...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Louisville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Being bitten by a dog can lead to severe physical and emotional damage. If you’re a victim of a dog bite injury in Louisville, Carlson Bier should be your first choice for legal representation. We focus on helping individuals navigate their personal injury claims with extensive expertise specifically dealing with Dog Bite Injuries. With an unwavering commitment toward securing justice for victims, our law firm works diligently to build strong litigation strategies that favor the best possible outcomes. At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic experiencing a dog bite can be; thus, our attorneys handle each case carefully yet assertively ensuring victims are rightfully compensated for their pain and suffering as well as medical expenditures. Our top-notch client service coupled with successful track records sets us apart in managing such delicate situations meticulously whilst striving for excellent results every time by extending compassionate support throughout the legal proceedings mixed with solid professional acumen and diligence thereby making us an optimal choice for handling Dog Bite Injury cases effectively.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Louisville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the pain and distress caused by a vicious dog bite is not simply physical but penetrates into the psychological dimension as well. Our strategic team of highly qualified personal injury attorneys, based in Illinois, are experts in dog bite injuries law; utilizing precision and tact to ensure justice is served for those who have been unfortunate enough to experience this traumatic event.

Dog bites can lead to severe harmful consequences including extensive medical bills due to surgeries, medication treatment for potential infections that may occur after worst cases known like rabies or tetanus. There’s also the possibility of mental anguish leading from fear of dogs (Cynophobia) which could hinder your daily life considerably.

Compensation claims vary broadly depending on several factors including; severity of the injury, required ongoing medical treatment, any loss of earnings and psychological suffering incurred. Legal repercussions for canine owners differ significantly based on jurisdictional regulations however common decisive parameters typically include previous violent history of the pet involved or violation of local leash laws at time of injury incident.

• One crucial point concerning Dog Bite Injuries Law within Illinois; victims are given a considerable right by statute called “strict liability”. Stipulated under Illinois’ very own Animal Control Act – a dog owner is deemed fully responsible if his/her pet bites another person without justifiable provocation while they’re peacefully conducting themselves in locations they lawfully ought to be.

• Furthermore, it reinstates that no matter how cautious or diligent an owner was in trying to prevent their aggressive animal from biting someone, they will still hold absolute accountability if an incident does transpire.

• Another notable element distinctive to legislation within our state borders; Comparative Negligence- This implies if you were partially accountable for your injury intentionally inciting towards getting bitten then your compensation claim might considerably reduce proportionate with your share in causing the accident itself.

Carlson Bier guarantees meticulous navigation through these intricacies impeccably defending premises liability cases to ensure victims receive rightful compensation they’re deserved. We work meticulously to elaborate the key elements plaintiffs must illustrate in court; that the defendant owned the dog, plaintiff didn’t provoke the dog and that plaintiff was conducting themselves peaceably at a place he/she should lawfully be.

Our commitment to your case is unconditionally steadfast, fervently advocating for just representation while offering compassionate support through challenging times of personal injury infliction. Our strategic approach within Carlson Bier includes careful reviewal of injuries as part of our comprehensive investigation, interviewing witnesses if there are any involved, studying local ordinances regarding animals plus meticulous scrutiny accompanying previous violations committed by pet owners under consideration among other diligent methods deployed toward building a robust case.

Through substantial years handling dog bite cases around Illinois area, we firmly believe each scenario possesses its uniqueness thus necessitating personalized legal strategies curated towards optimal outcomes. Your journey towards fair restitution begins with us because here at Carlson Bier we’re not simply about taking up your case but ensuring you’re granted victory merited rightfully from pain endured due to others’ carelessness or neglect.

We warmly invite you now, click on the button below for a quick evaluation aimed at envisioning an estimate on what your particular claim could possibly accumulate in financial compensation. Empowering yourself with this knowledge can set you on path towards making informed decisions henceforth regarding your predicament under guidance from seasoned professionals armed with esteemed experience specifically rooted within Personal Injury Law including Dog Bite Injuries discipline.

So why wait longer and endure more pain when justice is only a step away? Allow us at Carlson Bier to bring respite back into your life today reassuringly supported arm-in-arm throughout this healing voyage charted onward to brighter days filled with promise after overcoming adversity past suffering has brought forth upon you as a result of careless irresponsible pet owner’s imprudence actions imperatively ought facing legal consequences their unjustifiable deeds have wrought onto innocent victim just like yourself who unfortunately encountered traumatic dog-bite inflicted injuries undeservedly.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Louisville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Louisville

Areas of Practice in Louisville

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Supplying skilled legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to helping patients of car accidents get appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing adept legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to providing expert legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in advocating for clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer