...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Melvin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re in need of a Dog Bite Injuries attorney, choosing Carlson Bier is an unequivocal choice. We stand out in our field for providing excellent legal assistance and compassionate support to victims who are dealing with the aftermath of dog bite injuries. Navigating through the intricate paths of personal injury law can be daunting to most; however, our team will guide you professionally every step of the way. With Carlson Bier, it’s not just about winning cases but also ensuring that our clients receive optimal medical care and compensation they’re entitled to under Illinois law. Our proven track record shows consistent settlements favoring our clients assertively facing insurance companies on their behalf. When faced with such life-altering circumstances as dog bite injuries can potentially pose, choosing a top-tier firm like ours could make all the difference between struggling alone or being well represented legally while achieving restitution rightfully deserved. Trust us at Carlson Bier for unparalleled commitment and exceptional representation in Dog Bite Injuries litigation.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Melvin Illinois

As experienced personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier, we understand the physical, emotional and psychological repercussions of animal attacks such as dog bites. Statistics indicate hundreds of thousands of U.S. residents suffer dog bite injuries each year. Living in Illinois, you might not be privy to how the law specifically handles such cases – especially when they lead to compelling damages both physically and mentally. Here we delve into offering detailed insight on the procedures and legalities associated with dog bite injuries in Illinois.

Dog bite laws vary from state to state throughout America; however, it’s vital to recognize that Illinois operates under a strict liability dog bite statute. Unlike some few ‘One Bite’ states that forgive dogs for their first attack offense, this means regardless of perceived predisposed aggressive nature or past incidences, any harm inflicted by a domestic pet makes their owner legally liable for all consequent damages.

• The essentials required for proving a claim include demonstrating:

• That the defendant owned the dog

• That you, as the plaintiff were peaceably conducting yourself in a location where you had legal rights to be (i.e., not trespassing)

• And that your resultant injuries were indeed caused by the defendant’s dog

That said, our dedicated team at Carlson Bier is equipped with vast expertise handling similar claims successfully using compiled evidence varying from those obtained through eyewitness testimonials, photographs covering distinct timelines depicting visible trauma countless medical records among others.

Importantly too – no need to fret if bitten while on private property since owners are obligated to ensure safety measures around their pets irrespective of territorial thresholds unless an exception applies i.e., provoking or tormenting the dog unlawfully.

Being a victim of a serious injury such as one resulting from a traumatic event like being bitten by someone else’s canine can easily leave one overwhelmed—managing hospital bills coupled with often hefty insurance paperwork which stretch beyond strained nerves post-incident enhances these emotions exponentially further! What if you knew those crippling financial repercussions weren’t necessarily yours to bear?

Many individuals are unaware that dog owners’ insurance policies commonly allow claims for medical expenditures and even losses earned through missed working hours due to a need for healing break. This is in addition to compensation covering emotional trauma, pain, and suffering.

The process of pursuing such a case may seem daunting, but rest assured with Carlson Bier on your side we navigate the often complex legalities systematically simplifying each step for our clients. Each case demands unique attention hence treated distinctively thereby guaranteeing custom solution rendering works towards actualizing rightful outcomes – all without any upfront costs until successful compensation attainment!

In understanding the gravity surrounding adoption resonance within cities throughout Illinois numerous agencies have strict regulations necessitating ensuring their animals don’t pose risks to potential adopters or society in general – except these aren’t always foolproof! Should you consequently suffer injuries from a neglectful agency’s pet via an undiscovered aggressive tendency (among other examples), these bodies could be held responsible.

At this point, it’s key to note that seeking justice doesn’t equate harboring ill will against dogs nor condoning intolerance towards them either; rather calls for better societal co-existence embracing mutual safety measures around these furry friends who largely form integral parts of countless homes nationwide.

Remember: Time runs against personal injury claims courtesy of statute limitation laws. Therefore, swift report filing upon occurrence boosts the odds stacked favorably in your corner where proving accountability is pivotal determining eventual liability and subsequent compensation eligibility.

Having comprehensively explored dog bite injury related concerns prevalent within Illinois encompassing legal recommendations coupled with Carlson Bier attorneys’ vast expertise navigating these unique cases we hope you feel enlightened plus sufficiently armed should unfortunate incidence place one onto such disheartening paths.

Because every second counts in securing what rightfully belongs to victims of dog bite incidents! Click the button below immediately should you desire expert legal guidance actualizing accurate estimates regarding potential compensations lawfully due. Don’t let the lasting effect of a dog bite injury hinder your prospects for complete recovery and compensation!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Melvin Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Melvin

Areas of Practice in Melvin

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing skilled legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Providing experienced legal services for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents get equitable recompense for harms and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Mishap

Delivering experienced legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Committed to providing dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer