuals understanding the hardship that this situation puts on one and their family.

If you’ve experienced a life-altering spinal cord injury due to another’s negligence or as a result of malfunctioning product, it is vital to consult an attorney who specializes in personal injury law. An experienced lawyer can help you navigate your rights and find all possible avenues of compensation for medical expenses, pain & suffering, loss of earnings and other related costs to lighten this burden.

At Carlson Bier, we’re committed to standing strong with you throughout this journey – tirelessly working for the justice you deserve while providing the support needed during these tough times…offering comprehensive guidance every step of the way, ensuring no stone is unturned in our pursuit for justice on your behalf!

Leveraging years of experience in representing victims who suffered spinal cord injuries enables us at Carlson Bier to handle complex cases effectively – navigating through daunting legal processes while advocating fiercely ensuring maximum compensation that covers any future treatment plans or impacts on work life post-injury.

Based strictly within Illinois’ legislative requirements – clear communication is a key element at Carlson Bier – making certain even complex legal terms become easily digestible information by anyone! Transparency coupled with knowledge sharing makes sure we’re collaborating rather than imposing.

Facing any type of severe injury without proper representation can leave victims feeling helpless amidst the legal nuances rolled up against them. By having Carlson Brier alongside – our dedicated team will relieve those stresses while delivering robust representation needed in such instances.

In closing, please remember that if you or someone around you has endured serious spinal cord injuries inflicted by external negligence or faulty products – reach out and let us guide you towards justice….

Should you wish to explore further about how much your case could potentially be worth or have questions concerning specific situations… feel free to click on the button below. Let the knowledge and relentless dedication of Carlson Bier match up to your courage and resilience at this challenging phase.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hometown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hometown

Areas of Practice in Hometown

Cycling Collisions

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing professional legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending expert legal support for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain fair payout for harms and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing specialist legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Building Crashes

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to providing expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​