...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Marissa

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one suffered from burn injuries in Marissa? If so, you understand the catastrophic after-effects that can drastically alter one’s life. Carlson Bier Associates stands ready to assist all victims of accidental burns. Our commitment to justice is proven by our rigorous pursuit of deserved compensation for those affected. With years of extensive experience and an impressive track record, Carlson Bier has built a formidable reputation as personal injury attorneys specializing in handling complex burn injury cases with compassion and fervor. We employ strategic methods when representing our clients – mindful research into case details and comprehensive litigation strategies have consistently been significant catalysts towards achieving favorable outcomes on their behalf; because we understand every detail counts when it comes to claims involving pain, suffering, lost wages, medical bills or other damages resulting from severe burns incidents. To fight for what lay behind your distressing circumstance – choose wisely beside the flames; make justice prevail – with uncompromising aid from none other than the proficient Burn Injury lawyers at Carlson Bier Associates.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Marissa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have seen the life-altering impact that burn injuries can have on an individual. Our experienced attorneys possess a deep understanding of the complexities surrounding these types of injury cases and are dedicated to advocating passionately for our clients in Illinois who endure such unfortunate circumstances.

Burn injuries can stem from various situations, developing as thermal burns caused by direct contact with open flames or hot surfaces, chemical burns from harsh acids or alkaline substances, electrical burns due to contact with high-voltage sources, or even radiation burns related to strong ultraviolet light exposure. These wounds vary significantly in their degree of severity – first-degree affecting only the skin’s outer layer, moderate second-degree penetrating deeper into the dermis, and critical third-degree involving all skin layers down to damaged nerve endings and possibly underlying tissues.

So what factors do we consider when assessing burn injury cases?

• The Severity: It is pivotal that medical assessments correctly categorize how far-reaching your burn damage is since this defines not only your immediate treatment plan but also influences any potential prognosis.

• Proving Liability: Determining fault within personal injury law involves proving negligence on behalf of another party. For example, lax safety regulations at a workplace leading to fire incidents would implicate employer liability.

• Assessing Damages: Herein analyzing costs associated with medical bills, rehabilitation therapy sessions if necessary, potential earnings lost due to inability to work post-injury amongst other financial ingress.

• Emotional Impact: Psychologically traumatic implications are valid considerations within burn injury casework too which can entitle you to compensatory claims for emotional distress suffered.

Within each case unique subtleties exist; so it’s essential you liaise with skilled professionals well-versed in detailed investigation processes. Knowledgeable in linking cause/result relationships and dedicated in ensuring fair compensation aligns commensurately with your profound experience. And here at Carlson Bier, those are qualities we pride ourselves on offering.

We intuitively know our clients resonate with relationships built on honesty, integrity and dedication. Our personal impact extends beyond merely winning cases – we’re about staking your case within the heart of legal exactitude, amplifying your victim narrative to levels obligating responsible parties towards appropriate recompense.

Our attorney’s vast experience spans diverse burn injury circumstances giving them solid insight into potential case outcomes based on similar scenario precursors. Coupled with our commitment towards open communication, you’ll be constantly kept in the loop every step of the way – no misunderstood jargon or unanswered question, ever!

With Carlson Bier by your side you can expect more than just robust representation – we illustrate acknowledgment for your unique challenges, deep respect for all that you’ve overcome; an unwavering determination to draw those accountable into deserved responsibility.

Burn injuries carry tremendous burden not only physically but emotionally too. We sincerely understand how daunting it can be dealing with such adversity while simultaneously navigating judicial channels in seeking justice over circumstance out of control. But remember, while breath lingers within so does hope…

And Hope at Carlson Bier turns advocacy into action! So why not take that first step now? Don’t allow further moments to lapse as doubts possibly creep up: “How much is my case truly worth?” Well let us assess that properly for you.

Your journey towards reclamation starts thereby clicking on the button below – reclaim what’s owed to you without any further ado!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marissa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Marissa

Areas of Practice in Marissa

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Offering expert legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Offering specialist legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Injuries

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Focused on assisting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for wounds and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending experienced legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in extending compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Focused on advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​