...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lake Forest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be disruptive and traumatizing. In these distressful situations, the Carlson Bier law firm steps in to provide expert legal counsel to help navigate through the complexities of personal injury law. Our well-versed attorney group has a specialization in handling dog bite injuries providing you with robust representation for your unique situation. We thoroughly understand Illinois’ stringent animal control laws and skillfully apply this knowledge when advocating for our clients. By choosing Carlson Bier as your personal lawyer, victims of dog bites can feel confident that they are putting their faith into an experienced team who prioritize their right to compensation–as is rightfully theirs under Illinois state law! So why wait? From negotiating settlements or aggressively litigating at trial if required – our lawyers are more than prepared to tackle each case head-on for fair resolution! Trust in the proven expertise of Carlson Bier; let us guide you on this road towards justice and healing.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lake Forest Illinois

With vast experience in the field, Carlson Bier is a renowned personal injury law firm specializes in an array of injury cases including dog bite injuries. Based in Illinois, we offer meticulous and personalized service to all our clients, ensuring that their legal rights are duly preserved and enforced.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical harm not limited merely to skin damage but extensive muscular or nerve trauma too. Unbeknownst to many victims, emotional suffering related to post-traumatic stress disorders escalates the impact of these injuries exponentially. At Carlson Bier, our main objective is to ensure that you comprehend every facet of your situation so you can make sound decisions for your optimal recuperation.

Educating yourself on specific factors concerning dog bite injuries and their subsequent legal realm adds significant value towards understanding your situation better.

• Dog owner liability: Predominantly within Illinois’ jurisdiction, dog owners are invariably liable if their dog causes an injury regardless if the canine had been aggressive before.

• Strict liability State: As a state exercising strict liability when it comes to matters pertaining animal attacks like dog bites, Illinois doesn’t necessitate proof of the culpability or negligence of the pet owner for the plaintiff’s case.

• Statute of Limitations: A pivotal aspect victims must remember—the deadline set to file a lawsuit which currently is two years from the date of incident in Illinois.

• Damage recovery options: Injuries suffered may qualify you for compensation covering medical bills & future treatments expenses along with wage loss reimbursement plus noneconomic damages offering recompense for mental anguish & physical pain.

Understanding these key elements significantly streamlines your expedition throughout this taxing journey. It allows for heightened cognizance regarding each step of this complex process as well as equips you with absolute confidence while approaching these circumstances.

Carlson Bier thrives on its commitment towards serving its clients diligently by providing not only immersive guidance based on abundant expertise but also heartening moral support during trying times. Past cases of dog bite injuries dealt by our committed teams have resulted in substantial compensations allowing victims to rebuild and recover life as extensively as possible. Our resourceful team is at your disposable, ready to vigorously represent you whilst lending a caring hand.

Empathy intertwines with professionalism to establish Carlson Bier’s service philosophy – offering legal advice that resonates with intricacies of the Illinois dog bite law while empathizing towards your plight. Striving to illuminate clear paths towards resolution for you, we offer comprehensive consultation aiming to relieve our clients from worry regarding any lack of knowledge or understanding concerning complicated legal procedures related to such an incident.

With various types and degrees of injury associated with dog bites – scarring, disfigurement, emotional trauma or even infections like Rabies & Tetanus – understanding their short term and long-term impact becomes crucial part of designing compensation claim strategy; an endeavor where our expertise significantly lightens your burden while bolstering chances of successful settlement.

On the journey toward recovery from unfortunate incidents like this, it’s important not just getting back on foot literally but also emotionally and financially – a process where we at Carlson Bier function tirelessly as your reliable navigator during these distressing phases.

We firmly stand by every victim enduring aftermaths of this distressing ordeal translating our earnest commitment into tangible results which are evident by histories enthusiastically shared majorly by those who were delightfully surprised discovering magnitude & utility of legal support enlisted leading eventually better coping mechanisms through hardships they endured.

And now that you’ve learned more about how Carlson Bier can help in turning around circumstances following a traumatizing experience like Dog Bite injuries, wouldn’t you want to know how much difference could such assistance really deliver would be? By clicking on the button below, find out how much your case is worth as first step on road back reclaiming life minus creasing brows over debilitating impacts caused unknowingly by someone else’s pet.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Forest Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lake Forest

Areas of Practice in Lake Forest

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying expert legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing expert legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Fall Occurrences

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Committed to supporting clients of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering experienced legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to representing persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer