Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Madison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can have profound impacts on your life. This necessitates the need for expert legal representation to ensure you receive the compensation due to you. Carlson Bier, an esteemed law firm in Illinois specializing in personal injury litigation, stands as one of the finest choices when seeking aggressive and dedicated legal aid for such complex cases. Their prowess is unparalleled in handling intricate matters relating to spinal cord damage claims.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier are proficiently skilled with laws applicable in Madison; they meticulously curate compelling case strategies aiming at maximum restitution. Using precision-backed techniques mixed with compassionate client service, judgments consistently lean favorably toward their clients even amidst traditionally challenging legislature observed within this particular geographical area.

Their deep-rooted understanding of medical intricacies surrounding Spinal Cord Injuries and associated challenges faced by victims serve as an underpinning advantage while advocating against insurance companies or contentious parties.

Instead of promises made lightly without substantiating results (a common practice among competitors), Carlson Bier ensures action-driven work ethics guiding each step of litigative proceedings towards robust positive outcomes – truly making them an optimal choice amid Spinal Cord Injury Lawyers considering their exceptional reputation, skills and commitment throughout Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Madison Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in providing exceptional legal services to individuals who have incurred spinal cord injuries due to negligence or misconduct of others. Our compassion for the physical and emotional upheaval our clients often face is surpassed only by our commitment to obtain justice on their behalf.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs), with their consequential life-altering changes such as paralysis and loss of sensory functions, can be devastating both physically and emotionally. Therefore, understanding these injuries well is pivotal for those affected along with their caretakers.

• Human spinal cord – Made up of nerves running from the bottom of the brain down through your backbone

• Function – Sends messages back and forth between your body and brain

• Injury results – Can disrupt this exchange leading to impairments

Should you experience an SCI as a result of someone else’s negligence, immediate action is crucial. An essential part of our role at Carlson Bier involves creating awareness about the seriousness of SCIs while navigating complex legal systems.

Given the high medical costs associated with treating SCIs – which include but are not limited to emergency care expenses, rehabilitation costs, prescriptive medication prices, adaptive equipment purchases, among other fees – achieving suitable compensation for these financial hardships becomes vital. Do remember that all cases differ greatly; therefore it is important to consult with professionals who have thorough knowledge about parallel precedents in Illinois.

To that end:

• Specialized team: The committed attorneys at Carlson Bier possess deep expertise in personal injury claims involving SCIs.

• Catered Approach: We understand how unique each case can be hence why customized strategies are developed per client’s individual needs.

• Resource Allocation: Utilizing vast resources equipped to fully investigate and aggressively pursue rightful compensation.

Our dedicated team will guide you throughout every step within Illinois’ legal framework – gathering requisite evidence against negligent/causally party(ies); establishing proof for financial, emotional, and physical damages; as well as structuring cogent arguments to win just repayment for incurred personal losses.

While the legal dynamics can feel overwhelming during recovery, please remember you are not alone. Carlson Bier’s committed team practices unwavering client advocacy. Our reputation thrives on proven track records procuring rightful compensation – at times expenses related but not limited to medical bills, lost earnings, lifelong disability adaptions and pain suffering caused by SCIs. Our firm ensures compassionate yet aggressive representation of your rights amidst intricate legal frameworks regarding personal injury lawsuits in Illinois.

We also want our clients to be aware that laws within Illinois allow a limited timeframe post-SCI occurrence during which legal action can be initiated. Navigating these complexities while simultaneously providing care for an SCI-affected person can be challenging – another reason why it’s important to contact a professional law firm like Carlson Bier promptly.

In summation, your search for dedicated lawyers with unwavering grit in representing spinal cord injury cases ends with us at Carlson Bier – your advocates for justice amid life-changing injuries ensue due to others’ negligence. Whatever adversities may arise from your situation, we endeavor to translate them into opportunities aimed at advancing your health condition and financial stability concurrently.

Now comes your most crucial decision: Determining what’s next? Allow us to take charge of the uncertainty surrounding spinal cord injury lawsuits so you can focus wholly on recovery and rehabilitation. Go ahead and click the button below to find out how much your unique case is worth. Since individual circumstances significantly determine potential settlements or disputations value offered by guilty parties/insurers so stay rest assured… At Carlson Bier – we tirelessly fight to gain apt reparation for each uniquely affected client!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Madison Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Madison

Areas of Practice in Madison

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Giving specialist legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering professional legal representation for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents gain fair recompense for injuries and damages.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Damages

Expert in ensuring professional legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer