...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Louisville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been a victim of medical malpractice in Louisville, secure top legal representation with Carlson Bier. Renowned for our expertise and relentless pursuit of justice, we have solidified ourselves as prime choice for those seeking redress relating to Medical Malpractice. Navigating the complex waters of medical negligence claims requires an experienced hand – that’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. Armed with extensive knowledge in state-specific regulations coupled with unmatched investigative skills, we ensure thorough case evaluation and tenacious advocacy from start to finish. Our attorneys understand the devastating effects such situations can bring; thus they work tirelessly towards rightfully restoring what has been lost or repairing what has been damaged through compensation recovery efforts. With an impressive track record marked by substantial settlements & verdicts in favor of our clients, choosing Carlson Bier assures exceptional service devoted exclusively to your needs and well-being.TRUSTED AND VALUED: That’s more than just a promise; it’s the very ethos that defines us at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Louisville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re acutely aware of the enormous trust that you’ve entrusted us with while seeking legal representation in a medical malpractice circumstance. Our team of qualified and experienced personal injury attorneys established roots here in Illinois is more than equipped to zealously represent you.

Medical Malpractice revolves around negligence demonstrated by healthcare providers such as doctors, nurses or institutions like hospitals and nursing homes. These can range from misdiagnoses, improper treatment, surgical errors, wrong medication doses to failure to inform patients about treatment risks – any lapse that deviates from the standard of care accepted by the medical community causing patient harm.

Unraveling this complex terrain takes an intricate understanding of both law and medicine; expertise our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier certainly possess. Emphasizing transparency, we acquaint you first on what constitutes ‘standard of care’. This refers to what competent health care professional, under similar circumstances would do – a yardstick against how your health provision will be measured. Following this, we ensure you understand how proving breach in these standards requires thorough medical record review and expert testimony – which may appear overwhelming at first glance but not when guided professionally.

Further pointers for consideration:

• Not all bad outcomes are malpractice- sometimes despite following guidelines procedures go awry.

• Merit assessment plays a crucial role before filing suits in Illinois so specialized Medical Review Panels study these cases carefully.

• Damage caps have been declared unconstitutional in Illinois – meaning there’s no limit placed on awards for damages

Covering ground across these critical elements isn’t just essential for comprehensive legislation already passed protecting patients rights – discussing it allows potential clients like yourself to be indulged into evidence procurement process acting as our collaboratively efficient pillar.

Candid communication follows next – where we highlight how motivational factors behind lawsuits often revolve around ambiguity avoidance rather than retribution questing vindication through knowledge dissemination. Your case’s worth depends on several factors including estimated future medical costs, loss of earnings, the effect on your lifestyle, pain and suffering and emotional distress.

In Illinois, a majority of medical malpractice cases are settled out of court owing to associated high litigation expenses and risk factors. Our adept attorneys make it their resolution to strive for maximum compensation you’re entitled to while preserving your best interests astutely whether outside or inside courtrooms.

Finally yet importantly, navigating through these intricate laws as a plaintiff means grappling with two-year statute limitation from time injury was recognized – a facet we meticulously assist our clients in tracking accurately ensuring no rightful claim ever gets deterred hence honoring trust invested in us.

Through years our commitment has been channeled transparently towards providing relentless zealous representation ensuring patient’s rights against negligent medication providers are aggressively fought for. Our victims nor do they need to reach into their pockets until we win – because at Carlson Bier your fight is our fight.

We encourage you to harness this opportunity by clicking on the button below that will lead you through an easy process helping estimate how much your case might be worth. Explore uncompromised justice with our dedicated professionals guiding you every step of the way right here in Illinois–where true advocacy resides.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Louisville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Louisville

Areas of Practice in Louisville

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying expert legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Extending professional legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Crash

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to delivering compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on defending clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​