...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kankakee

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury in Kankakee, securing legal representation from Carlson Bier will ensure your interests are paramount. As personal injury lawyers with an extensive track record handling Dog Bite Injuries cases, we approach each case with skillful determination to secure the compensation our clients deserve. We acknowledge that these incidents can cause physical and emotional distress; therefore, it’s important to trust respected attorneys who understand Illinois law fully. At Carlson Bier, our team is proficient in representing victims of such injuries ensuring you receive a fair claim for medical expenses, lost wages or suffering endured due to negligence or an uncontrolled animal. You’ll discover that choosing us translates into comprehensive knowledge on legal facts around this topic and formidable litigation strategies enhanced by years of experience. Let Carlson Bier be your guiding hand through the complexities surrounding Dog Bite Injury claims– trust us with crafting the argument beneficial to reclaiming equilibrium after such an unnerving incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kankakee Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and emotional trauma that a dog bite injury can cause. Being bitten by a dog can be an extremely distressing experience leading to serious injuries that may require extensive medical attention or even cause permanent disfigurement. As experienced personal injury attorneys serving Illinois residents, our mission is to help victims of dog bite incidents comprehend their legal rights and use them effectively for their financial recovery.

Exploring our client-centric approach at Carlson Bier, you’ll find that emphasis is fixed on compassionately addressing every individual’s unique situation. We know better than anyone how critical it is to make informed decisions after undergoing such a traumatic event like a dog bite. To support this fact-gathering process, we’d like to share some crucial aspects about dog bite injuries:

• Under the Illinois Animal Control Act (ACA), any person suffering harm from an animal attack can hold the owner legally responsible.

• Generally, homeowners’ insurance policy often covers monetary compensation for dog bites.

• The ACA also holds owners accountable if their dogs injure someone off-property, if the owner negligently allows the pet out.

Furthermore, understanding your right as a victim necessitates recognizing two significant statutes in Illinois law; ‘strict liability theory’ and ‘one-bite rule’. It’s important to understand these laws especially as strict liability theory obviates necessity for evidence of previous aggression by defendant’s pet whilst one-bite rule insinuates no responsibility on part of pet owner unless they were aware of potential harmful behavior.

Dog attacks can lead to significantly multifaceted consequences impacting not just physically but emotionally too. This could range from persistent fright and depression related repercussions thus demanding complete psychological wellness treatment regime besides standard medical care. Victims potentially develop cynophobia (fear of dogs) possibly restricting them from fully participating in usual outdoor activities.

However why endure physical discomfort or limit lifestyle adjustments owing back from somebody else’s negligence?

Let Carlson Bier attorneys assist you in exercising legal rights deservedly receiving due compensation.

While medical costs are a significant part of your monetary recovery, other damages under the ACA remain overlooked. Keep this important point in mind:

• Compensation applies beyond hospital bill coverage or therapy required; it encompasses sufferings endured from loss of normalcy (due to scar mark left by dog-bite for example) not forgetting the pain and suffering inflicted mentally too.

At Carlson Bier, fighting for your rights comes from a place of empathy driven desire to restore quality life standards as much as possible post incident impact.

With a robust combination of substantial court experience coupled with our intimate knowledge about Illinois-specific statutes and case law governing dog bites, we facilitate comprehensive evaluation addressing each potential aspect of claims’ process. This latter can be intimidatingly daunting especially when facing keen and cunning insurance company lawyers.

Why bear that burden alone? Let Carlson Bier support you righteously defending your interests.

Carlson Bier offers more than representation acting intending all-around counselor extending help understanding every bit effectively guiding through challenging journey post-dog-bite path leading to rightful compensation providing personal touch throughout! Our extensive experience with similar cases allows us familiarization anticipating potential obstacles whilst delivering most effective strategy tailored for specific bends unique to every case.

Finally, if you have been victimized by a dog bite injury within Illinois boundaries, step forward protecting your rights adhering guidance from seasoned professionals like us at Carlson Bier. Don’t keep guessing how much recompense you deserve while struggling with unwarranted stress tying up loose ends after traumatic incident clouding judgment. Click on the button below for an expert calculation regarding worthiness pertinent to your situation ensuring not leaving any stone unturned holding pet owner(s) accountable deploying comprehensive claim reflecting full extent of injuries suffered deserving appropriate financial recovery mutually discussed upon!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Kankakee Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kankakee

Areas of Practice in Kankakee

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing adept legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering experienced legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents obtain appropriate settlement for harms and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Collision

Delivering experienced legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in providing professional legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Damage

Committed to advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​