Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Lake Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking a spinal cord injury attorney in the Lake Barrington area, Carlson Bier stands out as an exceptional choice. Our expert team handles cases with utmost professionalism and profound understanding, using their deep knowledge of personal injury law to maximize your compensation. We realize that every spinal cord injury brings unique challenges; we are prepared to address these complexities head-on for our clients. Priding ourselves on pursuing justice diligently and fervently, our law firm remains dedicated in supporting you through this critical time in life with compassion and empathy ensuring that your rights are respected at every turn. The unyielding commitment from our experienced attorneys is crucial against challenging insurance companies or at fault parties involved in this unfortunate incidence giving you the best chance of achieving a favorable resolution. Let Carlson Bier manage legal complications leaving you free to focus solely on recouping health wise—a substantial reason why hundreds have already made us their preferred partner during such trying times. Trust us today for unparalleled legal services!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Lake Barrington Illinois

Spinal Cord Injuries represent a serious and life-altering event, often resulting in devastating physical, emotional, and financial consequences for the victim and their loved ones. Carlson Bier takes pride in offering comprehensive legal services to victims of such injuries in Illinois.

Comprehending Spinal Cord Injuries isn’t straightforward. It involves understanding intricate medical terminology and assessing how these aggravating incidents can dramatically change an individual’s life course. Your spinal cord is a complex structure encompassing vital nerve tissues transmitting signals between your brain and body parts. Any compromise on its integrity due to abrupt trauma or gradual disease leads to impaired motor functions, sensation loss, or most unfortunate – paralysis.

Here are few key considerations regarding spinal cord injuries:

– Medical payments: Extensive treatment costs including surgeries, medications, rehabilitative therapies inevitably imperil victims financially.

– Loss of income: Depending upon the severity of injury, earning ability might be disrupted partially or wholly leading to significant financial hardships.

– Pain and suffering: Physical discomfort and psychological distress incurred by spinal cord injury is inherently devastating.

– Future care requirements: Permanent nature of injurious debilities necessitates ongoing care possibly extending over a lifetime.

As committed advocates at Carlson Bier firm steeped in deep understanding of spinal cord injuries damages; we strive tirelessly to quantify your rightful compensations accurately accounting all economic implications while empathetically acknowledging non-economic impacts like pain-suffering-discomfort inflicted on you.

Besides dealing with insurmountable challenges engendered by debilitating conditions; Victims are also burdened with navigating through intricate complexities of Illinois personal injury laws which mandate establishing negligence as causality criteria for compensation claims success. This essentially means demonstrating that some other party’s reckless action or omission caused the accident injuring your spine.

Complexity intensifies further given fact that multiple actors may have contributed to our client’s misfortune mandating coordinating with multiple insurance companies – each having its intentions set on minimizing settlement payouts necessitating skilled negotiations to procure commensurate compensation.

• Comparative Fault: Our state’s personal injury laws incorporate the comparative fault principle, which reduces your compensation proportionally if you were partially at fault for the accident causing your spinal cord injury.

• Statute of Limitations: Typically Illinois imposes a two-year limitation from the date of the accident for filing a lawsuit for personal injuries. However, exceptions do exist demanding expert strategic planning to ensure preserving our client’s right to legal recourse in extenuating circumstances where discovery of injury trailed occurrence date.

Carlson Bier’s hallmark lies entrenched in its tailored approach towards each client we represent integrating profound medical insights with extensive experience honed over years successfully navigating intricate intricacies of spinal cord injury claims offering this unflinching commitment – No victory, no fee!

Spinal Cord Injury cases unequivocally carry incredible stakes and demand sharp intuitions, acumen equipped with an empathetic insight. We shoulder your burden structured on this unwavering promise – You concentrate on regaining equilibrium in life while letting us relentlessly pursue justice rallying around you seeking best possible compensation deserved by you!! We are not just attorneys; we stand as pillars providing affirming strength when upheaval becomes unbearable anchoring you with unwavering support guiding you through unchartered territories steering clear confident paths amidst dense foggy challenges.

Explore your Rightful Claim options now!! Get started by clicking on this link below. An experienced member of Carlson Bier team will promptly reach out discussing and evaluating real-time feasibilities associated with your case keeping confidentiality intact offering 24/7 accessibility characterized by compassionate lawyering nurtured inside Carlson Bier office doors never implying any connections or presence outside geographic boundaries… Experience personalized attention merging deft expertise profoundly invested into restoring hope-number won’t just reflect monetary figures rather encompass deeper essence reflecting restored peace-catharsis-recovery embodying holistic completeness giving back what Spinal Cord Injury took away… Take your first step towards reclaiming control of your life… Find out how much your case is worth by clicking on the button below!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Barrington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Lake Barrington

Areas of Practice in Lake Barrington

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing expert legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending professional legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal help for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Crash

Delivering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Building Mishaps

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on ensuring professional legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in managing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer