FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Leland Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trust Carlson Bier in your pursuit of justice following a spinal cord injury. As seasoned personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we specialize in navigating the intricacies of cases related to devastating spinal cord injuries. We understand the life-altering impacts and complexities that these types of injuries can bring about. It’s this depth of understanding that drives our commitment to tirelessly advocate for your rights and demand fair compensation on your behalf.

Throughout Leland Grove, we are recognized for our dedication to clients dealing with serious injuries like those involving the spinal cord. Why? At Carlson Bier, every case is treated as unique – allowing us to develop personalized strategies aimed at achieving maximum compensation for you.

Our wealth of expertise has seen us secure impactful outcomes for countless clients across numerous cities including Leland Grove. With meticulous attention to detail coupled with an unwavering passion for delivering results; partnering with Carlson Bier ensures experienced legal representation throughout all stages, guaranteeing a profound level of support during challenging times where it matters most – securing you peace today and hopefulness tomorrow.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Leland Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your health and well-being are our topmost priorities as we serve Illinois with tried-and-true legal consultation in personal injury cases. Through decades of diverse experiences, we understand the high degree of psychological stress, financial burden, and physical pain associated with injuries sustained during an accident. Among the range of personal injuries that individuals may face, spinal cord injuries are considered among the most severe owing to their long-term implications on quality of life.

Spinal cord injuries involve damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal—a traumatic event that can not only have temporary repercussions but even permanent changes in strength, sensation, function below the site of injury. These injuries vary considerably in terms severity; while some result in complete paralysis (tetraplegia), others might cause slight asymmetrical weakness (hemiparesis). Consequently distinguishing between emergent forms—complete and incomplete—is crucial as it often determines the course and intensity of treatment and rehabilitation.

Here are key points about spinal cord injuries for your perusal:

– Often caused by a sudden blow or cut to one’s spine.

– Consequential alteration or loss in function like mobility or feeling.

– It’s usually classified into ‘complete’ (loss of all sensory & motor function below level) or ‘incomplete’ (some functioning remains).

In understanding what these nuances mean for you personally is where our team at Carlson Bier comes into play. Our experienced attorneys will decipher complex medical reports coupled with a rigorous investigation process that seeks to establish liability accurately — thereby strengthening your claim. Our aim is not just ensuring you get compensated appropriately for present needs but also future necessities considering possible long-term dysfunction.

As premier Illinois-based personal injury lawyers specializing in spinal cord claims, we wish to arm you with comprehensive knowledge regarding your rights after succumbing such an injury. The earlier you get started with your lawsuit after suffering from a debilitating trauma like the spinal cord injury, the more favorable is the chance of securing legitimate remuneration.

– Right to sue: In Illinois, you have two years from the day of your accident to file a lawsuit.

– Right to compensation: You are entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost earnings, disability, pain and suffering.

– Right to legal representation: It’s essential to hire an attorney who understands the nuances of personal injuries.

Laws in Illinois state that attorneys shouldn’t advertise or imply office locations where they don’t physically exist. Hence it must be made clear that we proudly serve all areas within Illinois without our services being confined by geographical constraints — what matters most us is seeking justice on behalf of victims irrespective of where they reside. We at Carlson Bier do not claim physical presence in Leland Grove or use misleading phrases such as ‘personal lawyer in Leland Grove’ as it clearly violates

There’s no denying that contending with spinal cord injuries can be challenging; prevailing residual discomforts might impact productivity profoundly along periods where personal finances become strained due to continuing medical check-ups or inpatient treatments. But even through these hardships, remember you’re not alone—we stand by our unwavering commitment towards addressing your concerns empathetically, equipping you with valuable advice swiftly and strategically advancing towards rightful settlement.

You’ve undoubtedly been through enough already; worrying about finessing your case needn’t compound your burdens any longer now. Don’t fret over how much your case could be worth because we’ve got it covered. Trust us when we say negotiation comes naturally after practicing law for so long! With just a click below let Carlson Bier step into action – because knowledge may give weight but action provides momentum.`

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Leland Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Leland Grove

Areas of Practice in Leland Grove

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying expert legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Trip Occurrences

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents get reasonable payout for hurts and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Building Collisions

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in offering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Focused on representing patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440