FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Maple Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been victim to a slip and fall accident, securing the right legal representation can be crucial. With Carlson Bier at your side, you’re availing yourself of seasoned Slip And Fall Accidents attorneys acclaimed for their expert handling of such cases in Illinois communities like Maple Park. Our personal injury attorneys are vigilant experts at identifying contributing factors that make the difference between mere accidents and avoidable misfortunes caused by negligence or misconduct. High traffic areas, wet floors without warning signs, uneven surfaces—these potential hazards call for professional scrutiny from lawyers who specialize in these complex cases which is why turning to Carlson Bier ensures meticulous attention to detail coupled with unwavering determination. By entrusting us with your case, we pledge to tirelessly advocate on your behalf while navigating through the complexities of law because our paramount purpose remains standing up for injured individuals such as yourself against unjust circumstances.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Maple Park Illinois

At the distinguished Carlson Bier law firm, we uphold an unwavering commitment to individuals who have been subjected to unfortunate slip and fall accidents in Illinois. These incidents can transpire anywhere – supermarkets, office buildings, restaurants or even your neighbor’s sidewalk. The list is endless; however so too are the legal solutions offered by our dedicated team of personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier.

It’s essential to understand that slip and fall accidents constitute a significant part of personal injury cases presented under premises liability laws. In essence, these particular laws hold property owners accountable for maintaining safe conditions on their land premise. Still, stereotypes exist which often wrongfully belittle slip and fall incidents as trivial occurrences.

On the contrary, they injure thousands annually with wounds ranging from simple sprains to severe fractures or even traumatic brain injuries. At Carlton Bier Law Group, we assure each client facing such mishaps not only top-tier representation but also compassion evoking understanding.

Key points about our approach include:

• Thorough investigation: We meticulously examine all aspects of your case. From incident reports and medical data research to gathering available surveillance footage or eyewitness testimonies

• Rigorous preparation: Our dedicated team is skilled in bundling strong factual evidence necessary for solidifying your claim

• Undeterred negotiation: With us by your side, rest assured we’ll fiercely advocate for maximum compensation to recover from physical and emotional trauma due to negligence

Appropriate knowledge often acts as a first step towards empowerment when confronting such challenging scenarios in life. Therefore, it’s crucial you understand common factors relating to Slip and Fall Accidents. Proving Liability heavily relies on whether the property owner acted negligently concerning keeping the premises secure or how foreseeable was it that their negligence would induce an accident.

Yet another angle enters into question- could anything have been done by the injured party themselves? To better anticipate these complex nuances it becomes critical that you equip yourself with effective lawyers who comprehend the intricated web of law procedures, evidentiary requirements and understanding defense strategies in Slip and Fall cases.

Another fundamental aspect worth noting is that Illinois applies a system referred to as “modified comparative negligence” in personal injury cases. In such instances, an injured person can still recover damages even if they are partly at fault for their mishap; with provided conditions that their share of blame is less than 51%.

At Carlson Bier, our attorneys use proven methods while working around this law system, thus striving to achieve ideal results for you. Legal representation bears neither one-size-fits-all suits nor generic solutions; it requires bespoke approach per case-match its complexity uniqueness and client expectations.

With Carlson Bier by your side you can expect:

• Comprehensive case analysis: Our lawyers meticulously study every factor pertinent to your accident

• Strategic lawsuit plan: We draft an aggressive litigation strategy after evaluating potential defenses or additional parties involved

• Insurance company liaison: We handle all insurance company interactions on behalf

Lastly, we have a fair fee policy offering contingent fees- meaning no upfront costs; we get paid only when you secure compensation. Also important to note, we strictly abide by Illinois Law regarding office representations. While our physical presence spans multiple locations throughout Illinois, utilize our user-friendly platform for immediate virtual consultations anytime from any corner of this state.

Your search ends here – Navigate effortlessly towards legal resolution utilizing Carlson Bier’s outstanding services because ‘Justice should never be postponed.’ To anchor this transformative journey ahead click the button below–Let’s discover together how much value lies within your case today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Maple Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Maple Park

Areas of Practice in Maple Park

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering specialist legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Extending experienced legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Delivering legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Extending adept legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Expert in extending compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Expert in assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440