...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hull

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you suffer from dog bite injuries, it can be an exceptionally traumatic experience. The Carlson Bier law firm understands the legal complexities surrounding such predicaments. Known for providing expert legal assistance during these turbulent times, Carlson Bier specializes in Dog Bite Injuries cases across Illinois, rendering impeccable services that cover medical expenses and seek justice for your distressing ordeal. We maintain our client’s trust through a relentless commitment to explaining every detail of the case without convoluting legal jargon or creating false hopes.

We keep abreast of all current laws regarding dog bites injury lawsuits in specific areas such as Hull, ensuring your rights are effectively represented within statutory jurisdictions despite stringent local ordinances. So even if we’re not physically present in Hull due to Illinois’ advertising regulations, our expertise transcends geographical bounds to provide proficient representation against negligent pet owners. In essence, when you choose Carlson Bier as your trusted allies following a dog bite incident,you have chosen a premier law firm dynamically suited to turn distress into relief with unyielding tenacity and flawless execution of duties.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hull Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and distress that can result from dog bite injuries. Our expertise in this realm of personal injury law has helped countless individuals in Illinois get rightly compensated for their experiences. We believe in being not just your legal representatives, but also a source of solace during trying times.

Dog bites might seem trivial to those who have been fortunate enough never to experience them, however, they can lead to severe physical harm and emotional stress. In some extreme cases, victims may require extensive medical treatment or surgeries. It’s essential to recognize the potential implications of such incidents and take necessary legal action if you find yourself in an unfortunate situation involving a dog bite.

As experienced professionals dealing with dog bite incidences routinely:

• We’re capable of guiding you through the complex process involved in making a successful claim.

• Understand that proving liability is often complicated in these circumstances; it requires skilled litigators well-versed with relevant laws.

• Know firsthand how significant medical expenses can be after a dog bite incident. From general check-ups and tetanus shots to sutures or even plastic surgery – costs add up quickly.

• Acknowledge that emotional distress following such traumatic events is as substantial as any physical injury – loss of enjoyment of life activities, fear of dogs affecting lifestyle changes are considered while estimating rightful compensation.

No one should have to navigate through these intricacies alone following such a traumatic event; having reliable legal representation creates all the difference for your recovery and overall well-being. Our proficient team at Carlson Bier identifies every possible channel for compensation uniquely suited for your personal story.

In Illinois, the Animal Control Act provides coverage for victims bitten by dogs without requiring proof of previous violent tendencies (Be careful not to imply this protection extends beyond state boundaries). Further, If someone commits an act contributing towards their biting like provoking the dog explicitly – they might not be covered under this act’s safety net. Our astute legal team can help evaluate your situation to make informed decisions best.

You need not worry about the high costs typically associated with legal assistance. At Carlson Bier, we operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning that unless we successfully win your case and recover compensation for you – there are no fees.

Our legal acumen combined with our deep sense of compassion allows us to serve as strong advocates for dog bite victims in Illinois. To get started on this process – gather essential details linked to your incident such as place & time, owner details (if known), photographs of injuries and location; any witnesses present during the incident.

To advocate effectively on your behalf, timely access to these necessary resources is incredibly helpful. We understand that gathering this information might become complicated due to injury severity or emotional trauma – but rest assured we’re here to guide you every step of the way.

At Carlson Bier, client satisfaction fuels our determination. While many law firms may consider a personal injury case just another file number-we see you as an individual who’s faced an unforeseen situation and deserves justice.

Before heading towards any claims process-it’s crucial one understands potential outcomes and processes involved. Towards this end-we invite you to find out what monetary value could potentially be associated with your distinctive claim by clicking on the button below. Each case carries unique aspects and it’s important one realizes their possible entitlements before proceeding forward.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hull Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hull

Areas of Practice in Hull

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering adept legal advice for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering experienced legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal services to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Slip Accidents

Professional in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for damages and damages.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Delivering professional legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Impairment

Focused on supporting persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​