...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Keithsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Enduring the hardship of a pedestrian accident is an overwhelming experience that demands swift and competent legal support. When seeking exceptional legal representation in Keithsburg, Carlson Bier uniquely stands out for their proficiency in handling Pedestrian Accidents cases. This highly-revered personal injury law firm has made substantial strides in protecting victims’ rights and ensuring they receive deserved compensation. Leveraging years of expertise, they comprehend the subtleties involved with these particular cases: from determining liability to negotiating settlements or taking matters to trial if required. Their thorough understanding of Illinois laws offers clients enhanced opportunities for favorable results; this complemented by their unwavering dedication makes them a notable choice when necessitating aid for such distressing circumstances. So if you’ve sadly experienced a pedestrian accident, choosing Carlson Bier represents choosing adept counsel prepared and committed to champion your interests energetically until justice is served. Trust the renowned team at Carlson Bier – it’s not just about winning your case; it centers on rebuilding lives after trauma through comprehensive legal assistance that consistently yields successful protests towards claim resolution.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Keithsburg Illinois

Pedestrian accidents can derive from a variety of intricate circumstances resulting in severe injury or even fatality. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with an unwavering focus on assisting victims of pedestrian accidents in Illinois and navigating the oftentimes complex legal proceedings associated with these accident claims. Our experienced attorneys work zealously to safeguard your rights and procure fair compensation directly proportional to the damages endured.

The crux of understanding pedestrian accidents lies primarily in grasping that they typically involve a collision between a vehicle and a person on foot; however, incidents involving cyclists, electric scooter riders, or other non-motorized users also fall within this category. These types of unfortunate events can occur due to myriad reasons such as drunk driving, distracted driving, reckless or negligent behavior by the driver, poor street lighting, damaged pavements, or lack of pedestrian signals at intersections. However you zero down on it – whether it’s breaking traffic rules or flouted safety norms – the result is often distressing for pedestrians involved.

It’s facetious how certain key factors make complex situations easier to understand when addressed outright:

• Severity: Pedestrians lacking any formative protection against high-speed vehicles can suffer gravely from multiple injuries ranging from fractures or dislocations to traumatic brain injuries.

• Liability: The motorist involved is usually held accountable for such mishaps unless strong proof indicates otherwise.

• Insurance Issues: It may get complicated bearing medical bills and unexpected expenses while colliding insurance companies come into play debating over liabilities.

• Legal Representation: Professional aid through skilled lawyers like us at Carlson Bier is pivotal right from gathering evidence to negotiating settlements ensuring justice prevails precisely where needed.

To ascertain optimum recovery after enduring an accident initiating professional consultation with our expert attorneys would be considered judicious since achieving lawful entitlements involves considerable complexities including successful dialogue with insurance adjusters along strategizing rightful lawsuits if required thereby bolstering your chances towards just recompense.

At Carlson Bier, our determination accentuates to aggressively advocate for our clients while providing compassionate personal service. For every case we accept, a detailed investigation ensures we identify who was in the wrong and to clarify their legal obligations towards your compensation. Within the legal parameters of Illinois law, this stance of ours is unflinchingly devoted to maintaining transparency with you helping hand-in-hand throughout your journey from incident till recuperation.

Paramount within our ethos lies a personalized approach enabling us to take time comprehending each individual’s unique circumstances—this could range from the medical impact they bear due to accident repercussions or the financial strain on families struggling amidst loss of income or expensive hospital bills.

Having delineated succinctly yet meaningfully about Pedestrian Accidents’ depth and complexity contextually within Illinois laws – concrete assurance can be extended about the profound understanding along persistent commitment that lawyers at Carlson Bier share desiring nothing but justice facilitated through deserved reparations. Profoundly aware about our roles being specialized personal injury attorneys it is unquestionable as to where our allegiance lies – Fighting against all odds solely for victim’s welfare resulting in eased recoveries while simultaneously ensuring incumbent parties are held accountable.

Knowing one’s rights after an accident sometimes just isn’t enough. You need someone who will stand by you, guide you through these challenging times – This essentially underlines why partnering with dedicated & experienced professional consultation becomes integral especially when dealing with reinsurances after enduring grave pedestrian accidents.

We encourage readers interested in discussing their experiences further to contact us using the form below via clicking on ‘Get a quote’. By answering a few simple questions, we can give transit victims a clearer picture of what type and amount of compensation might be fair considering their specific factors influencing both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages resultant out from regretful pedestrian accidents.

Click now on the button below, let’s work together substantially towards claiming what you rightfully deserve. Find out how much your case is worth right now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Keithsburg Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Keithsburg

Areas of Practice in Keithsburg

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering adept legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, providing expert legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for wounds and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Specializing in providing specialized legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on assisting persons with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer