FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lakewood Shores

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, choosing the right legal representation can make all the difference. That’s why discerning citizens select Carlson Bier, an accomplished personal injury firm based in Illinois and highly regarded for their expertise in Dog Bite Injuries law. Our seasoned attorneys understand the complex nature of these cases and foster a deep appreciation for your emotional recovery alongside seeking justice. We combine hands-on experience with unparalleled knowledge about Illinois law to determine viable options tailored to meet individual needs effectively. Identifying liability, foreseeing intricate insurance claims, accumulating medical expenses – we shoulder them all as your advocates delivering exceptional lawyering dedicated to safeguard your interests robustly. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize trustworthiness, efficient communication & supportive client service above all aspects which is reflected through our outstanding level of success rate throughout years-served courtrooms across numerous territories including Lakewood Shores vicinity—making us an indisputable choice when looking for skilled litigation experts specializing in Dog Bite Injuries related matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lakewood Shores Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we advocate for victims who have experienced the traumatic event of a dog bite. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we understand the gravity and severity of these incidents which can lead to debilitating injuries and emotional distress for you or your loved ones. Dog bites are serious matters that warrant comprehensive legal representation.

In some instances, people may underestimate the impact of dog bite injuries—these extend beyond physical harm. The potential ramifications encompass psychological trauma as well as hefty financial implications due to medical costs and requisite healing periods where one is unable to work. At Carlson Bier, we strive to educate our clients on these aspects.

Dog bites can result in varied injury types:

• Deep puncture wounds and lacerations

• Nerve damage leading to issues with mobility

• Psychological trauma manifesting as cynophobia (fear of dogs) or post-traumatic stress disorder

• Rare but extremely dangerous instances include transmission of rabies

Statistically speaking, Illinois consistently ranks among the states having the highest number of insurance claims related to dog bites across America.

This is why acquiring sound legal counsel post such an episode is essential.

In most cases within Illinois, it’s not required by law for victims or authorities to prove negligence on behalf of a dog owner for a claim—a simple occurrence verification suffices. This “strict liability” facet contributes significantly towards successful compensatory claims; however, few exclusions do exist which underline how fundamental a knowledgeable personal injury attorney becomes in navigating such complexities.

Representation from an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier ensures that each aspect pertaining to your case gets meticulously examined—from eyewitnesses’ accounts down to local leash laws—all culminating in fortifying your claim for its best likely outcome.

On selecting us at Carlson Bier, you gain more than just an attorney—you also gain insightful advisors working relentlessly on your behalf aiming for rightful compensation covering all accrued medical expenses, potential future treatment costs, lost wages, and damages for emotional distress. Our vast network of professionals includes dedicated case managers and medical experts meritably contributing to each client’s goal of achieving justice.

Lastly, we’d like to address the outreach of Carlson Bier. Although our digital presence extends across websites and social media platforms frequently targeting various regions in Illinois, it is crucial to understand that our physical offices are NOT located everywhere across this widespread geography. The semblance of ‘being everywhere’ is maintained merely to ensure accessibility and inclusivity for all potential clients regardless of their geolocation.

Carlson Bier proposes a partnership grounded firmly on expertise-acquired empathy coupled with successful results spanning decades—encompassing undeterred aggression when negotiating settlements for victims as well as throughout all court proceedings gearing towards optimal outcomes.

If entrusting us with your dog bite injury case appears suitable after reading through this extensive educational content, why not begin by assessing what worth your claim might hold? Locate the button below enabling you an instant evaluation against certain provided data-points permitting informed decision-making about proceeding legally post session conclusion—at no obligation.

Remember—you’re at no expense unless we secure a win statutorily relevant to your specific situation. Empower yourself today with Carlson Bier because we believe that every injured victim deserves committed legal allies championing their best interests unequivocally.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lakewood Shores Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lakewood Shores

Areas of Practice in Lakewood Shores

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending skilled legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Incidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Crash

Extending specialist legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Expert in ensuring expert legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Focused on supporting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440