...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Madison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be an overwhelming experience. It’s essential that you receive the best legal assistance in pursuing your claim, and nobody does it better than Carlson Bier – experienced personal injury lawyers specializing in dog bite injuries. We understand the prevalent laws governing such cases here in Illinois, including Madison’s localized stipulations that cater to specific circumstances surrounding dog-related accidents. At Carlson Bier, we compile rock-solid evidence while embracing compassion to fight for clients’ rights assertively yet fairly. Our dedicated lawyer team is equipped with extensive knowledge of procedural rules and legal jargon related to dog bite liabilities making us your go-to solution when dealing with these incidents’ aftermaths. Our relentless pursuit of justice coupled with our affection towards understanding victims’ plights stands out as an unrivaled balance not witnessed elsewhere within this line of work; it’s what brings about superior results for our clients at all times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Madison Illinois

In the intricate world of personal injury law, understanding the nuances involved in dog bite injuries is pivotal. At Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases, we provide expert legal representation to individuals who have suffered such unfortunate incidents. Our team brings a wealth of firsthand experience and keen knowledge about the particulars around dog bite injuries.

One essential aspect that needs clarity is the severity component – not all dog bites are created equal. A simple nip that does not break the skin and a severe mauling, leading to critical injuries or disfiguration, are vastly different situations yet grouped under ‘dog bite injuries’. It’s these intricacies that alter routes for legal proceeding.

A vital development area within this niche includes breed-specific laws and statutes at play. The detail-oriented nature of these legal pathways often poses difficulties to laymen trying to figure out their next steps after an incident.

• Some laws hold owners strictly liable for any harm caused by their dogs regardless of known aggression history

• In contrast, other regulations operate on a “one-bite rule” premise where victim compensation depends on prior records demonstrating a given animal’s dangerous propensity

Aligning one’s case with prevailing liability issues also constitutes key components which significantly affect claim outcomes:

• An owner failing to comply with leash laws

• Keeping their pet in inadequate conditions violating local ordinances

• Owning specifically restricted breeds without corresponding permits

Similarly, external factors like provoked attacks could give rise to defenses for owners against claims made by dog bite victims. As peculiar as some individual variables might seem when dealing with dog bite scenarios, it’s our responsibility as your legal representatives to shed light on how they come into play toward shaping final verdicts.

This principle applies as equally when assessing damage incurred extent – both physical and psychological- before turning them calculable financial figures fair for compensated damages:

• Medical expenses from immediate emergency care requirements through ongoing treatment costs

• Pain and suffering with an increasing acceptance for mental anguish related damages in dog bite scenarios

• Lost earnings due to inability work or compromised career opportunities

• Potential punitive measures based on specific case details

Remember, while these pointers hint at general trends within legal realms of dog injuries cases, individual claims are contingent upon particular incidents’ specifics. Expert legal guidance from dedicated professionals like Carlson Bier can make distinguishing differences helping victims secure rightful compensations.

Demonstrably navigating these topics pertinent to understanding a victim’s rights and liabilities becomes our primary focus area during consultations. Our attorneys look into the minutest detail while foreseeing possible liabilities that could arise given the complex nature of personal injury law.

Here at Carlson Bier, we strive to keep the process investable for clients through minimal upfront fees and maximum transparency – translating practical implications of legalese jargon associated with handling paperwork or courtroom presentations into manageable action plans– all committed towards ensuring your right isn’t undermined by limited document-based understandings.

In recognizing that every dog bite scenario harbors unique challenges requiring tailored problem-solving approaches, we prioritize delivering on this promise: justice served correctly, completely, and compassionarily.

We’re here not just for service provision but also act as informative guides enabling you to comprehend unknown territory curves where injuries involve dogs. By extending beyond core attorney functions toward becoming an accessible resource depot for those affected by such situations – irrespective of whether they transform into formal cases – our team holds fast onto its objective: Bringing value to everyone seeking answers around dog bites in Illinois’s ever evolving injury law landscape.

As you navigate through post-incident uncertainties including recovery timescales; insurance claim interactions; exploring potential steps forward – remember that detailed clarity is only one step away. For matters so consequential impacting lives well beyond injury scopes, let’s work toward making it as straightforward as possible!

Curious about your case scenario? Confidentially discover more about what compensation fairness might look like given specific sets of circumstances – simply click the button below. Together, let us explore how we can turn your difficult today into a more bearable tomorrow.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Madison Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Madison

Areas of Practice in Madison

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering adept legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Slip Accidents

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents gain fair remuneration for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Crash

Extending adept legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​