FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Marine

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one falls victim to a dog bite injury in Marine, Illinois, immediate and expert legal representation is crucial. With considerable expertise in personal injury law particularly with regard to Dog Bite Injuries, Carlson Bier is an ideal choice for advocacy. Our seasoned team of attorneys stand ready to assert your rights under the full extent of the law. Every dog bite case handled by our firm receives thorough investigation and meticulous preparation to strive for maximum compensation. We understand that following such an unfortunate incident, clients face not only physical pain but also emotional distress compounded by medical costs and possible loss of income due to time off work. That’s why the relentless pursuit of justice delivered by Carlson Bier aims at reducing this burden significantly through securing rightful claims promptly and effectively utilizing all available legal avenues. Trusting Carlson Bier translates into entrusting experienced hands well-versed with the intricate nuances associated with dealing with Municipal Codes related to animal control issues across Illinois including Marine city jurisdictions.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Marine Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our experienced personal injury attorneys in Illinois are well-acquainted with the complexities of dog bite injuries. Understanding that a dog attack can be an emotionally traumatizing and physically damaging event, we provide you with dedicated legal assistance to protect your rights and support you through every step of your compensation claim.

Dog bites can result in serious injuries ranging from deep puncture wounds, lacerations to nerve damage and even psychological trauma. Additional complications such as infections may add to the distress and financial burden suffered by the victim. It’s crucial to consult with an expert personal injury attorney who is knowledgeable about specific laws governing these cases in Illinois.

A few key points regarding Dog Bite Injuries:

– Under the Illinois Animal Control Act, a dog owner is strictly liable if their pet attacks someone without provocation.

– It’s not necessary for the victim to prove negligence on part of the dog owner for claiming compensation.

– Immediate medical attention should be sought following a dog bite. Not only does it ensure proper treatment but also substantiates any claims for damages.

These laws help victims assert their right for fair compensation towards medical bills, lost wages due to missed workdays, physical therapy costs or emotional distress caused by the incident.

However, potential exceptions do exist within these laws. For instance,

– If a person knowingly provokes a dog into attacking them,

– If they ignore clear warning signs such as ‘Beware of Dog’,

– Or unlawfully enter premises where they get bitten —

They might not qualify under this statute’s protection. These often complex legal criteria emphasize the need for specialized guidance when navigating Dog Bite Injury Lawsuits.

Our methodical approach at Carlson Bier involves thorough documentation of all aspects related to your case including photographic evidence of initial wounds and healing progress, collecting witness testimony if available, noting down specifics like location & circumstances leading up to the incident along with evaluating impact on overall quality-of-life post-event.

Complementing our legal expertise, we foster an attentive client servicing culture. Our commitment is to keep you updated about case developments without overwhelming you with complex legalese; conveying clear and concise updates ensuring you stay informed and empowered.

Remember, the Illinois law stipulates a statute of limitations which means that all personal injury compensation claims including those for dog bite injuries are time-sensitive. It’s deemed paramount to seek legal consultation at the earliest to avoid forfeiting your lawful right towards compensation due to delayed action. This becomes even more critical when medical bills start piling up and loss of income begins to strain finances on account of the incident.

It’s critical in these situations not just for protecting your interests but also potentially impacting future prevention measures if an irresponsible pet owner is held accountable for their negligence through proper legal recourse.

At Carlson Bier, we value transparent engagement with aspects of contingency fee arrangement explained upfront allowing potential clients like you peace of mind as we guide you through this process relentlessly championing your rights till reaching a successful resolution.

Trust us with handling your dog bite injury lawsuit proficiently while aiding you navigate any potential stress surrounding it. Aiming not only at securing rightful compensation emphasizes accountability from negligent parties fostering safer community spaces ultimately underlining our commitment beyond routine law practice!

Simply click on the button below to find out what your case might be worth! Let Carlson Bier assist in getting you the justice and compensation that you rightfully deserve. Allow us to turn this harrowing experience into a beacon of hope underlining that no individual deserves to suffer because someone else failed in keeping their dog restrained within limits of safety & sensibility.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marine Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Marine

Areas of Practice in Marine

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying specialist legal services for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure just settlement for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering experienced legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in offering professional legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in defending victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​