Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Itasca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering the aftermath of a dog bite injury, it’s essential to secure legal representation that fully understands Illinois law and executes aggressive advocacy for victims. At Carlson Bier Associates LLP, the seasoned attorneys utilize their expertise in personal injury law, specifically dog bite injuries cases, striving tirelessly for your rightful compensation. Comprehending local ordinances in various cities like Itasca is fundamental; you can rest assured that we have thorough knowledge and experience required to navigate these specific scenarios effectively. Our reputable team reviews case details meticulously, examining all avenues to strengthen our legal arguments tailored uniquely for each case—the aim? Holding liable parties accountable while emphasizing fair treatment throughout proceedings with empathy as an integral part of our ethos. Negative experiences stemming from canine aggression should not deprive one of justice or ease–that’s why choosing Carlson Bier makes all the difference in achieving conciliation post such distressful incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Itasca Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are premier personal injury attorneys based in Illinois that are dedicated to providing comprehensive counsel on an array of personal injury scenarios. One such case which often goes undiscussed is Dog Bite Injuries- and this page aims at shedding detailed light on the same. We understand how a peaceful afternoon walk can turn into a traumatic event within seconds due to a dog bite. Statistics suggest that 4.7 million people become victims of dog bites each year in the U.S., with children being more commonly affected.

Dog bites may seem minor but their ramifications can be severe. They involve not only physical harm but psychological distress as well, making it crucial for you to know your legal rights if bitten by a dog. Regardless of whether you were attacked unprovoked, or even while pettingthe dog with consent from its owner—it’s important to realize that you have viable legal recourse should things go south.

There are key elements to keep in mind concerning any Dog Bite Injury:

• Immediate medical attention: Ensure timely medical aid following the incident so injuries don’t worsen over time.

• Report the incident: It aids investigation processes while equipping authorities with valuable insights about potentially aggressive pets.

• Documentation: Records, including medical reports and photographs of injuries enhance proof when building up your case

• Witness accounts: Testimonies from bystanders boost credibility, enhancing chances of compensation

Certain factors can significantly affect the validity and potential outcome of your claim, like if you trespassed or provoked the animal— these constitute defenses an opposition lawyer might use against you.

Needless to say, understanding legal jargon amid recuperating from an unpleasant episode isn’t every victim’s cup of tea. That is exactly where our role becomes integral. At Carlson Bier, we undertake meticulous investigations using professional resources – evaluating evidence provided by both parties involved before laying out potential directions your case could take.

The Illinois law accommodates a ‘strict liability rule’ which holds the dog owner responsible irrespective of the dog’s previous antics. However, to constitute a legit case, some aspects need to be proven:

• The defendant is indeed the offending dog’s owner

• You were behaving peaceably when bitten

• You did not provoke the animal

• The incident occurred while on public property or lawfully present in private space

As you confront this ordeal, we ascertain our full support until justice is meted out. Our seasoned team of attorneys will guide you through each step, meticulously preparing your case for both settlement negotiations and possible trial scenarios.

Determining compensation for Dog Bite Injuries calls for factoring in medical expenses (both current and future), wage loss due to non-attendance at work, emotional distress as well as any lasting disfigurements or disabilities incurred by the victim. We strive hard to ensure every aspect of your suffering is compensated fairly.

At Carlson Bier, our role goes beyond merely providing legal help— we empathize with your predicament and go that extra mile in ensuring that justice isn’t hampered by financial constraints hence operate on a contingency fee basis so that you’re only charged if there’s successful recovery.

Trust us with your burden— it’s no more daunting than jumping over a garden hose once you’ve navigated under skilled guidance like ours. If faced with a daunting personal injury scenario such as a Dog Bite Injury – know that we stand firmly beside you– every step of the way! For more specifics about how much your case might be worth – click below! By leveraging our years of expertise and unstinted dedication towards safeguarding our client’s interests—you’d pave brighter paths ahead amid these trying times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Itasca Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Itasca

Areas of Practice in Itasca

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Giving specialist legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Carelessness

Extending expert legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Incidents

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents obtain fair recompense for damages and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Extending experienced legal services for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Building Collisions

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on delivering dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Focused on supporting patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer