Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lyndon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Stricken by a dog bite injury in Lyndon, Illinois? Carlson Bier is diligent in ensuring just compensation for victims. Formidable and experienced, our legal team implements extensive knowledge of the localized statutes to fiercely advocate for your rights. Personal injuries from dog bites can be severe and emotionally distressing, leading to expensive medical bills and potential wage loss during recovery. We understand this enormous weighty impact on your life; thus we work tirelessly toward fair settlement outcomes or successful verdicts when dealing with insurance companies or courtrooms. For Carlson Bier, each case carries singular importance as we guide clients every step of the legal journey while focusing on easing their ordeal. Trust us to fight relentlessly for justice after you’ve suffered a traumatic dog bite incident within Lyndon’s vicinity.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lyndon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that undergoing a dog bite incident can be a harrowing experience. We are personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, committed to providing comprehensive legal counsel and representation regarding such cases. To protect your interests and hold accountable those liable for your injuries and distress.

Dog bites can result in not just physical pain but also generate emotional trauma. They may lead to severe infections, scarring, disfigurement or even death in rare terminal instances. Moreover, victims often end up facing substantial medical bills related to treatment procedures, surgeries and rehabilitation programs. This is where the expertise of our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier comes into play.

Our team of dedicated legal professionals delves deep into these complexities arising from dog bite incidents to ensure you receive the justice you deserve. Even if you’re not familiar with legalese jargon, we’ll break it down for you so it’s as understandable as possible without compromising on any critical details.

When dealing with dog bite injuries:

– It’s essential to identify the animal involved swiftly.

– Verification of its vaccination status needs due attention.

– Immediately organizing medical intervention becomes pivotal.

– Gathering evidence like photographs of injuries and eye-witness accounts should not be overlooked.

– Reporting the incident to local authorities adds credibility to the case.

However daunting it might seem initially, remembering these pointers makes all the difference between a stronger case and an otherwise weak one.

It’s worth mentioning here that Illinois operates under laws supporting strict liability when pertaining to dog bites or attacks. This implies negligence needn’t necessarily be proven for receiving compensation; ownership proof suffices most times. Hence, ensuring effective communication with us through each step allows us collectively devise strategies best suited for your circumstances specifically.

Nevertheless, there exist numerous aspects much more complicated than simple ownership determinant while building an injury lawsuit based on dog bites or similar animal-inflicted harms. The presence or lack thereof leash at injury time too weighs more than most realize, as does the legality of your presence at injury location. Our seasoned lawyers understand these nuanced factors and therefore can help navigate you through it all meticulously.

Special note should also be made regarding emotional distress caused by such incidents. These psychological damages are often overlooked or generally not given due importance in personal injury suits, but they make a significant part of total compensations claimed. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) resulting from these encounters is serious, irrespective of degree or intensity. Carlson Bier ensures victims recognize their rights on time to effectively leverage them while legally arguing for suitable reparation amounts.

As difficult and comprehensive as this landscape might appear, remember – you’re not alone in traversing it; our experienced team at Carlson Bier stands beside you every step of the way!

For compensation guidelines in dog bite lawsuits under Illinois jurisdiction:

– Medical bill reimbursement forms one chunk.

– Lost wages due to inability engaging in regular work during recovery period too counts drastically.

– Costs incurred towards future medical expenses anticipated like surgeries or therapies deserve mention here.

– Compensation for pain endured both physically and emotionally is included fairly frequently.

Other essential segments include effect on victim’s overall lifestyle/standard of living alongside alterations needed post injury/surgery like home renovation adapting to newly developed physical constraints. This list though appears elaborate, is non-exhaustive hence customized according each case’s unique dynamics.

At Carlson Bier, we strive relentlessly advocating for your rights ensuring optimal compensation payout materially reflecting losses occurred involving profound understanding about how Illinois Dog Bite Act interprets against relevant insurances carried by pet owners alongside local governmental rules/regulations controlling animal behaviours in general and legal ramifications resulting thereupon. In today’s troubling times fraught with ever looming uncertainties – especially when facing aftermaths following personal injuries sustained from aggressive animals – having a trusted legal advisor who understands specificities pertaining laws under current local city statutes becomes invaluable aid helping you stand firm recuperating vigorously bearing minimal financial burden.

We encourage you to explore further and click on the button below. Let us help ascertain what your case is worth, free from auditing pressures under our no-obligation consultation policy. Stand up for rallying your rights with Carlson Bier – because you deserve nothing short of best!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lyndon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lyndon

Areas of Practice in Lyndon

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing specialist legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Providing dedicated legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal services to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents gain equitable recompense for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending adept legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to representing patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer