Bicycle Accidents in Lakewood Shores

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unexpected occurrence of a bicycle accident, safeguarding your rights should be paramount. Carlson Bier is a distinguished law firm fully committed to serving individuals in Lakewood Shores who have experienced such mishaps. As seasoned personal injury attorneys, we specialize in many facets of this field, with an emphasis on accidents involving bicycles. Our team exhibits unmatched tenacity and legal proficiency when navigating multifaceted cases – leveraging our collective expertise for every client’s advantage. Striving beyond merely obtaining compensation for injuries sustained; we thoroughly research every claim to ensure all potential sources of liability are identified and pursued aggressively. Focusing heavily on meticulous case preparation while harboring abiding dedication to each client forms an intrinsic part of our distinctive approach towards these complex situations. Operating from Illinois – with deep familiarity encompassed by state laws – enables us confidently represent cyclists in Lakewood Shores seeking justice after distressing incidents. Trust Carlson Bier as your unwavering ally delivering exemplary service within Bicycle Accidents law sphere.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Lakewood Shores Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our robust team of personal injury attorneys specializes in providing expert legal assistance for Bicycle Accident victims. We are committed to meeting the unique needs of individuals who have suffered injuries due to negligent or reckless actions while cycling in Illinois and we strive consistently to ensure that each client receives comprehensive, customized support.

Cycling on Illinois roads can be a dangerous undertaking simply because cyclists are vulnerable. They lack the protective shell that motorists enjoy with vehicles, making them susceptible to grave injuries during an accident. Overlooked cyclist rights is another concern; often, drivers forget to share the road or just don’t recognize bikers’ rights on time leading to unfortunate accidents. After such collisions occur though, it’s critical you remember – like any auto-accident victim – bicycle accident victims have rights deserving protection!

• You have a right to compensation for medical bills

• You may also receive compensation for lost wages

• The pain and suffering endured as a result of the accident shouldn’t go uncompensated

• Compensation should cover costs for physical therapy or counseling needed after the incident

At Carlson Bier, we endeavor to protect these rights fervently. Our attorneys conduct thorough investigations into every case, scrutinizing all evidence available – from skid marks and damaged property at the scene of collision up through traffic camera footage and witness testimonials. As your representatives handling every interaction with insurance companies (whose main goal is usually limiting payouts), we advocate passionately for fair settlements reflecting true depth of any damages realized.

Our lawyers aim not just at analyzing your case critically but also educating you about relevant laws operational within Illinois State regulating Bicycle Accidents cases: their intricacies and complex jargon put out plainly. For instance,

• In an event where one runs red light signal causing a bike-car crash (or other incidences arising from flouting rules by a driver), know this automatically makes them liable (at-fault) legally.

• If unfortunately involved in a hit-and-run accident and the driver isn’t identified, legally you’re allowed to make an uninsured motorist claim under your cycle insurance or auto insurance.

• If your child under age 18 is in a bicycling accident and injuries are involved, you’ve up till their 20th birthday before deciding to bring forth any lawsuit.

Through this information resource on our website, we reinforce our commitment to transparency, providing every piece of knowledge necessary for making informed decisions regarding claims handling & potential lawsuits following Bicycle Accidents. Our dedicated team stands ready and relentless – committed fully not just towards fighting for rightful compensation but more importantly that victims get back on their feet as smooth as possible!

Lastly, remember broad experiences with diverse cycling cases have equipped us aptly to anticipate intricacies specific to your unique case. We understand how essential it is to proceed compassionately during these challenging times undertaking all sophisticated aspects linked with your case hence letting you focus solely on recovery!

Curious about what your Bike-Accident Lawsuit could be worth potentially? Take advantage of Carlson Bier’s no-obligation evaluation offer! Click on the button below now and receive expert analysis from experienced personal injury attorneys delivering valued insights into extent of damages recoverable through legal routes available at hand: without cost; without delay.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lakewood Shores Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lakewood Shores

Areas of Practice in Lakewood Shores

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Trip Mishaps

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Accident

Ensuring professional legal representation for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Focused on offering specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Injury

Expert in assisting clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer